和平谈判进程和结果:从比较角度看哥伦比亚和土耳其

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Peacebuilding Pub Date : 2021-12-22 DOI:10.1080/21647259.2021.2019467
Esra Dilek, Basar Baysal
{"title":"和平谈判进程和结果:从比较角度看哥伦比亚和土耳其","authors":"Esra Dilek, Basar Baysal","doi":"10.1080/21647259.2021.2019467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Adopting a negotiation process analysis perspective, this article analyzes the peace negotiation processes in Colombia (2012–2016) and Turkey (2012–2015) with a focus on three aspects of the negotiation process: the timing of the negotiations, the actors in the negotiation process, and transparency. In the Colombian case, the formation of a clear negotiation framework at the start of official negotiations in August 2012 helped the process to stay on track until the signing of the General Agreement in 2016. Conversely, the negotiations in Turkey did not proceed based on a clear framework and stalled in 2015 amid domestic and regional developments because of a lack of clear representatives and of monitoring third parties to keep the process on track. As the Colombian case shows, the existence of a commonly agreed and clear negotiation framework may increase resilience that help mitigate the potential for domestic and external risks to derail the process.","PeriodicalId":45555,"journal":{"name":"Peacebuilding","volume":"10 1","pages":"449 - 469"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peace negotiation process and outcome: considering Colombia and Turkey in comparative perspective\",\"authors\":\"Esra Dilek, Basar Baysal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21647259.2021.2019467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Adopting a negotiation process analysis perspective, this article analyzes the peace negotiation processes in Colombia (2012–2016) and Turkey (2012–2015) with a focus on three aspects of the negotiation process: the timing of the negotiations, the actors in the negotiation process, and transparency. In the Colombian case, the formation of a clear negotiation framework at the start of official negotiations in August 2012 helped the process to stay on track until the signing of the General Agreement in 2016. Conversely, the negotiations in Turkey did not proceed based on a clear framework and stalled in 2015 amid domestic and regional developments because of a lack of clear representatives and of monitoring third parties to keep the process on track. As the Colombian case shows, the existence of a commonly agreed and clear negotiation framework may increase resilience that help mitigate the potential for domestic and external risks to derail the process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peacebuilding\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"449 - 469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peacebuilding\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2021.2019467\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peacebuilding","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2021.2019467","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文采用谈判过程分析的视角,分析了哥伦比亚(2012-2016)和土耳其(2012-2015)的和平谈判过程,重点分析了谈判过程的三个方面:谈判的时机、谈判过程中的行动者和透明度。在哥伦比亚的情况下,2012年8月正式谈判开始时形成了一个明确的谈判框架,这有助于该进程保持正轨,直到2016年签署总协定。相反,在土耳其的谈判并没有基于一个明确的框架进行,由于缺乏明确的代表和监督第三方来保持进程的轨道,2015年在国内和地区的发展中停滞不前。正如哥伦比亚的案例所表明的那样,一个普遍同意的、明确的谈判框架的存在可能会增强韧性,有助于减轻破坏这一进程的国内和外部风险的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peace negotiation process and outcome: considering Colombia and Turkey in comparative perspective
ABSTRACT Adopting a negotiation process analysis perspective, this article analyzes the peace negotiation processes in Colombia (2012–2016) and Turkey (2012–2015) with a focus on three aspects of the negotiation process: the timing of the negotiations, the actors in the negotiation process, and transparency. In the Colombian case, the formation of a clear negotiation framework at the start of official negotiations in August 2012 helped the process to stay on track until the signing of the General Agreement in 2016. Conversely, the negotiations in Turkey did not proceed based on a clear framework and stalled in 2015 amid domestic and regional developments because of a lack of clear representatives and of monitoring third parties to keep the process on track. As the Colombian case shows, the existence of a commonly agreed and clear negotiation framework may increase resilience that help mitigate the potential for domestic and external risks to derail the process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peacebuilding
Peacebuilding Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
The fragmentation of the security-development nexus: the UK government’s approach to security and development 2015-2022 Micro-level experiences, understandings and visions of peace in Sri Lanka’s war victory Feel the grass grow: ecologies of slow peace in Colombia Feel the grass grow: ecologies of slow peace in Colombia , by Angela Jill Lederach, Stanford, California, USA, Stanford University Press, 2023, 281 pp., 30 USD (paperback), ISBN 9781503635685 Urban restructuring and the reproduction of spaces of violence in Belfast Swimming against the tide: transfer from civil society consultations to track 1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1