田纳西州Promise奖学金获得者选择和提前离开的预测因素调查的开发和验证

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of College Student Development Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1353/csd.2023.a901174
J. P. Biddix, Gresham D. Collom
{"title":"田纳西州Promise奖学金获得者选择和提前离开的预测因素调查的开发和验证","authors":"J. P. Biddix, Gresham D. Collom","doi":"10.1353/csd.2023.a901174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decision to attend community or technical college is influenced by a variety of individual and institutional factors, including financial barriers, academic preparation and selfefficacy, and support structures (Perna, 2006). To address the cost of college, the most consistent barrier to enrollment for students (Kelchen et al., 2017; Kinzie et al., 2004), several states and individual institutions introduced “free” college, or “promise” initiatives (Perna et al., 2017). Early research on these programs has shown that although enrollment rates increased (Collom, 2022; Jaggars, 2020), traditionally underserved students, including low-income and marginalized populations, still face significant barriers (Collom et al., 2021; Perna et al., 2021). Many of these factors persist beyond the initial barrier of enrolling in college and influence the decision to drop out. To date, no survey instruments specific to the college choice and early departure process within the context of promise programs have been published. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an instrument to reveal factors affecting college choice and early community or technical college departure among promiseeligible students. The instrument was developed using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design (Creswell & Plano-Clark, 2017), where the results of an initial exploratory qualitative phase were used to develop and validate a survey in a sequential quantitative phase (Biddix, 2018; Greene et al., 1989). The resulting instrument may be used by student and academic affairs professionals, especially in admissions, advising, and retention, to understand factors that specifically affect college choice and departure for this population. In addition, such understanding bears implications for policy, practice, and research on student success.","PeriodicalId":15454,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Student Development","volume":"64 1","pages":"364 - 369"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a Survey to Identify Predictors of Choice and Early Departure Among Tennessee Promise Scholarship Recipients\",\"authors\":\"J. P. Biddix, Gresham D. Collom\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/csd.2023.a901174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The decision to attend community or technical college is influenced by a variety of individual and institutional factors, including financial barriers, academic preparation and selfefficacy, and support structures (Perna, 2006). To address the cost of college, the most consistent barrier to enrollment for students (Kelchen et al., 2017; Kinzie et al., 2004), several states and individual institutions introduced “free” college, or “promise” initiatives (Perna et al., 2017). Early research on these programs has shown that although enrollment rates increased (Collom, 2022; Jaggars, 2020), traditionally underserved students, including low-income and marginalized populations, still face significant barriers (Collom et al., 2021; Perna et al., 2021). Many of these factors persist beyond the initial barrier of enrolling in college and influence the decision to drop out. To date, no survey instruments specific to the college choice and early departure process within the context of promise programs have been published. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an instrument to reveal factors affecting college choice and early community or technical college departure among promiseeligible students. The instrument was developed using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design (Creswell & Plano-Clark, 2017), where the results of an initial exploratory qualitative phase were used to develop and validate a survey in a sequential quantitative phase (Biddix, 2018; Greene et al., 1989). The resulting instrument may be used by student and academic affairs professionals, especially in admissions, advising, and retention, to understand factors that specifically affect college choice and departure for this population. In addition, such understanding bears implications for policy, practice, and research on student success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of College Student Development\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"364 - 369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of College Student Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2023.a901174\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Student Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2023.a901174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上社区或技术学院的决定受到各种个人和制度因素的影响,包括经济障碍、学术准备和自我效能以及支持结构(Perna,2006)。为了解决大学成本这一学生入学最一致的障碍(Kelchen等人,2017;Kinzie等人,2004年),几个州和个别机构推出了“免费”大学或“承诺”倡议(Perna等人,2017)。对这些项目的早期研究表明,尽管入学率有所提高(Collom,2022;Jaggars,2020),但传统上服务不足的学生,包括低收入和边缘化人群,仍然面临着巨大的障碍(Collo姆等人,2021;Perna等人,2021)。其中许多因素在进入大学的最初障碍之外仍然存在,并影响退学的决定。到目前为止,还没有公布任何关于承诺项目背景下的大学选择和提前离校过程的调查工具。本研究的目的是开发和验证一种工具,以揭示影响有潜力学生的大学选择和早期社区或技术学院离校的因素。该仪器是使用顺序探索混合方法设计开发的(Creswell&Plano-Clark,2017),其中初始探索定性阶段的结果用于在顺序定量阶段开发和验证调查(Biddix,2018;Greene等人,1989)。学生和学术事务专业人员,特别是在招生、咨询和保留方面,可以使用由此产生的工具来了解具体影响这一人群的大学选择和离校的因素。此外,这种理解对学生成功的政策、实践和研究也有启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and Validation of a Survey to Identify Predictors of Choice and Early Departure Among Tennessee Promise Scholarship Recipients
The decision to attend community or technical college is influenced by a variety of individual and institutional factors, including financial barriers, academic preparation and selfefficacy, and support structures (Perna, 2006). To address the cost of college, the most consistent barrier to enrollment for students (Kelchen et al., 2017; Kinzie et al., 2004), several states and individual institutions introduced “free” college, or “promise” initiatives (Perna et al., 2017). Early research on these programs has shown that although enrollment rates increased (Collom, 2022; Jaggars, 2020), traditionally underserved students, including low-income and marginalized populations, still face significant barriers (Collom et al., 2021; Perna et al., 2021). Many of these factors persist beyond the initial barrier of enrolling in college and influence the decision to drop out. To date, no survey instruments specific to the college choice and early departure process within the context of promise programs have been published. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an instrument to reveal factors affecting college choice and early community or technical college departure among promiseeligible students. The instrument was developed using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design (Creswell & Plano-Clark, 2017), where the results of an initial exploratory qualitative phase were used to develop and validate a survey in a sequential quantitative phase (Biddix, 2018; Greene et al., 1989). The resulting instrument may be used by student and academic affairs professionals, especially in admissions, advising, and retention, to understand factors that specifically affect college choice and departure for this population. In addition, such understanding bears implications for policy, practice, and research on student success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Published six times per year for the American College Personnel Association.Founded in 1959, the Journal of College Student Development has been the leading source of research about college students and the field of student affairs for over four decades. JCSD is the largest empirical research journal in the field of student affairs and higher education, and is the official journal of the American College Personnel Association.
期刊最新文献
Black Men's Belongingness at Hispanic-Serving Institutions: Examining the Campus Environment and Culturally Engaging Practices Latina Undergraduates on the Path to Becoming Exitosas on Their Own Terms Messaging About Race: Exploring Sorority and Fraternity Social Media Test-Free Admissions at Selective Institutions: Perspectives From Admissions Professionals Negotiation Spaces: Interrogating Black Men Doctoral Students' Experiences Using Cross and Fhagen-Smith's Black Identity Development Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1