贸易和投资条约的财政影响

Devika Dutt, K. Gallagher
{"title":"贸易和投资条约的财政影响","authors":"Devika Dutt, K. Gallagher","doi":"10.1080/08911916.2022.2145042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines the extent to which the latest wave of trade and investment treaties has impacted the fiscal stability of the world’s nations. We construct two new measures of trade liberalization based on the importance of a country in the global network of trade and investment treaties, namely the number of trade treaty links and the hub connectedness of a country. This analysis is important since many analyses of the welfare impacts of trade liberalization typically do not consider the impact on the fiscal balances of governments or assume that any loss of tariff revenue would be made up by the imposition of indirect taxes, like a Value Added Tax. Using a cross-country regression analysis, we confirm that trade liberalization has, on average, reduced the amount of tariff revenue collected. Furthermore, trade liberalization is not correlated with an automatic compensation for lost tariff revenue through other taxation measures. We find, in some cases, that trade and investment treaties are correlated with a reduction in total fiscal revenues and an increase in government debt. These results suggest that policymakers need to take the fiscal impacts of trade and investment liberalization into account when making decisions about trade and investment policy.","PeriodicalId":44784,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Fiscal Impacts of Trade and Investment Treaties\",\"authors\":\"Devika Dutt, K. Gallagher\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08911916.2022.2145042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article examines the extent to which the latest wave of trade and investment treaties has impacted the fiscal stability of the world’s nations. We construct two new measures of trade liberalization based on the importance of a country in the global network of trade and investment treaties, namely the number of trade treaty links and the hub connectedness of a country. This analysis is important since many analyses of the welfare impacts of trade liberalization typically do not consider the impact on the fiscal balances of governments or assume that any loss of tariff revenue would be made up by the imposition of indirect taxes, like a Value Added Tax. Using a cross-country regression analysis, we confirm that trade liberalization has, on average, reduced the amount of tariff revenue collected. Furthermore, trade liberalization is not correlated with an automatic compensation for lost tariff revenue through other taxation measures. We find, in some cases, that trade and investment treaties are correlated with a reduction in total fiscal revenues and an increase in government debt. These results suggest that policymakers need to take the fiscal impacts of trade and investment liberalization into account when making decisions about trade and investment policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2022.2145042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2022.2145042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了最新一波贸易和投资条约对世界各国财政稳定的影响程度。我们根据一国在全球贸易和投资条约网络中的重要性,构建了两种新的贸易自由化措施,即一国的贸易条约链接数量和枢纽连通性。这一分析很重要,因为许多关于贸易自由化对福利影响的分析通常没有考虑对政府财政平衡的影响,也没有假设关税收入的任何损失都可以通过征收间接税(如增值税)来弥补。通过跨国回归分析,我们证实贸易自由化平均减少了征收的关税收入。此外,贸易自由化与通过其他税收措施自动补偿关税收入损失并不相关。我们发现,在某些情况下,贸易和投资条约与财政总收入的减少和政府债务的增加相关。这些结果表明,政策制定者在制定贸易和投资政策时需要考虑贸易和投资自由化对财政的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Fiscal Impacts of Trade and Investment Treaties
Abstract This article examines the extent to which the latest wave of trade and investment treaties has impacted the fiscal stability of the world’s nations. We construct two new measures of trade liberalization based on the importance of a country in the global network of trade and investment treaties, namely the number of trade treaty links and the hub connectedness of a country. This analysis is important since many analyses of the welfare impacts of trade liberalization typically do not consider the impact on the fiscal balances of governments or assume that any loss of tariff revenue would be made up by the imposition of indirect taxes, like a Value Added Tax. Using a cross-country regression analysis, we confirm that trade liberalization has, on average, reduced the amount of tariff revenue collected. Furthermore, trade liberalization is not correlated with an automatic compensation for lost tariff revenue through other taxation measures. We find, in some cases, that trade and investment treaties are correlated with a reduction in total fiscal revenues and an increase in government debt. These results suggest that policymakers need to take the fiscal impacts of trade and investment liberalization into account when making decisions about trade and investment policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Alain Parguez and Monetary Circuit Theory: Keys to Understanding the Development of Economies with a Double Monetary Standard Tilting at Windmills: Bernanke and Blanchard’s Obsession with the Wage-Price Spiral Inflation in France Since the 1960s: A Post-Keynesian Interpretation Using the Conflict-Inflation Model An Assessment of Pandemic Era Inflation, 2021–2022 Elaborating on the Demand-Side of Economic Development: Schumpeter and Neo-Schumpeterian Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1