特刊:当代俄罗斯:发展与转型简介

IF 0.9 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY 中国社会科学 Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/02529203.2021.2003600
Shen Shiliang
{"title":"特刊:当代俄罗斯:发展与转型简介","authors":"Shen Shiliang","doi":"10.1080/02529203.2021.2003600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thirty years ago, the world’s socialist camp began to disintegrate, the landmark event being the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of 1991. Notwithstanding, China, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Vietnam, and Cuba adhered to the socialist road and carried out distinctive socialist reforms in accordance with their own national conditions, achieving varying degrees of success. At the same time, Mongolia and the Soviet countries, including Russia, abandoned socialism and implemented comprehensive transformations in the political, diplomatic, economic, and social fields. Eastern European countries and the former Soviet Union’s Baltic states quickly joined NATO after shifting their political and diplomatic focus to the West and began to show hostility to Russia in military terms. This abrupt change in military relations was the inevitable result of their political and diplomatic transformation. Many years ago, a popular saying circulated to the effect that political transformation takes several days, diplomatic transformation several weeks, economic transformation several months, and social transformation several years. However, this adage may apply to small Eastern European countries, but it does not apply to Russia. It has taken Russia more than ten years to complete the “four transformations,” but it has not yet embarked on a “Russian path” with its own characteristics. Political transformation In terms of political transformation, it took Russia more than two years, starting from the August 19th incident in 1991, to remove “Soviet,” “Socialist” and “Union” from the “Union of Soviet Socialist Republics,” the three core terms denoting the USSR political system. The removal of the three words represented the completion of Russia’s political transformation, marking the formation of a bureaucratic capitalist system. In return for the support provided by the “seven oligarchs,” Yeltsin, the then President of Russia, not only involved them in political and personnel decision-making, but also awarded them senior government posts. For example, one of the seven oligarchs, Vladimir Potanin, served as the First Deputy Prime Minister of the federal government overseeing Russia’s economic reforms, and Boris Berezovsky, another of the seven oligarchs, was a former Deputy Secretary of the Federal Security Council and oversaw national security affairs.","PeriodicalId":51743,"journal":{"name":"中国社会科学","volume":"42 1","pages":"153 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SPECIAL ISSUE: Contemporary Russia: Development and Transformation Introduction\",\"authors\":\"Shen Shiliang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02529203.2021.2003600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thirty years ago, the world’s socialist camp began to disintegrate, the landmark event being the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of 1991. Notwithstanding, China, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Vietnam, and Cuba adhered to the socialist road and carried out distinctive socialist reforms in accordance with their own national conditions, achieving varying degrees of success. At the same time, Mongolia and the Soviet countries, including Russia, abandoned socialism and implemented comprehensive transformations in the political, diplomatic, economic, and social fields. Eastern European countries and the former Soviet Union’s Baltic states quickly joined NATO after shifting their political and diplomatic focus to the West and began to show hostility to Russia in military terms. This abrupt change in military relations was the inevitable result of their political and diplomatic transformation. Many years ago, a popular saying circulated to the effect that political transformation takes several days, diplomatic transformation several weeks, economic transformation several months, and social transformation several years. However, this adage may apply to small Eastern European countries, but it does not apply to Russia. It has taken Russia more than ten years to complete the “four transformations,” but it has not yet embarked on a “Russian path” with its own characteristics. Political transformation In terms of political transformation, it took Russia more than two years, starting from the August 19th incident in 1991, to remove “Soviet,” “Socialist” and “Union” from the “Union of Soviet Socialist Republics,” the three core terms denoting the USSR political system. The removal of the three words represented the completion of Russia’s political transformation, marking the formation of a bureaucratic capitalist system. In return for the