重新思考第一党时代:1796-1824年大西洋中部美国众议院选举

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE American Political Thought Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1086/722097
Jay K. Dow
{"title":"重新思考第一党时代:1796-1824年大西洋中部美国众议院选举","authors":"Jay K. Dow","doi":"10.1086/722097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political scientists have long accepted the “party eras” delineation of American political history. In this, the first party era (1789–1824) is characterized as a proto-democratic period lacking the party development and mass electoral engagement necessary to produce recognizably modern electoral democracy. This study uses newly available constituency-level House of Representatives election returns from the Middle Atlantic region to challenge this characterization. These data permit detailed study of voter turnout, the party vote and evidence of partisanship, geographic patterns of party support, and the effect of election rules on party ability to elect representatives. Interpreted in light of recent historical scholarship and received theories of party emergence, the returns show a more developed, party-centric, and competitive electoral politics than previously recognized.","PeriodicalId":41928,"journal":{"name":"American Political Thought","volume":"11 1","pages":"525 - 549"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking the First Party Era: Middle Atlantic US House Elections, 1796–1824\",\"authors\":\"Jay K. Dow\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/722097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Political scientists have long accepted the “party eras” delineation of American political history. In this, the first party era (1789–1824) is characterized as a proto-democratic period lacking the party development and mass electoral engagement necessary to produce recognizably modern electoral democracy. This study uses newly available constituency-level House of Representatives election returns from the Middle Atlantic region to challenge this characterization. These data permit detailed study of voter turnout, the party vote and evidence of partisanship, geographic patterns of party support, and the effect of election rules on party ability to elect representatives. Interpreted in light of recent historical scholarship and received theories of party emergence, the returns show a more developed, party-centric, and competitive electoral politics than previously recognized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Political Thought\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"525 - 549\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Political Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/722097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Political Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政治学家长期以来一直接受美国政治史上“政党时代”的描述。在这方面,第一政党时代(1789-1824)被描述为一个原始民主时期,缺乏产生可识别的现代选举民主所需的政党发展和大规模选举参与。这项研究使用了来自中大西洋地区的最新选区级别的众议院选举结果来挑战这种定性。这些数据允许对选民投票率、政党投票和党派偏见证据、政党支持的地理模式以及选举规则对政党选举代表能力的影响进行详细研究。根据最近的历史学术和公认的政党崛起理论进行解释,选举结果显示出比以前认识到的更加发达、以政党为中心和竞争激烈的选举政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rethinking the First Party Era: Middle Atlantic US House Elections, 1796–1824
Political scientists have long accepted the “party eras” delineation of American political history. In this, the first party era (1789–1824) is characterized as a proto-democratic period lacking the party development and mass electoral engagement necessary to produce recognizably modern electoral democracy. This study uses newly available constituency-level House of Representatives election returns from the Middle Atlantic region to challenge this characterization. These data permit detailed study of voter turnout, the party vote and evidence of partisanship, geographic patterns of party support, and the effect of election rules on party ability to elect representatives. Interpreted in light of recent historical scholarship and received theories of party emergence, the returns show a more developed, party-centric, and competitive electoral politics than previously recognized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Political Thought
American Political Thought POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
:The Individualists: Radicals, Reactionaries, and the Struggle for the Soul of Libertarianism :The Cambridge Companion to Montesquieu Conservative Progressivism? Michael Cunniff, Federalism, and the Founding of Arizona :America’s Philosopher: John Locke in American Political Life “Dishonorable to the American Character”: James Madison and the Impact of the Federal Convention’s Bargain on Slavery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1