再谈神经精神分析的临床研究

Q3 Psychology Neuropsychoanalysis Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/15294145.2022.2056907
H.T.W. Boerboom
{"title":"再谈神经精神分析的临床研究","authors":"H.T.W. Boerboom","doi":"10.1080/15294145.2022.2056907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Twenty years ago, Kaplan-Solms and Solms (K-S&S) published Clinical Studies in Neuro-Psychoanalysis. The subtitle must have surprised many: “Introduction to a depth neuropsychology.” In their book, a new way of looking at the effect of brain lesions was introduced; new for most readers except, perhaps, for those who had studied and followed the work of Alexander Luria, the Russian neurologist who had studied Freud. The book was seen as tackling the implicit challenge posed by Freud in 1895, when he abandoned his “Project.” It showed that the time for combining neurology and psychoanalysis had come (Reiser, 2002). This new book, a revisiting of the subject, no longer hyphenated, is an interesting blend of history and contemporary science. It consists of three parts: an intro and an outro, eight case histories, and three chapters that each show a road from different “schools” of psychoanalysis to neuropsychoanalysis. The meat, muscles, of the book are eight case-histories; the structure, or bones, of the book are the introduction and final thoughts; the sinews that bind these together are three “Neuropsychoanalyses.” The whole body shows where the depth neuropsychology, introduced by the authors (K-S&S) now stands as “Project Neuropsychoanalysis.” My scientific interest in psychoanalysis dates back to the seventies of the last century, the period in which articles indicating a brewing crisis within the world of psychoanalysis were published (see, for example, Freud, 1976; Green, 1975; Rangell, 1975; Shengold, 1976). There were many different schools, each sure that their interpretation of Freud was the right one. On top of that internal debate came a struggle for survival for psychoanalysis itself. The rise of CBT and medication, both cheaper and scientifically more acceptable, meant that psychoanalytic therapy was losing patients. And patients, the subjects of therapy, were the only source of psychoanalytic theory and of income for the therapists). Psychoanalysis retreated from the scientific world, from universities. This was the world into which Mark Solms entered when starting his neuropsychological studies in the eighties.","PeriodicalId":39493,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychoanalysis","volume":"24 1","pages":"111 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Studies in Neuropsychoanalysis Revisited\",\"authors\":\"H.T.W. Boerboom\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15294145.2022.2056907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Twenty years ago, Kaplan-Solms and Solms (K-S&S) published Clinical Studies in Neuro-Psychoanalysis. The subtitle must have surprised many: “Introduction to a depth neuropsychology.” In their book, a new way of looking at the effect of brain lesions was introduced; new for most readers except, perhaps, for those who had studied and followed the work of Alexander Luria, the Russian neurologist who had studied Freud. The book was seen as tackling the implicit challenge posed by Freud in 1895, when he abandoned his “Project.” It showed that the time for combining neurology and psychoanalysis had come (Reiser, 2002). This new book, a revisiting of the subject, no longer hyphenated, is an interesting blend of history and contemporary science. It consists of three parts: an intro and an outro, eight case histories, and three chapters that each show a road from different “schools” of psychoanalysis to neuropsychoanalysis. The meat, muscles, of the book are eight case-histories; the structure, or bones, of the book are the introduction and final thoughts; the sinews that bind these together are three “Neuropsychoanalyses.” The whole body shows where the depth neuropsychology, introduced by the authors (K-S&S) now stands as “Project Neuropsychoanalysis.” My scientific interest in psychoanalysis dates back to the seventies of the last century, the period in which articles indicating a brewing crisis within the world of psychoanalysis were published (see, for example, Freud, 1976; Green, 1975; Rangell, 1975; Shengold, 1976). There were many different schools, each sure that their interpretation of Freud was