“我的节育让我情绪紧张”:关于避孕的在线女性叙事

Karabo Sitto, E. Lubinga
{"title":"“我的节育让我情绪紧张”:关于避孕的在线女性叙事","authors":"Karabo Sitto, E. Lubinga","doi":"10.1080/02500167.2021.1987945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Digital communication tools have become increasingly pivotal to facilitating the engagement and management of difficult health-related conversations. Peer conversations about individual women's experiences relating to the side effects of contraceptive use are not often held outside of medical contexts. To provoke conversations about birth control, on 9 January 2018, the Sexual and Reproductive Justice Coalition (SRJC) tweeted the results of a study about the severe side effects of using Depo-Provera (a contraceptive injection), triggering diverse discussions. This article reports on a study that analysed online narratives of tweets based on female experiences of effects suffered from contraceptive use and adopted a qualitative netnography design. Three theoretical perspectives, namely, the spiral of silence theory, the critical modernism theory, and the patient-centred model of health care, were relevant to the study. The results provided oft-unheard narratives of South African female voices on personal experiences and agency about contraceptive use. Within health communication, policymakers, as well as campaign designers, need to have a holistic understanding of the factors which may influence women's decisions to (dis)continue a contraceptive method. Such information is critical to designing interventions and programmes which will enable the achievement of important birth control goals and inform the design of effective policies or health campaign messaging. Online patient empowerment on various social media platforms needs to be monitored to avoid misinformation.","PeriodicalId":44378,"journal":{"name":"Communicatio-South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research","volume":"47 1","pages":"96 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“My Birth Control Makes Me Emotionally Psycho”: Online Female Narratives about Contraceptives\",\"authors\":\"Karabo Sitto, E. Lubinga\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02500167.2021.1987945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Digital communication tools have become increasingly pivotal to facilitating the engagement and management of difficult health-related conversations. Peer conversations about individual women's experiences relating to the side effects of contraceptive use are not often held outside of medical contexts. To provoke conversations about birth control, on 9 January 2018, the Sexual and Reproductive Justice Coalition (SRJC) tweeted the results of a study about the severe side effects of using Depo-Provera (a contraceptive injection), triggering diverse discussions. This article reports on a study that analysed online narratives of tweets based on female experiences of effects suffered from contraceptive use and adopted a qualitative netnography design. Three theoretical perspectives, namely, the spiral of silence theory, the critical modernism theory, and the patient-centred model of health care, were relevant to the study. The results provided oft-unheard narratives of South African female voices on personal experiences and agency about contraceptive use. Within health communication, policymakers, as well as campaign designers, need to have a holistic understanding of the factors which may influence women's decisions to (dis)continue a contraceptive method. Such information is critical to designing interventions and programmes which will enable the achievement of important birth control goals and inform the design of effective policies or health campaign messaging. Online patient empowerment on various social media platforms needs to be monitored to avoid misinformation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communicatio-South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"96 - 121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communicatio-South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2021.1987945\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicatio-South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2021.1987945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

数字通信工具在促进参与和管理困难的健康相关对话方面变得越来越重要。关于使用避孕药具的副作用的妇女个人经历的同侪对话,通常不会在医学范围之外举行。为了引发关于节育的讨论,2018年1月9日,性与生殖正义联盟(SRJC)在推特上发布了一项关于使用Depo-Provera(一种避孕注射剂)严重副作用的研究结果,引发了各种讨论。本文报道了一项研究,该研究基于女性使用避孕药具所遭受的影响的经验,分析了推特的在线叙述,并采用了定性网络图设计。三个理论视角,即沉默的螺旋理论、批判现代主义理论和以病人为中心的医疗模式与研究相关。研究结果提供了南非女性关于避孕药具使用的个人经历和机构的经常闻所未闻的叙述。在卫生宣传方面,决策者和运动设计者需要全面了解可能影响妇女决定(不)继续使用一种避孕方法的因素。这些信息对于设计干预措施和方案至关重要,这些措施和方案将能够实现重要的生育控制目标,并为设计有效的政策或保健运动信息提供信息。需要监测各种社交媒体平台上的在线患者授权,以避免错误信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“My Birth Control Makes Me Emotionally Psycho”: Online Female Narratives about Contraceptives
Abstract Digital communication tools have become increasingly pivotal to facilitating the engagement and management of difficult health-related conversations. Peer conversations about individual women's experiences relating to the side effects of contraceptive use are not often held outside of medical contexts. To provoke conversations about birth control, on 9 January 2018, the Sexual and Reproductive Justice Coalition (SRJC) tweeted the results of a study about the severe side effects of using Depo-Provera (a contraceptive injection), triggering diverse discussions. This article reports on a study that analysed online narratives of tweets based on female experiences of effects suffered from contraceptive use and adopted a qualitative netnography design. Three theoretical perspectives, namely, the spiral of silence theory, the critical modernism theory, and the patient-centred model of health care, were relevant to the study. The results provided oft-unheard narratives of South African female voices on personal experiences and agency about contraceptive use. Within health communication, policymakers, as well as campaign designers, need to have a holistic understanding of the factors which may influence women's decisions to (dis)continue a contraceptive method. Such information is critical to designing interventions and programmes which will enable the achievement of important birth control goals and inform the design of effective policies or health campaign messaging. Online patient empowerment on various social media platforms needs to be monitored to avoid misinformation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
An Analytical Lens Resting on a Tripod: De-Westernising, Internationalising, and Decolonising International Communication TV and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study of the Television Platform Consumption Choices of Millennials in Gauteng during a Pandemic Internet Shutdown and Regime-Imposed Disinformation Campaigns Media Discourse, Legal, and Ethical Issues Arising from the Zuma Saga and Nkandlagate The Media Decolonial Theory: Re-theorising and Rupturing Euro-American Canons for South African Media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1