The use of budget UAV systems and GIS spatial analysis in cadastral and construction surveying for building planning

The uncertainty that comes with planning, constructing, and maintaining buildings is a constant issue for architects and civil engineers. As topography is the framework that unites architecture and landscape, the design and planning projects heavily rely on a range of monitoring, surveying methods and comprehensive field data. Along with the traditional topo-geodetic instrumentation used in land and construction surveying, unmanned aerial vehicles equipped with digital cameras and structure from motion software have been increasingly used recently in a variety of fields to create high-resolution digital elevation models. Despite this widespread use, in the majority of surveying projects it is considered that the topographic representations produced through this technology is inferior to that obtained with surveys conducted using conventional methods, along with other constraints imposed by legislation, environment and weather conditions. While certain limitations of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems are challenging, their advantage for gathering data from a different perspective and the generated outputs have the potential to significantly advance the construction industry. The present article provides an overview of the usefulness of budget UAV systems in developing a methodology that accompanies the conventional survey process for civil engineering applications. Thus, along with the established survey for cadastral and technical documentations necessary for the architectural process, a complementary UAV survey was developed, with subsequent spatial analysis in a geographic information system (GIS), in order to expand the array of deliverables. These include useful orthophoto map, larger-scale and denser representations of the topography, digital surface and terrain models, slope, aspect and solar radiation maps which will offer helpful information and instructions at the start of the construction planning process. The methodology contains two case studies with different degrees of terrain and vegetation challenges, and also presents an accuracy assessment and overall benefits discussion regarding the UAV implementation.