数字时代海事研究课程的质量设计

IF 3.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION Maritime Policy & Management Pub Date : 2021-10-09 DOI:10.1080/03088839.2021.1983220
L. Koh, Kevin X. Li, Ying Ying. Chia, Kum Fai Yuen
{"title":"数字时代海事研究课程的质量设计","authors":"L. Koh, Kevin X. Li, Ying Ying. Chia, Kum Fai Yuen","doi":"10.1080/03088839.2021.1983220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Competition among academic institutions for students and Industry 4.0 have spurred institutions to actively improve undergraduates’ learning experiences and outcomes. The objectives of this research are to identify the quality dimensions of maritime studies programmes from students’ perspectives and examine their impacts on learning outcomes which include satisfaction, engagement, and academic performance. After reviewing the literature, six quality dimensions containing 29 measurement items were generated. An online survey was conducted on maritime students from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Thereafter, exploratory factor analysis and path analysis were used to analyse the survey data. The exploratory factor analysis produces a six-factor solution that confirms the proposed quality dimensions. Further, the quality dimension with the most impact on student satisfaction is (1) technology integration, followed by (2) industrial exposure, (3) learning and teaching environment, (4) industry-aligned & innovative curriculum, (5) faculty member competencies, and finally (6) supporting activities. In addition, student satisfaction positively influences engagement and academic performance. Further, engagement positively influences academic performance. The developed quality dimension model can serve as a measurement tool for maritime institutions to assess the quality of their programme and update their curriculums respectively to meet students’ expectations and learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":18288,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Policy & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality design for maritime studies programme in the digital era\",\"authors\":\"L. Koh, Kevin X. Li, Ying Ying. Chia, Kum Fai Yuen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03088839.2021.1983220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Competition among academic institutions for students and Industry 4.0 have spurred institutions to actively improve undergraduates’ learning experiences and outcomes. The objectives of this research are to identify the quality dimensions of maritime studies programmes from students’ perspectives and examine their impacts on learning outcomes which include satisfaction, engagement, and academic performance. After reviewing the literature, six quality dimensions containing 29 measurement items were generated. An online survey was conducted on maritime students from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Thereafter, exploratory factor analysis and path analysis were used to analyse the survey data. The exploratory factor analysis produces a six-factor solution that confirms the proposed quality dimensions. Further, the quality dimension with the most impact on student satisfaction is (1) technology integration, followed by (2) industrial exposure, (3) learning and teaching environment, (4) industry-aligned & innovative curriculum, (5) faculty member competencies, and finally (6) supporting activities. In addition, student satisfaction positively influences engagement and academic performance. Further, engagement positively influences academic performance. The developed quality dimension model can serve as a measurement tool for maritime institutions to assess the quality of their programme and update their curriculums respectively to meet students’ expectations and learning outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maritime Policy & Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maritime Policy & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1983220\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maritime Policy & Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1983220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

高校之间的生源竞争和工业4.0促使高校积极改善本科生的学习体验和成果。本研究的目的是从学生的角度确定海事研究课程的质量维度,并检查其对学习成果的影响,包括满意度、参与度和学习成绩。在回顾文献后,生成了包含29个测量项目的6个质量维度。一项针对新加坡南洋理工大学海事专业学生的在线调查。随后,采用探索性因子分析和通径分析对调查数据进行分析。探索性因素分析产生一个六因素的解决方案,确认提出的质量维度。此外,对学生满意度影响最大的质量维度是(1)技术整合,其次是(2)行业接触,(3)学习和教学环境,(4)行业一致和创新的课程,(5)教师能力,最后(6)支持活动。此外,学生满意度正向影响投入和学业成绩。此外,投入对学习成绩有积极影响。开发的质量维度模型可以作为海事院校评估其课程质量和更新课程的测量工具,以满足学生的期望和学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality design for maritime studies programme in the digital era
ABSTRACT Competition among academic institutions for students and Industry 4.0 have spurred institutions to actively improve undergraduates’ learning experiences and outcomes. The objectives of this research are to identify the quality dimensions of maritime studies programmes from students’ perspectives and examine their impacts on learning outcomes which include satisfaction, engagement, and academic performance. After reviewing the literature, six quality dimensions containing 29 measurement items were generated. An online survey was conducted on maritime students from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Thereafter, exploratory factor analysis and path analysis were used to analyse the survey data. The exploratory factor analysis produces a six-factor solution that confirms the proposed quality dimensions. Further, the quality dimension with the most impact on student satisfaction is (1) technology integration, followed by (2) industrial exposure, (3) learning and teaching environment, (4) industry-aligned & innovative curriculum, (5) faculty member competencies, and finally (6) supporting activities. In addition, student satisfaction positively influences engagement and academic performance. Further, engagement positively influences academic performance. The developed quality dimension model can serve as a measurement tool for maritime institutions to assess the quality of their programme and update their curriculums respectively to meet students’ expectations and learning outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.60%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Thirty years ago maritime management decisions were taken on the basis of experience and hunch. Today, the experience is augmented by expert analysis and informed by research findings. Maritime Policy & Management provides the latest findings and analyses, and the opportunity for exchanging views through its Comment Section. A multi-disciplinary and international refereed journal, it brings together papers on the different topics that concern the maritime industry. Emphasis is placed on business, organizational, economic, sociolegal and management topics at port, community, shipping company and shipboard levels. The Journal also provides details of conferences and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Special issue on “Green Port and Maritime Shipping” A New wine in new wineskins: unfolding dimension of port-hinterland connectivity and market shares Dividend payments and dividend smoothing in shipping companies The role of port smartness in achieving sustainable development goals Measuring the dynamic term structure of the FFA market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1