拉斯维加斯到底发生了什么?内华达州第一天报告中心的随机对照试验评估结果

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Prison Journal Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1177/00328855221095532
Linsey A. Belisle, M. P. West, William H. Sousa
{"title":"拉斯维加斯到底发生了什么?内华达州第一天报告中心的随机对照试验评估结果","authors":"Linsey A. Belisle, M. P. West, William H. Sousa","doi":"10.1177/00328855221095532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study is one of few to utilize a randomized controlled trial design to evaluate the effects of a Day Reporting Center (DRC). Individuals on community supervision were randomly assigned to the DRC group or the control group. Path models examined the direct and indirect effects of DRC participation on social outcomes, revocations, and violations. Findings suggest that DRCs might effectively achieve their goals, at least in the short term and for some types of individuals. While these findings suggest that DRCs can be effective, more research is needed before definitive policy implications can be made.","PeriodicalId":47409,"journal":{"name":"Prison Journal","volume":"102 1","pages":"304 - 324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Really Happens in Vegas?: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluation of Nevada's First Day Reporting Center\",\"authors\":\"Linsey A. Belisle, M. P. West, William H. Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00328855221095532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study is one of few to utilize a randomized controlled trial design to evaluate the effects of a Day Reporting Center (DRC). Individuals on community supervision were randomly assigned to the DRC group or the control group. Path models examined the direct and indirect effects of DRC participation on social outcomes, revocations, and violations. Findings suggest that DRCs might effectively achieve their goals, at least in the short term and for some types of individuals. While these findings suggest that DRCs can be effective, more research is needed before definitive policy implications can be made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prison Journal\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"304 - 324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prison Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855221095532\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prison Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855221095532","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的研究是少数利用随机对照试验设计来评估日间报告中心(DRC)效果的研究之一。接受社区监督的个体被随机分配到DRC组或对照组。路径模型考察了刚果民主共和国参与对社会结果、撤销和违规行为的直接和间接影响。研究结果表明,DRCs可能有效地实现其目标,至少在短期内和对某些类型的人来说是这样。虽然这些发现表明DRCs可能是有效的,但在做出明确的政策影响之前,还需要更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Really Happens in Vegas?: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluation of Nevada's First Day Reporting Center
The current study is one of few to utilize a randomized controlled trial design to evaluate the effects of a Day Reporting Center (DRC). Individuals on community supervision were randomly assigned to the DRC group or the control group. Path models examined the direct and indirect effects of DRC participation on social outcomes, revocations, and violations. Findings suggest that DRCs might effectively achieve their goals, at least in the short term and for some types of individuals. While these findings suggest that DRCs can be effective, more research is needed before definitive policy implications can be made.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prison Journal
Prison Journal CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The editorial team"s aim is to establish The Prison Journal as a focal point and the forum of choice for studies, ideas, and discussion of adult and juvenile confinement, treatment interventions, and alternative sanctions.
期刊最新文献
What Do Correctional Leaders Think About Faith-Based Programs? Results From a National Survey Walking an EmotionalTightrope: Examining the Carceral Emotion Culture(s) of Federal Prisons for Women in Canada Deconstructing the Power Dynamics of Prison Research Health-Related Experiences, Needs, and Challenges of Transgender People in Prisons: A Systematic Review When Checking a Box is not Enough: The (Un)Readability of PREA Messaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1