建立一场运动:1929-1945年社区中的美国共产主义激进主义

Q2 Arts and Humanities American Communist History Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI:10.1080/14743892.2019.1677125
Joshua J. Morris
{"title":"建立一场运动:1929-1945年社区中的美国共产主义激进主义","authors":"Joshua J. Morris","doi":"10.1080/14743892.2019.1677125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the mid-1930s, as communist community activism reached a peak, Birmingham organizer Hosea Hudson was less concerned with organizing communist-led unions as an alternative to AFL and SPA-led unemployment councils than he was with organizing churches and civic groups throughout the city against the social pillars of racism and discrimination. The local Birmingham district Communist Party, USA (CPUSA) functioned much like other Party clubs in cities without a strong industrial working base in that it was simply given orders from larger districts such as Detroit, New York, and Chicago, to get active in “mass organizations.” The way Hudson saw it, however, it was not always so easy to implement such a plan. He found that white Birmingham citizens “didn’t have no mass organization to go to, only into the unions [sic].” Black citizens, however, had their churches, their singing groups, their book clubs, and their local NAACP; many of which had cross membership, which was important to Hudson in terms of reaching out to the black community. Because of the circumstances, Hudson understood that to be an effective political force, American communists needed to direct their attention into organizing workers in a manner that paralleled rallying communities behind specific issues, such as racism. This more community-oriented struggle was unique to non-industrial towns throughout the South such as Birmingham where communists nevertheless had a presence, in addition to other areas where the ethnic tensions of workforces surfaced to be predominant barriers to organizing tactics, such as Detroit, Chicago, New York, as well as the agricultural fields of Texas and California. The community world of American Communism was distinguished from the labor world through its emphasis on local politics, culture, unemployment relief, and ending racial discrimination either a priori to or in tandem with tactics for organizing local workforces. Communist community organizer’s fight against evictions promoted large progressive reform and activism through the lens of grassroots community politics. More importantly, only by examining the individual experiences of communists in their respective communities, removed from the organizational politics of the CPUSA, Communist League of America (CLA), Communist Party (Opposition) (CP(O)) and the Workers’ Party of the United States (WPUS), can we see these varied experiences and how it links grassroots organizers together instead of separating them ideologically.","PeriodicalId":35150,"journal":{"name":"American Communist History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14743892.2019.1677125","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building a Movement: American Communist Activism in the Communities, 1929-1945\",\"authors\":\"Joshua J. Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14743892.2019.1677125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the mid-1930s, as communist community activism reached a peak, Birmingham organizer Hosea Hudson was less concerned with organizing communist-led unions as an alternative to AFL and SPA-led unemployment councils than he was with organizing churches and civic groups throughout the city against the social pillars of racism and discrimination. The local Birmingham district Communist Party, USA (CPUSA) functioned much like other Party clubs in cities without a strong industrial working base in that it was simply given orders from larger districts such as Detroit, New York, and Chicago, to get active in “mass organizations.” The way Hudson saw it, however, it was not always so easy to implement such a plan. He found that white Birmingham citizens “didn’t have no mass organization to go to, only into the unions [sic].” Black citizens, however, had their churches, their singing groups, their book clubs, and their local NAACP; many of which had cross membership, which was important to Hudson in terms of reaching out to the black community. Because of the circumstances, Hudson understood that to be an effective political force, American communists needed to direct their attention into organizing workers in a manner that paralleled rallying communities behind specific issues, such as racism. This more community-oriented struggle was unique to non-industrial towns throughout the South such as Birmingham where communists nevertheless had a presence, in addition to other areas where the ethnic tensions of workforces surfaced to be predominant barriers to organizing tactics, such as Detroit, Chicago, New York, as well as the agricultural fields of Texas and California. The community world of American Communism was distinguished from the labor world through its emphasis on local politics, culture, unemployment relief, and ending racial discrimination either a priori to or in tandem with tactics for organizing local workforces. Communist community organizer’s fight against evictions promoted large progressive reform and activism through the lens of grassroots community politics. More importantly, only by examining the individual experiences of communists in their respective communities, removed from the organizational politics of the CPUSA, Communist League of America (CLA), Communist Party (Opposition) (CP(O)) and the Workers’ Party of the United States (WPUS), can we see these varied experiences and how it links grassroots organizers together instead of separating them ideologically.