作为宗教复兴的政治改革:Tanzimat的概念基础

Q1 Arts and Humanities Oriente Moderno Pub Date : 2021-12-27 DOI:10.1163/22138617-12340261
A. Topal
{"title":"作为宗教复兴的政治改革:Tanzimat的概念基础","authors":"A. Topal","doi":"10.1163/22138617-12340261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nParallel to Arab Nahḍah, Ottoman modernization program is associated with the Tanzimat, a period of drastic social, political and institutional transformation. The word tanẓīmāt itself, however, merely means “regulations” or “reorganization” and very little has been done in investigating the conceptual or ideational foundations of Tanzimat reforms. The question at stake here is how these series of reforms were justified and legitimized within the Ottoman political culture. Accordingly, this paper focuses on reform debates among Ottoman bureaucrats and statesmen in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries and proposes the concept and doctrine of taǧdīd (renewal) as a key to understanding Ottoman reform and religious transformation. Ottoman reformers at the turn of 19th century resorted to the doctrine of centennial renewal in order to both criticize the moral shortcomings of Ottoman political system and legitimize innovation. Within this logic, Ottoman reformist sultans and politicians have frequently been referred to as muǧaddids, that is restorers. This paper will present an account of the concept of taǧdīd based on Ottoman political and historical writing from the period. I argue that Ottoman reform was inseparable from the logic of religious revival and that Ottoman debates should be considered as part of and discussed in relation to the 18th-century Muslim revivalism which has attracted growing attention in the last decade.","PeriodicalId":35837,"journal":{"name":"Oriente Moderno","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Reforms as Religious Revival: Conceptual Foundations of Tanzimat\",\"authors\":\"A. Topal\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22138617-12340261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nParallel to Arab Nahḍah, Ottoman modernization program is associated with the Tanzimat, a period of drastic social, political and institutional transformation. The word tanẓīmāt itself, however, merely means “regulations” or “reorganization” and very little has been done in investigating the conceptual or ideational foundations of Tanzimat reforms. The question at stake here is how these series of reforms were justified and legitimized within the Ottoman political culture. Accordingly, this paper focuses on reform debates among Ottoman bureaucrats and statesmen in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries and proposes the concept and doctrine of taǧdīd (renewal) as a key to understanding Ottoman reform and religious transformation. Ottoman reformers at the turn of 19th century resorted to the doctrine of centennial renewal in order to both criticize the moral shortcomings of Ottoman political system and legitimize innovation. Within this logic, Ottoman reformist sultans and politicians have frequently been referred to as muǧaddids, that is restorers. This paper will present an account of the concept of taǧdīd based on Ottoman political and historical writing from the period. I argue that Ottoman reform was inseparable from the logic of religious revival and that Ottoman debates should be considered as part of and discussed in relation to the 18th-century Muslim revivalism which has attracted growing attention in the last decade.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oriente Moderno\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oriente Moderno\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22138617-12340261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oriente Moderno","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22138617-12340261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与阿拉伯Nah平行ḍ啊,奥斯曼的现代化计划和坦齐玛特有关,这是一个剧烈的社会、政治和制度变革时期。tan这个词ẓ然而,īmāt本身仅仅意味着“法规”或“重组”,在调查坦桑尼亚改革的概念或思想基础方面几乎没有做什么。这里的关键问题是,在奥斯曼政治文化中,这些一系列改革是如何被证明是正当的和合法的。因此,本文关注了18世纪末和19世纪初奥斯曼帝国官僚和政治家之间的改革辩论,并提出了更新的概念和学说,作为理解奥斯曼帝国改革和宗教变革的关键。19世纪之交,奥斯曼改革者诉诸百年复兴学说,既批判奥斯曼政治制度的道德缺陷,又使创新合法化。在这种逻辑中,奥斯曼改革派苏丹和政治家经常被称为穆阿迪兹,即恢复者。本文将以奥斯曼时期的政治和历史写作为基础,介绍taǧdīd的概念。我认为奥斯曼帝国的改革与宗教复兴的逻辑密不可分,奥斯曼帝国的辩论应该被视为18世纪穆斯林复兴主义的一部分,并与之相关,这在过去十年中引起了越来越多的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Political Reforms as Religious Revival: Conceptual Foundations of Tanzimat
Parallel to Arab Nahḍah, Ottoman modernization program is associated with the Tanzimat, a period of drastic social, political and institutional transformation. The word tanẓīmāt itself, however, merely means “regulations” or “reorganization” and very little has been done in investigating the conceptual or ideational foundations of Tanzimat reforms. The question at stake here is how these series of reforms were justified and legitimized within the Ottoman political culture. Accordingly, this paper focuses on reform debates among Ottoman bureaucrats and statesmen in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries and proposes the concept and doctrine of taǧdīd (renewal) as a key to understanding Ottoman reform and religious transformation. Ottoman reformers at the turn of 19th century resorted to the doctrine of centennial renewal in order to both criticize the moral shortcomings of Ottoman political system and legitimize innovation. Within this logic, Ottoman reformist sultans and politicians have frequently been referred to as muǧaddids, that is restorers. This paper will present an account of the concept of taǧdīd based on Ottoman political and historical writing from the period. I argue that Ottoman reform was inseparable from the logic of religious revival and that Ottoman debates should be considered as part of and discussed in relation to the 18th-century Muslim revivalism which has attracted growing attention in the last decade.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oriente Moderno
Oriente Moderno Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Prophets, Gods and Kings in Sīrat Sayf ibn Dhī Yazan. An Intertextual Reading of an Egyptian Popular Epic, written by Blatherwick, Helen Principles of Ritual Prayer: An 18th Century Catechism in Bahdini Kurdish Panj ganj. I cinque tesori di Neẓāmi Ganjavi della Fondazione Giorgio Cini, edited by Daniela Meneghini e Alessandro Martoni Alcune considerazioni intorno al dibattito storiografico sulla Siria contemporanea Visualizing Sufism. Studies on Graphic Representations in Sufi Literature (13th to 16th Century), edited by Giovanni Maria Martini
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1