support provided by the “seven oligarchs,” Yeltsin, the then President of Russia, not only involved them in political and personnel decision-making, but also awarded them senior government posts. For example, one of the seven oligarchs, Vladimir Potanin, served as the First Deputy Prime Minister of the federal government overseeing Russia’s economic reforms, and Boris Berezovsky, another of the seven oligarchs, was a former Deputy Secretary of the Federal Security Council and oversaw national security affairs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国社会科学\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"153 - 157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国社会科学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2021.2003600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国社会科学","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2021.2003600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

30年前,世界社会主义阵营开始瓦解,1991年底苏联解体是一个标志性事件。但是,中国、朝鲜、越南、古巴坚持走社会主义道路,根据本国国情进行了各具特色的社会主义改革,取得了不同程度的成功。与此同时,蒙古和包括俄罗斯在内的苏联国家放弃了社会主义,在政治、外交、经济、社会等领域进行了全面的变革。东欧国家和前苏联波罗的海国家在将政治和外交重心转向西方后,迅速加入了北约,并开始在军事上对俄罗斯表现出敌意。军事关系的突然变化是两国政治和外交转型的必然结果。许多年前,流传着这样一句话:政治转型需要几天,外交转型需要几周,经济转型需要几个月,社会转型需要几年。然而,这句格言可能适用于东欧小国,但不适用于俄罗斯。俄罗斯用了十多年时间完成了“四个转型”,但尚未走出一条具有自己特色的“俄罗斯道路”。在政治转型方面,从1991年8月19日事件开始,俄罗斯用了两年多的时间,从“苏维埃社会主义共和国联盟”这三个代表苏联政治制度的核心术语中去掉了“苏维埃”、“社会主义”和“联盟”。这三个字的移除代表了俄罗斯政治转型的完成,标志着官僚资本主义制度的形成。作为对“七寡头”支持的回报,当时的俄罗斯总统叶利钦不仅让他们参与政治和人事决策,还授予他们政府高级职位。例如,七寡头之一的弗拉基米尔·波塔宁(Vladimir Potanin)曾担任负责俄罗斯经济改革的联邦政府第一副总理,七寡头中的另一位鲍里斯·别列佐夫斯基(Boris Berezovsky)曾担任联邦安全委员会副秘书,负责国家安全事务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SPECIAL ISSUE: Contemporary Russia: Development and Transformation Introduction
Thirty years ago, the world’s socialist camp began to disintegrate, the landmark event being the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of 1991. Notwithstanding, China, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Vietnam, and Cuba adhered to the socialist road and carried out distinctive socialist reforms in accordance with their own national conditions, achieving varying degrees of success. At the same time, Mongolia and the Soviet countries, including Russia, abandoned socialism and implemented comprehensive transformations in the political, diplomatic, economic, and social fields. Eastern European countries and the former Soviet Union’s Baltic states quickly joined NATO after shifting their political and diplomatic focus to the West and began to show hostility to Russia in military terms. This abrupt change in military relations was the inevitable result of their political and diplomatic transformation. Many years ago, a popular saying circulated to the effect that political transformation takes several days, diplomatic transformation several weeks, economic transformation several months, and social transformation several years. However, this adage may apply to small Eastern European countries, but it does not apply to Russia. It has taken Russia more than ten years to complete the “four transformations,” but it has not yet embarked on a “Russian path” with its own characteristics. Political transformation In terms of political transformation, it took Russia more than two years, starting from the August 19th incident in 1991, to remove “Soviet,” “Socialist” and “Union” from the “Union of Soviet Socialist Republics,” the three core terms denoting the USSR political system. The removal of the three words represented the completion of Russia’s political transformation, marking the formation of a bureaucratic capitalist system. In return for the support provided by the “seven oligarchs,” Yeltsin, the then President of Russia, not only involved them in political and personnel decision-making, but also awarded them senior government posts. For example, one of the seven oligarchs, Vladimir Potanin, served as the First Deputy Prime Minister of the federal government overseeing Russia’s economic reforms, and Boris Berezovsky, another of the seven oligarchs, was a former Deputy Secretary of the Federal Security Council and oversaw national security affairs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国社会科学
中国社会科学 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5101
期刊介绍: Social Sciences in China Press (SSCP) was established in 1979, directly under the administration of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS). Currently, SSCP publishes seven journals, one academic newspaper and an English epaper .
期刊最新文献
The Hierarchy of Distribution in Private Law How Does the Government Facilitate the Co-Production of Digital Public Safety Services?—Based on Empirical Evidence from Shenzhen How Does the Internet Impact the Public’s Perception of Information Security Risk? From Structural Imbalance to Structural Optimization: A Theoretical Analysis for Establishing a Modern Tax System Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence for Social Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1