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Communist History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14743892.2019.1677125\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Communist History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14743892.2019.1677125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Communist History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14743892.2019.1677125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在20世纪30年代中期,随着共产主义社区活动达到顶峰,伯明翰的组织者Hosea Hudson不太关心组织共产主义领导的工会,作为AFL和spa领导的失业委员会的替代方案,他更关心在整个城市组织教堂和公民团体,反对种族主义和歧视的社会支柱。当地的伯明翰地区美国共产党(CPUSA)的运作方式与其他没有强大工业工作基础的城市政党俱乐部非常相似,因为它只是从底特律、纽约和芝加哥等更大的地区接到命令,积极参与“群众组织”。然而,在哈德森看来,实施这样的计划并不总是那么容易。他发现伯明翰的白人公民“没有群众组织可以参加,只能加入工会。”然而,黑人公民有自己的教堂、歌唱团体、读书俱乐部和当地的全国有色人种协进会;其中很多都是交叉会员,这对哈德森接触黑人社区来说很重要。在这种情况下,哈德森明白,要成为一股有效的政治力量,美国共产党人需要把注意力集中在组织工人上,以一种类似于在种族主义等具体问题上团结社区的方式。这种更以社区为导向的斗争在整个南方的非工业城镇是独一无二的,比如伯明翰,在那里共产主义者仍然存在,此外还有其他地区,劳动力的种族紧张关系成为组织策略的主要障碍,比如底特律,芝加哥,纽约,以及德克萨斯州和加利福尼亚州的农田。美国共产主义的社区世界与劳工世界的区别在于,它强调地方政治、文化、失业救济和结束种族歧视,无论是先天的还是与组织地方劳动力的策略相结合的。共产主义社区组织者反对驱逐的斗争通过基层社区政治的镜头促进了大规模的进步改革和行动主义。更重要的是,只有通过考察共产主义者在各自社区的个人经历,脱离美国共产党(CPUSA)、美国共产主义联盟(CLA)、共产党(反对党)(CP(O))和美国工人党(WPUS)的组织政治,我们才能看到这些不同的经历,以及它如何将基层组织者联系在一起,而不是在意识形态上分开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Building a Movement: American Communist Activism in the Communities, 1929-1945
In the mid-1930s, as communist community activism reached a peak, Birmingham organizer Hosea Hudson was less concerned with organizing communist-led unions as an alternative to AFL and SPA-led unemployment councils than he was with organizing churches and civic groups throughout the city against the social pillars of racism and discrimination. The local Birmingham district Communist Party, USA (CPUSA) functioned much like other Party clubs in cities without a strong industrial working base in that it was simply given orders from larger districts such as Detroit, New York, and Chicago, to get active in “mass organizations.” The way Hudson saw it, however, it was not always so easy to implement such a plan. He found that white Birmingham citizens “didn’t have no mass organization to go to, only into the unions [sic].” Black citizens, however, had their churches, their singing groups, their book clubs, and their local NAACP; many of which had cross membership, which was important to Hudson in terms of reaching out to the black community. Because of the circumstances, Hudson understood that to be an effective political force, American communists needed to direct their attention into organizing workers in a manner that paralleled rallying communities behind specific issues, such as racism. This more community-oriented struggle was unique to non-industrial towns throughout the South such as Birmingham where communists nevertheless had a presence, in addition to other areas where the ethnic tensions of workforces surfaced to be predominant barriers to organizing tactics, such as Detroit, Chicago, New York, as well as the agricultural fields of Texas and California. The community world of American Communism was distinguished from the labor world through its emphasis on local politics, culture, unemployment relief, and ending racial discrimination either a priori to or in tandem with tactics for organizing local workforces. Communist community organizer’s fight against evictions promoted large progressive reform and activism through the lens of grassroots community politics. More importantly, only by examining the individual experiences of communists in their respective communities, removed from the organizational politics of the CPUSA, Communist League of America (CLA), Communist Party (Opposition) (CP(O)) and the Workers’ Party of the United States (WPUS), can we see these varied experiences and how it links grassroots organizers together instead of separating them ideologically.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Communist History
American Communist History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Arise! Global Radicalism in the Era of the Mexican Revolution Arise! Global Radicalism in the Era of the Mexican Revolution , by Christina Heatherton, Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2022, 336 pp., $29.95, ISBN 978-0-5202-8787-7. “Down the Left Hand Path to Perdition”: Equity, the Actors Forum, and Anti-Communism The Palgrave Handbook of Communist Women Activists Around the World The Palgrave Handbook of Communist Women Activists Around the World , by Palgrave Macmillan, 2023, ISBN 978-3-031-13126-4. Communist Women’s Activism around the World, Part 1: Global Foremothers (Review) The Palgrave Handbook of Communist Women Activists Around the World , by Palgrave Macmillan, 2023, ISBN 978-3-031-13126-4. The Trials of Paul Novick: Israel, Zionism, and the CPUSA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1