{"title":"Archaeological Mission of Chieti University in Libya: Reports 2006–2008. Res I (Reports, Excavations and Studies of the Archaeological Unit of the University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti – Pescara) By Oliva Menozzi. Archaeopress, Oxford, n.d. ISBN 978-1-78969-446-8 and ISBN 978-1-78969-447-5 (ePdf).","authors":"A. Leone","doi":"10.1017/lis.2021.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"forms of colonial landscape created by the Mediterranean powers. The second section is concerned with ‘The Transformation of Peripheral Societies and Landscapes’. In the first article Lauren Ristvet provides a thoughtful interpretation of the violent landscape of the southern Caucasus in the iron age, framed in terms of almost fractal relationships with the military fringes of wider empires – principally Urartu and of Assyria. Anna Boozer (on Dakhla/Kharga and Lower Nubia) and Lidewijde de Jong and Rocco Palermo (on the north Mesopotamian steppe) examine the Roman imperial impact on some relatively neglected regions, and offer helpful overviews to the archaeology of each. The strongest article in this section is perhaps Joanita Vroom’s discussion of Butrint in the middle Byzantine period. This is an exemplary use of a relatively small site to examine the wider processes of imperialism – in this case the fluctuating Balkan frontier of the Byzantine empire from the ninth century. The final section contains just two articles: J. Daniel Rogers’s discussion of ‘repertoires of empire’, which takes as its starting point discussion of the steppe empires of Inner Asian pastoral groups – a helpful reminder that not all empires were founded by settled societies, or revolved around focal capitals. Finally Bradley J. Parker adopts a consciously comparative and broad-brush approach, using material from Incan imperialism in the Andes to illuminate his understanding of his own principal area of study in the Neo-Assyrian empire. The editors are to be commended for gathering together such a wide-ranging volume, and particularly for their introduction. This sets out the scope of this shared enquiry very well, and places all the contributions within a developing scholarly field. As a clear introduction to the changing archaeology of empire (and where the field might go from here), this is a welcome book indeed.","PeriodicalId":40059,"journal":{"name":"Libyan Studies","volume":"52 1","pages":"192 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libyan Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/lis.2021.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
地中海列强创造的殖民景观第二部分是关于“周边社会和景观的转变”。在第一篇文章中,Lauren Ristvet对铁器时代南高加索地区的暴力景观进行了深思熟虑的解释,并将其与更大帝国(主要是乌拉尔图和亚述)的军事边缘几乎分形的关系框架起来。Anna Boozer(研究Dakhla/Kharga和下努比亚)和Lidewijde de Jong和Rocco Palermo(研究北美索不达米亚草原)研究了罗马帝国对一些相对被忽视的地区的影响,并对每个地区的考古学提供了有益的概述。本节中最有力的文章可能是Joanita Vroom关于拜占庭中期Butrint的讨论。这是一个典型的使用相对较小的地点来检查帝国主义更广泛的过程-在这种情况下,拜占庭帝国从9世纪开始波动的巴尔干边界。最后一部分只包含两篇文章:j·丹尼尔·罗杰斯(J. Daniel Rogers)关于“帝国的风格”的讨论,以讨论中亚牧区的草原帝国为起点——这有助于提醒我们,并非所有帝国都是由定居社会建立的,或者围绕着中心首都。最后,Bradley J. Parker采用了一种有意识的比较和广泛的方法,使用安第斯山脉印加帝国主义的材料来阐明他对新亚述帝国的主要研究领域的理解。编辑们汇集了如此广泛的卷,特别是他们的介绍,是值得赞扬的。这很好地阐述了这种共同探究的范围,并将所有的贡献放在一个发展中的学术领域内。作为对不断变化的帝国考古学(以及该领域可能走向何方)的清晰介绍,这确实是一本受欢迎的书。
Archaeological Mission of Chieti University in Libya: Reports 2006–2008. Res I (Reports, Excavations and Studies of the Archaeological Unit of the University G. D'Annunzio of Chieti – Pescara) By Oliva Menozzi. Archaeopress, Oxford, n.d. ISBN 978-1-78969-446-8 and ISBN 978-1-78969-447-5 (ePdf).
forms of colonial landscape created by the Mediterranean powers. The second section is concerned with ‘The Transformation of Peripheral Societies and Landscapes’. In the first article Lauren Ristvet provides a thoughtful interpretation of the violent landscape of the southern Caucasus in the iron age, framed in terms of almost fractal relationships with the military fringes of wider empires – principally Urartu and of Assyria. Anna Boozer (on Dakhla/Kharga and Lower Nubia) and Lidewijde de Jong and Rocco Palermo (on the north Mesopotamian steppe) examine the Roman imperial impact on some relatively neglected regions, and offer helpful overviews to the archaeology of each. The strongest article in this section is perhaps Joanita Vroom’s discussion of Butrint in the middle Byzantine period. This is an exemplary use of a relatively small site to examine the wider processes of imperialism – in this case the fluctuating Balkan frontier of the Byzantine empire from the ninth century. The final section contains just two articles: J. Daniel Rogers’s discussion of ‘repertoires of empire’, which takes as its starting point discussion of the steppe empires of Inner Asian pastoral groups – a helpful reminder that not all empires were founded by settled societies, or revolved around focal capitals. Finally Bradley J. Parker adopts a consciously comparative and broad-brush approach, using material from Incan imperialism in the Andes to illuminate his understanding of his own principal area of study in the Neo-Assyrian empire. The editors are to be commended for gathering together such a wide-ranging volume, and particularly for their introduction. This sets out the scope of this shared enquiry very well, and places all the contributions within a developing scholarly field. As a clear introduction to the changing archaeology of empire (and where the field might go from here), this is a welcome book indeed.