从转瞬即逝到基于应用程序的记录:为新生儿医生分配翻身位置的做法是否导致了社会差异?

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning Pub Date : 2020-11-10 DOI:10.18261/issn.1504-291x-2020-04-02
Ida Drange
{"title":"从转瞬即逝到基于应用程序的记录:为新生儿医生分配翻身位置的做法是否导致了社会差异?","authors":"Ida Drange","doi":"10.18261/issn.1504-291x-2020-04-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical students have high social origins and a high rate of social reproduction. Yet, in the labour market, physicians are an egalitarian occupational group, with minor internal differences. Hence, high social origins provide a compet-itive advantage in admission to medical school, but not in the medical labour market. After years with a shortfall of physicians, the prospect is an oversupply of physicians, putting pressure on the internship arrangement. In response, the health authorities changed the rules for internship training. From 2013 onwards, the distribution of internships is through job listings, applications and hires. This replaces the previous arrangement, which used a lottery system. An application-based system can provide physicians from high social origins with an advantage in the transition from education to work. The rule change introduces a natural experiment into the medical labour market. I use theories about social inequality and discrimination theories to deduce three hypotheses concerning unequal access to internship positions according to candidates’ social background, gender and foreign background. I use administra-tive register data in my inquiries. The results show a significantly higher likelihood for university hospital employment among doctors with higher social background, and a clear tendency towards increased inequalities according to demographic characteristics.","PeriodicalId":43822,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fra loddtrekning til søknadsbasert opptak: Har endret praksis for tildeling av turnusstillinger til nyutdannede leger ført til sosial ulikhet?\",\"authors\":\"Ida Drange\",\"doi\":\"10.18261/issn.1504-291x-2020-04-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Medical students have high social origins and a high rate of social reproduction. Yet, in the labour market, physicians are an egalitarian occupational group, with minor internal differences. Hence, high social origins provide a compet-itive advantage in admission to medical school, but not in the medical labour market. After years with a shortfall of physicians, the prospect is an oversupply of physicians, putting pressure on the internship arrangement. In response, the health authorities changed the rules for internship training. From 2013 onwards, the distribution of internships is through job listings, applications and hires. This replaces the previous arrangement, which used a lottery system. An application-based system can provide physicians from high social origins with an advantage in the transition from education to work. The rule change introduces a natural experiment into the medical labour market. I use theories about social inequality and discrimination theories to deduce three hypotheses concerning unequal access to internship positions according to candidates’ social background, gender and foreign background. I use administra-tive register data in my inquiries. The results show a significantly higher likelihood for university hospital employment among doctors with higher social background, and a clear tendency towards increased inequalities according to demographic characteristics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-291x-2020-04-02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-291x-2020-04-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学生具有较高的社会出身和较高的社会再生产率。然而,在劳动力市场上,医生是一个平等的职业群体,内部差异很小。因此,高社会出身提供了进入医学院的竞争优势,但在医疗劳动力市场上却没有。在医生短缺多年后,医生供应过剩的前景给实习安排带来了压力。作为回应,卫生当局改变了实习培训的规则。从2013年起,实习机会的分配是通过职位列表、申请和招聘进行的。这取代了之前使用彩票系统的安排。基于应用程序的系统可以为社会出身较高的医生提供从教育到工作的过渡优势。规则的改变为医疗劳动力市场引入了一个自然的实验。我运用社会不平等理论和歧视理论,根据求职者的社会背景、性别和外国背景,推导出三个关于实习机会不平等的假设。我在查询中使用管理注册数据。结果显示,社会背景较高的医生在大学医院就业的可能性明显更高,而且根据人口特征,不平等现象明显加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fra loddtrekning til søknadsbasert opptak: Har endret praksis for tildeling av turnusstillinger til nyutdannede leger ført til sosial ulikhet?
Medical students have high social origins and a high rate of social reproduction. Yet, in the labour market, physicians are an egalitarian occupational group, with minor internal differences. Hence, high social origins provide a compet-itive advantage in admission to medical school, but not in the medical labour market. After years with a shortfall of physicians, the prospect is an oversupply of physicians, putting pressure on the internship arrangement. In response, the health authorities changed the rules for internship training. From 2013 onwards, the distribution of internships is through job listings, applications and hires. This replaces the previous arrangement, which used a lottery system. An application-based system can provide physicians from high social origins with an advantage in the transition from education to work. The rule change introduces a natural experiment into the medical labour market. I use theories about social inequality and discrimination theories to deduce three hypotheses concerning unequal access to internship positions according to candidates’ social background, gender and foreign background. I use administra-tive register data in my inquiries. The results show a significantly higher likelihood for university hospital employment among doctors with higher social background, and a clear tendency towards increased inequalities according to demographic characteristics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning
Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning presenterer resultater fra dagsaktuelle samfunnsvitenskapelige undersøkelser for et bredere publikum, og kommer ut fire ganger i året. Hovedvekten er lagt på publisering av originalartikler av norske samfunnsforskere, basert på empiriske undersøkelser. Tidsskriftet bringer også kunnskapsoversikter, debattstoff, forskningspolitiske innlegg, notiser og bokanmeldelser. Det gis også ut spesielle temanummer. Tidsskriftet utkom første gang i 1960, og utgis i samarbeid med Universitetsforlaget.
期刊最新文献
For gammel til jobbintervju? Politiets krise- og gisselforhandleres brudd med operativ politikultur Covid-19 blant gjestearbeidere i Norge Byrom i skvis: Mellom attraksjon og interaksjon Affektiv polarisering i Norden – en oversikt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1