多雇主固定收益养老金计划:雇主提款和财务脆弱性

IF 1.4 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE North American Actuarial Journal Pub Date : 2022-04-11 DOI:10.1080/10920277.2022.2041040
Tianxiang Shi, Xuesong You
{"title":"多雇主固定收益养老金计划:雇主提款和财务脆弱性","authors":"Tianxiang Shi, Xuesong You","doi":"10.1080/10920277.2022.2041040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiemployer defined benefit pension plans are facing severe funding challenges. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 requires that a multiemployer pension plan with an actuarial funded percentage of less than 80% must take corrective actions to improve its financial health. We use a regression discontinuity design to examine the effect of funding rule requirements on employer withdrawals from multiemployer pension plans. We find that multiemployer pension plans subject to funding rule requirements are about 14 percentage points more likely to experience employer withdrawals in a 1-year period compared to plans not required to take any corrective actions. We also find that plans with ex ante employer withdrawal experiences are more vulnerable to financial shocks such as the 2008 financial crisis. Our study provides important policy implications for regulators concerning best practices to build pension plan resilience to insolvency events.","PeriodicalId":46812,"journal":{"name":"North American Actuarial Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"121 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiemployer Defined Benefit Pension Plans: Employer Withdrawals and Financial Vulnerability\",\"authors\":\"Tianxiang Shi, Xuesong You\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10920277.2022.2041040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multiemployer defined benefit pension plans are facing severe funding challenges. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 requires that a multiemployer pension plan with an actuarial funded percentage of less than 80% must take corrective actions to improve its financial health. We use a regression discontinuity design to examine the effect of funding rule requirements on employer withdrawals from multiemployer pension plans. We find that multiemployer pension plans subject to funding rule requirements are about 14 percentage points more likely to experience employer withdrawals in a 1-year period compared to plans not required to take any corrective actions. We also find that plans with ex ante employer withdrawal experiences are more vulnerable to financial shocks such as the 2008 financial crisis. Our study provides important policy implications for regulators concerning best practices to build pension plan resilience to insolvency events.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Actuarial Journal\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"121 - 147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Actuarial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2022.2041040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Actuarial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2022.2041040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多雇主固定收益养老金计划正面临严峻的资金挑战。2006年的《养老金保护法》要求精算资助比例低于80%的多雇主养老金计划必须采取纠正措施,以改善其财务健康状况。我们使用回归不连续性设计来检验资金规则要求对雇主从多雇主养老金计划中提款的影响。我们发现,与不需要采取任何纠正措施的计划相比,受资金规则要求约束的多雇主养老金计划在一年内遭遇雇主提款的可能性高出约14个百分点。我们还发现,有提前离职经历的计划更容易受到2008年金融危机等金融冲击的影响。我们的研究为监管机构提供了关于建立养老金计划应对破产事件的最佳实践的重要政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multiemployer Defined Benefit Pension Plans: Employer Withdrawals and Financial Vulnerability
Multiemployer defined benefit pension plans are facing severe funding challenges. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 requires that a multiemployer pension plan with an actuarial funded percentage of less than 80% must take corrective actions to improve its financial health. We use a regression discontinuity design to examine the effect of funding rule requirements on employer withdrawals from multiemployer pension plans. We find that multiemployer pension plans subject to funding rule requirements are about 14 percentage points more likely to experience employer withdrawals in a 1-year period compared to plans not required to take any corrective actions. We also find that plans with ex ante employer withdrawal experiences are more vulnerable to financial shocks such as the 2008 financial crisis. Our study provides important policy implications for regulators concerning best practices to build pension plan resilience to insolvency events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
A Proposed Condition-Based Risk Adjustment System for the Colombian Health Insurance Program Credibility Theory for Variance Premium Principle Discussion on “Sample Size Determination for Credibility Estimation,” by Liang Hong, Volume 26(4) Author’s Reply to Discussion on “Sample Size Determination for Credibility Estimation” Bequests and the Demand for Life Insurance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1