两种秩序的故事:从新政到新自由主义

Q3 Social Sciences New Labor Forum Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/10957960231169718
K. Rader
{"title":"两种秩序的故事:从新政到新自由主义","authors":"K. Rader","doi":"10.1177/10957960231169718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"points out the limits of a narrow focus on the police itself. Calling the demand to defund the police a “weak call for redistribution,” he believes the focus instead should be on the much larger sum of “tax breaks, land grants, infrastructure improvements, public contracts and other giveaways that are doled out to corporations and developers.” Concretely, Johnson stresses that the central task should be to build alliances that are broad enough to fight the investor class and its agenda of privatizing public goods so wealth can be transferred to the top. He proposes the establishment of municipal-level public works programs, inspired by New Deal–era initiatives such as the Works Progress Administration, as a way to begin rolling back the carceral state by addressing the root causes of structural unemployment. Various potential jobs that would contribute to the public good are outlined. Public transit could be improved through the hiring of more staff as platform guides and to perform needed tasks like deicing platforms and installing heat lamps. Other important jobs like public school repair, wetland restoration, adult literacy education, and more are discussed. The strength of this section is that the proposals are ambitious while still being modest enough that one could imagine beginning to build a real-life coalition to fight for them. The critiques put forth in After Black Lives Matter are biting but necessary as we consider how to move forward. The book contains the kind of historical context and strategic thinking that has for too long been missing in conversations about police brutality and racial inequality. Readers will find it to be a useful tool in the fight against the neoliberal regime of policing.","PeriodicalId":37142,"journal":{"name":"New Labor Forum","volume":"32 1","pages":"88 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Tale of Two Orders: From the New Deal to Neoliberalism\",\"authors\":\"K. Rader\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10957960231169718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"points out the limits of a narrow focus on the police itself. Calling the demand to defund the police a “weak call for redistribution,” he believes the focus instead should be on the much larger sum of “tax breaks, land grants, infrastructure improvements, public contracts and other giveaways that are doled out to corporations and developers.” Concretely, Johnson stresses that the central task should be to build alliances that are broad enough to fight the investor class and its agenda of privatizing public goods so wealth can be transferred to the top. He proposes the establishment of municipal-level public works programs, inspired by New Deal–era initiatives such as the Works Progress Administration, as a way to begin rolling back the carceral state by addressing the root causes of structural unemployment. Various potential jobs that would contribute to the public good are outlined. Public transit could be improved through the hiring of more staff as platform guides and to perform needed tasks like deicing platforms and installing heat lamps. Other important jobs like public school repair, wetland restoration, adult literacy education, and more are discussed. The strength of this section is that the proposals are ambitious while still being modest enough that one could imagine beginning to build a real-life coalition to fight for them. The critiques put forth in After Black Lives Matter are biting but necessary as we consider how to move forward. The book contains the kind of historical context and strategic thinking that has for too long been missing in conversations about police brutality and racial inequality. Readers will find it to be a useful tool in the fight against the neoliberal regime of policing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Labor Forum\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"88 - 91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Labor Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10957960231169718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Labor Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10957960231169718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

指出了狭隘地关注警察本身的局限性。他把取消警察拨款的要求称为“再分配的软弱呼吁”,他认为,重点应该放在“减税、土地补助、基础设施改善、公共合同和其他发放给企业和开发商的赠品”上。具体而言,约翰逊强调,核心任务应该是建立足够广泛的联盟,以对抗投资者阶层及其将公共产品私有化的议程,从而使财富能够转移到顶层。他建议建立市级公共工程项目,其灵感来自于罗斯福新政时期的一些举措,如“工程振兴署”(works Progress Administration),通过解决结构性失业的根本原因,以此作为开始扭转贫困状态的一种方式。对公共利益有贡献的各种潜在工作被列出。公共交通可以通过雇佣更多的工作人员作为站台向导,并执行必要的任务,如站台除冰和安装加热灯来改善。其他重要的工作,如公立学校维修,湿地恢复,成人扫盲教育,以及更多的讨论。这一部分的优势在于,这些提议既雄心勃勃,又足够温和,以至于人们可以想象开始建立一个现实生活中的联盟来为它们而战。在我们考虑如何前进时,《黑人的生命也很重要》一书中提出的批评是尖锐但必要的。这本书包含了长期以来在关于警察暴行和种族不平等的讨论中所缺失的那种历史背景和战略思考。读者会发现这是一个对抗新自由主义警察制度的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Tale of Two Orders: From the New Deal to Neoliberalism
points out the limits of a narrow focus on the police itself. Calling the demand to defund the police a “weak call for redistribution,” he believes the focus instead should be on the much larger sum of “tax breaks, land grants, infrastructure improvements, public contracts and other giveaways that are doled out to corporations and developers.” Concretely, Johnson stresses that the central task should be to build alliances that are broad enough to fight the investor class and its agenda of privatizing public goods so wealth can be transferred to the top. He proposes the establishment of municipal-level public works programs, inspired by New Deal–era initiatives such as the Works Progress Administration, as a way to begin rolling back the carceral state by addressing the root causes of structural unemployment. Various potential jobs that would contribute to the public good are outlined. Public transit could be improved through the hiring of more staff as platform guides and to perform needed tasks like deicing platforms and installing heat lamps. Other important jobs like public school repair, wetland restoration, adult literacy education, and more are discussed. The strength of this section is that the proposals are ambitious while still being modest enough that one could imagine beginning to build a real-life coalition to fight for them. The critiques put forth in After Black Lives Matter are biting but necessary as we consider how to move forward. The book contains the kind of historical context and strategic thinking that has for too long been missing in conversations about police brutality and racial inequality. Readers will find it to be a useful tool in the fight against the neoliberal regime of policing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Labor Forum
New Labor Forum Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Queer Workers in the American Workplace From Climate Alienation to Climate Solidarity Floaters Today’s Immigration Crisis: A Broken Asylum System An Interview with Muzaffar Chishti The “Stand-Up” Strike of 2023 Takes Its Place in UAW History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1