the right one. On top of that internal debate came a struggle for survival for psychoanalysis itself. The rise of CBT and medication, both cheaper and scientifically more acceptable, meant that psychoanalytic therapy was losing patients. And patients, the subjects of therapy, were the only source of psychoanalytic theory and of income for the therapists). Psychoanalysis retreated from the scientific world, from universities. This was the world into which Mark Solms entered when starting his neuropsychological studies in the eighties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychoanalysis\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"111 - 115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychoanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145.2022.2056907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145.2022.2056907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20年前,Kaplan Solms和Solms(K-S&S)发表了《神经心理分析临床研究》。副标题一定让许多人感到惊讶:“深度神经心理学导论。”在他们的书中,介绍了一种观察大脑损伤影响的新方法;对于大多数读者来说,这是新的,除了那些研究过并追随过弗洛伊德的俄罗斯神经学家亚历山大·卢里亚的作品的人。这本书被认为是在应对弗洛伊德在1895年提出的隐含挑战,当时他放弃了自己的“计划”。它表明,将神经病学和精神分析相结合的时代已经到来(Reiser,2002)。这本新书重新审视了这个主题,不再用连字符,是历史和当代科学的有趣融合。它由三个部分组成:一个介绍和一个概述,八个案例历史,以及三个章节,每个章节都展示了从不同的精神分析“学派”到神经心理分析的道路。这本书的内容是八个案例历史;这本书的结构或骨骼是引言和最后的思想;将这些联系在一起的肌腱是三种“神经心理学分析”。全身显示了作者(K-S&S)引入的深度神经心理学现在所处的位置,即“神经心理学项目”。我对精神分析的科学兴趣可以追溯到上世纪70年代,表明精神分析世界中正在酝酿的危机的文章发表的时期(例如,见弗洛伊德,1976;格林,1975;兰格尔,1975;盛戈尔德,1976)。有许多不同的学派,每个学派都确信他们对弗洛伊德的解释是正确的。在这场内部争论之上,是精神分析本身为生存而进行的斗争。CBT和药物的兴起,既便宜又科学上更容易接受,意味着精神分析疗法正在失去患者。而作为治疗对象的患者是精神分析理论和治疗师收入的唯一来源)。心理分析从科学界和大学中退了出来。这就是马克·索尔姆斯在80年代开始神经心理学研究时所进入的世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Studies in Neuropsychoanalysis Revisited
Twenty years ago, Kaplan-Solms and Solms (K-S&S) published Clinical Studies in Neuro-Psychoanalysis. The subtitle must have surprised many: “Introduction to a depth neuropsychology.” In their book, a new way of looking at the effect of brain lesions was introduced; new for most readers except, perhaps, for those who had studied and followed the work of Alexander Luria, the Russian neurologist who had studied Freud. The book was seen as tackling the implicit challenge posed by Freud in 1895, when he abandoned his “Project.” It showed that the time for combining neurology and psychoanalysis had come (Reiser, 2002). This new book, a revisiting of the subject, no longer hyphenated, is an interesting blend of history and contemporary science. It consists of three parts: an intro and an outro, eight case histories, and three chapters that each show a road from different “schools” of psychoanalysis to neuropsychoanalysis. The meat, muscles, of the book are eight case-histories; the structure, or bones, of the book are the introduction and final thoughts; the sinews that bind these together are three “Neuropsychoanalyses.” The whole body shows where the depth neuropsychology, introduced by the authors (K-S&S) now stands as “Project Neuropsychoanalysis.” My scientific interest in psychoanalysis dates back to the seventies of the last century, the period in which articles indicating a brewing crisis within the world of psychoanalysis were published (see, for example, Freud, 1976; Green, 1975; Rangell, 1975; Shengold, 1976). There were many different schools, each sure that their interpretation of Freud was the right one. On top of that internal debate came a struggle for survival for psychoanalysis itself. The rise of CBT and medication, both cheaper and scientifically more acceptable, meant that psychoanalytic therapy was losing patients. And patients, the subjects of therapy, were the only source of psychoanalytic theory and of income for the therapists). Psychoanalysis retreated from the scientific world, from universities. This was the world into which Mark Solms entered when starting his neuropsychological studies in the eighties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychoanalysis
Neuropsychoanalysis Psychology-Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
A psychological “how-possibly” model of repression Celebration of the 25th anniversary of Neuropsychoanalysis : Saturday, December 2, 2023 Reply to commentaries – the separation distress hypothesis of depression – an update and systematic review Freudian concepts in the twenty-first century: a neuropsychoanalytic update and discussion Abstracts from the 2023 NPSA Congress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1