射频热损伤与体外冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎两种方法的比较

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot and Ankle Specialist Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.1177/1938640016675408
Fırat Ozan, Şemmi Koyuncu, Kaan Gürbüz, Eyyüp Sabri Öncel, T. Altay
{"title":"射频热损伤与体外冲击波治疗足底筋膜炎两种方法的比较","authors":"Fırat Ozan, Şemmi Koyuncu, Kaan Gürbüz, Eyyüp Sabri Öncel, T. Altay","doi":"10.1177/1938640016675408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compared the results of radiofrequency thermal lesioning (RTL) and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. This prospective study included 56 patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis who had complaints for ≥6 months: 40 (group 1) underwent ESWT and 16 (group 2) underwent RTL. The presence of calcaneal spurs was investigated with imaging studies. All patients were followed up clinically at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Clinical evaluations were performed by the visual analog scale (VAS) and the modified Roles-Maudsley (RM) scoring system. There was no significant difference in the age, sex, body mass index, and side of involvement between the groups (all P > .05). Radiographic evaluation showed calcaneal spurs in 22 patients (55%) in group 1 and 7 patients (43%) in group 2. There was no significant difference in the baseline and posttreatment values between the groups; however, group 2 had significantly different RM values at 1 month than group 1 (P < .05). In both groups, the VAS scores significantly decreased at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment (P < .05). The RM scores at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment significantly decreased in both groups, except for the RM values at 1 month after treatment in group 1 (P < .05). Our study results suggest that RTL and ESWT are safe and effective treatments in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. Levels of Evidence: Level II: Therapeutic study","PeriodicalId":39271,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","volume":"10 1","pages":"204 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1938640016675408","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiofrequency Thermal Lesioning and Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy: A Comparison of Two Methods in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis\",\"authors\":\"Fırat Ozan, Şemmi Koyuncu, Kaan Gürbüz, Eyyüp Sabri Öncel, T. Altay\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1938640016675408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We compared the results of radiofrequency thermal lesioning (RTL) and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. This prospective study included 56 patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis who had complaints for ≥6 months: 40 (group 1) underwent ESWT and 16 (group 2) underwent RTL. The presence of calcaneal spurs was investigated with imaging studies. All patients were followed up clinically at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Clinical evaluations were performed by the visual analog scale (VAS) and the modified Roles-Maudsley (RM) scoring system. There was no significant difference in the age, sex, body mass index, and side of involvement between the groups (all P > .05). Radiographic evaluation showed calcaneal spurs in 22 patients (55%) in group 1 and 7 patients (43%) in group 2. There was no significant difference in the baseline and posttreatment values between the groups; however, group 2 had significantly different RM values at 1 month than group 1 (P < .05). In both groups, the VAS scores significantly decreased at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment (P < .05). The RM scores at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment significantly decreased in both groups, except for the RM values at 1 month after treatment in group 1 (P < .05). Our study results suggest that RTL and ESWT are safe and effective treatments in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. Levels of Evidence: Level II: Therapeutic study\",\"PeriodicalId\":39271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot and Ankle Specialist\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"204 - 209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1938640016675408\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot and Ankle Specialist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640016675408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640016675408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

我们比较了射频热损伤(RTL)和体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的结果。本前瞻性研究纳入56例诊断为足底筋膜炎且主病≥6个月的患者:40例(第一组)接受ESWT, 16例(第二组)接受RTL。影像学检查了跟骨刺的存在。所有患者均于治疗后1、3、6个月进行临床随访。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和改进的role - maudsley (RM)评分系统进行临床评价。两组患者在年龄、性别、体重指数、发病部位等方面均无显著差异(P < 0.05)。1组22例(55%)有跟骨刺,2组7例(43%)有跟骨刺。两组间基线值和治疗后值无显著差异;2组患者1个月时RM值与1组比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者在治疗后1、3、6个月VAS评分均显著降低(P < 0.05)。两组治疗后1、3、6个月RM评分均显著降低,除1组治疗后1个月RM评分差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。我们的研究结果表明,RTL和ESWT治疗慢性足底筋膜炎是安全有效的治疗方法。证据等级:II级:治疗性研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radiofrequency Thermal Lesioning and Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy: A Comparison of Two Methods in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis
We compared the results of radiofrequency thermal lesioning (RTL) and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. This prospective study included 56 patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis who had complaints for ≥6 months: 40 (group 1) underwent ESWT and 16 (group 2) underwent RTL. The presence of calcaneal spurs was investigated with imaging studies. All patients were followed up clinically at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Clinical evaluations were performed by the visual analog scale (VAS) and the modified Roles-Maudsley (RM) scoring system. There was no significant difference in the age, sex, body mass index, and side of involvement between the groups (all P > .05). Radiographic evaluation showed calcaneal spurs in 22 patients (55%) in group 1 and 7 patients (43%) in group 2. There was no significant difference in the baseline and posttreatment values between the groups; however, group 2 had significantly different RM values at 1 month than group 1 (P < .05). In both groups, the VAS scores significantly decreased at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment (P < .05). The RM scores at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment significantly decreased in both groups, except for the RM values at 1 month after treatment in group 1 (P < .05). Our study results suggest that RTL and ESWT are safe and effective treatments in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. Levels of Evidence: Level II: Therapeutic study
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Specialist
Foot and Ankle Specialist Health Professions-Podiatry
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
期刊最新文献
Are SER-II Ankle Fractures Anatomic? Computed Tomography Demonstrates Mortise Malalignment in the Setting of Apparently Normal Radiographs. Sleep Apnea and Postoperative Medical Complications and Health Care Expenditures Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Bimalleolar Ankle Fractures. Utilization of the Modified Lapidus Procedure for Correction of Moderate to Severe Hallux Valgus Deformity With Increased Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle. Modified Bösch Osteotomy Combined With a Percutaneous Adductor Tendon Release for the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity: Learning Curve. Outcomes Following Repeat Ankle Arthroscopy and Microfracture for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1