资优教育的国家政策和资助

Q2 Social Sciences Gifted Child Today Pub Date : 2022-09-09 DOI:10.1177/10762175221110938
Norma L. Hafenstein, Vicki Boley, Joi Lin
{"title":"资优教育的国家政策和资助","authors":"Norma L. Hafenstein, Vicki Boley, Joi Lin","doi":"10.1177/10762175221110938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy and funding influence equitable education for students who are gifted. The concept of equity is examined through variations in policy and in funding at the state, district, and local levels. Challenges and barriers to equity in policy and funding include policy structures, where policy provides guidance without accountability measures, or where policy does include systemic evaluation for improvement. Examples have been drawn from four different states in different areas of the United States and multiple examples from various districts are presented. State level mandates for identification of and service to gifted learners are presented, including those following the Exceptional Children’s Education Act and those not. Variations in definitions of gifted are articulated. District level policies, demonstrating local control, illustrate ranges of service and guidance. Examples of the broad range of funding available for gifted programming are articulated and include base funding as well as formulaic metrics. Adequate resources for equitable gifted education are explored by considering expenditures and allocations of funding, frequently dependent on locale, school size, and economic resources. A call for action suggests practices to improve equity in gifted education include building and implementing strong advocacy skills, pursuing fiscal support for services for gifted learners, and committing to a professional developed workforce through formal and informal professional learning for educators and policymakers. Educator attitudes and beliefs and public perceptions that may perpetuate myths are examined in relation to equitable services for gifted students.","PeriodicalId":52204,"journal":{"name":"Gifted Child Today","volume":"45 1","pages":"226 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State Policy and Funding in Gifted Education\",\"authors\":\"Norma L. Hafenstein, Vicki Boley, Joi Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10762175221110938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Policy and funding influence equitable education for students who are gifted. The concept of equity is examined through variations in policy and in funding at the state, district, and local levels. Challenges and barriers to equity in policy and funding include policy structures, where policy provides guidance without accountability measures, or where policy does include systemic evaluation for improvement. Examples have been drawn from four different states in different areas of the United States and multiple examples from various districts are presented. State level mandates for identification of and service to gifted learners are presented, including those following the Exceptional Children’s Education Act and those not. Variations in definitions of gifted are articulated. District level policies, demonstrating local control, illustrate ranges of service and guidance. Examples of the broad range of funding available for gifted programming are articulated and include base funding as well as formulaic metrics. Adequate resources for equitable gifted education are explored by considering expenditures and allocations of funding, frequently dependent on locale, school size, and economic resources. A call for action suggests practices to improve equity in gifted education include building and implementing strong advocacy skills, pursuing fiscal support for services for gifted learners, and committing to a professional developed workforce through formal and informal professional learning for educators and policymakers. Educator attitudes and beliefs and public perceptions that may perpetuate myths are examined in relation to equitable services for gifted students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gifted Child Today\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"226 - 234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gifted Child Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175221110938\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gifted Child Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175221110938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政策和资金会影响天才学生的公平教育。公平的概念是通过州、地区和地方各级政策和资金的变化来检验的。政策和资金公平方面的挑战和障碍包括政策结构,即政策提供指导而没有问责措施,或者政策确实包括系统评估以进行改进。从美国不同地区的四个不同州抽取了例子,并提出了来自不同地区的多个例子。州一级的授权,以识别和服务的天才学习者提出,包括那些遵循特殊儿童教育法和那些没有。有天赋的定义的变化是明确的。地区一级的政策,展示地方控制,说明服务和指导的范围。对于天才编程的广泛资助范围的例子是明确的,包括基础资金以及公式化的指标。通过考虑支出和资金分配,通常取决于地点、学校规模和经济资源,来探索公平的资优教育的充足资源。一项行动呼吁建议,改善资优教育公平性的做法包括建立和实施强有力的宣传技能,寻求对资优学习者服务的财政支持,并通过为教育工作者和政策制定者提供正式和非正式的专业学习,致力于培养专业发展的劳动力。教育工作者的态度和信念以及公众的看法可能使神话永久化,这与为资优学生提供公平的服务有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
State Policy and Funding in Gifted Education
Policy and funding influence equitable education for students who are gifted. The concept of equity is examined through variations in policy and in funding at the state, district, and local levels. Challenges and barriers to equity in policy and funding include policy structures, where policy provides guidance without accountability measures, or where policy does include systemic evaluation for improvement. Examples have been drawn from four different states in different areas of the United States and multiple examples from various districts are presented. State level mandates for identification of and service to gifted learners are presented, including those following the Exceptional Children’s Education Act and those not. Variations in definitions of gifted are articulated. District level policies, demonstrating local control, illustrate ranges of service and guidance. Examples of the broad range of funding available for gifted programming are articulated and include base funding as well as formulaic metrics. Adequate resources for equitable gifted education are explored by considering expenditures and allocations of funding, frequently dependent on locale, school size, and economic resources. A call for action suggests practices to improve equity in gifted education include building and implementing strong advocacy skills, pursuing fiscal support for services for gifted learners, and committing to a professional developed workforce through formal and informal professional learning for educators and policymakers. Educator attitudes and beliefs and public perceptions that may perpetuate myths are examined in relation to equitable services for gifted students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gifted Child Today
Gifted Child Today Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Whither Thou Goest, Gifted Education? Contests Selecting Technically Adequate Tests Effective Identification Through Multiple Criteria Reducing Reactivity: The Influence of Classroom Mindfulness Practice on Gifted Children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1