费迪南德·索绪尔。苏联。1950年…

IF 1 1区 文学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Sign Systems Studies Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.12697/sss.2022.50.1.09
E. Velmezova
{"title":"费迪南德·索绪尔。苏联。1950年…","authors":"E. Velmezova","doi":"10.12697/sss.2022.50.1.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the linguistic discussion organized in the Soviet newspaper Pravda in 1950, Ferdinand de Saussure was mentioned only a few times, but the corresponding references are important from the point of view of both the opinions about Saussure that were prevalent in Soviet linguistics before the discussion, and in light of its evolution afterwards. In 1950, both a supporter and an opponent of Marrist linguistics, Ivan Meschaninov and Arnold Chikobava respectively, unconditionally agreed on at least one thing: namely, that the theories of Saussure were, from their point(s) of view, unacceptable for “progressive” Soviet linguistics. This criticism of Saussure shows the significant shift made by Soviet humanities in the middle of the last century over the course of just a few years: in the late 1950s, it was the “revision” of the main theses of the criticism of Saussure that made possible the (relative) triumph of structuralism, which finally took place in the Soviet Union in the 1960s.","PeriodicalId":44467,"journal":{"name":"Sign Systems Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ferdinand de Saussure. USSR. 1950…\",\"authors\":\"E. Velmezova\",\"doi\":\"10.12697/sss.2022.50.1.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the linguistic discussion organized in the Soviet newspaper Pravda in 1950, Ferdinand de Saussure was mentioned only a few times, but the corresponding references are important from the point of view of both the opinions about Saussure that were prevalent in Soviet linguistics before the discussion, and in light of its evolution afterwards. In 1950, both a supporter and an opponent of Marrist linguistics, Ivan Meschaninov and Arnold Chikobava respectively, unconditionally agreed on at least one thing: namely, that the theories of Saussure were, from their point(s) of view, unacceptable for “progressive” Soviet linguistics. This criticism of Saussure shows the significant shift made by Soviet humanities in the middle of the last century over the course of just a few years: in the late 1950s, it was the “revision” of the main theses of the criticism of Saussure that made possible the (relative) triumph of structuralism, which finally took place in the Soviet Union in the 1960s.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sign Systems Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sign Systems Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2022.50.1.09\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sign Systems Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2022.50.1.09","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在1950年苏联报纸《真理报》组织的语言学讨论中,费迪南德·德·索绪尔只被提及了几次,但从讨论前苏联语言学中关于索绪尔的流行观点和讨论后索绪尔的演变来看,相应的参考文献是重要的。1950年,马克思主义语言学的支持者和反对者伊万·梅沙尼诺夫(Ivan Meschaninov)和阿诺德·奇科瓦瓦(Arnold Chikobava)分别无条件地同意至少一件事:即,从他们的观点来看,索索尔的理论对于“进步的”苏联语言学来说是不可接受的。这种对索绪尔的批判显示了苏联人文学科在上世纪中叶短短几年的时间里所发生的重大转变:在20世纪50年代末,正是对索绪尔批判的主要论点的“修正”,使得结构主义(相对)的胜利成为可能,这种胜利最终在20世纪60年代在苏联发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ferdinand de Saussure. USSR. 1950…
During the linguistic discussion organized in the Soviet newspaper Pravda in 1950, Ferdinand de Saussure was mentioned only a few times, but the corresponding references are important from the point of view of both the opinions about Saussure that were prevalent in Soviet linguistics before the discussion, and in light of its evolution afterwards. In 1950, both a supporter and an opponent of Marrist linguistics, Ivan Meschaninov and Arnold Chikobava respectively, unconditionally agreed on at least one thing: namely, that the theories of Saussure were, from their point(s) of view, unacceptable for “progressive” Soviet linguistics. This criticism of Saussure shows the significant shift made by Soviet humanities in the middle of the last century over the course of just a few years: in the late 1950s, it was the “revision” of the main theses of the criticism of Saussure that made possible the (relative) triumph of structuralism, which finally took place in the Soviet Union in the 1960s.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sign Systems Studies
Sign Systems Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Meaning-generating mechanisms and the semiosphere: Towards the semiotics of modern apocrypha Bulgarian culture and space in the religious context Considerations about the ‘right to a biography’: Saints and intellectuals in contemporary culture On binary opposition and binarism: A long-distance dialogue between decolonial critique and the Lotmanian semiotics Beneath Thy Protection: Portrait of the Holy Virgin as a semantic operator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1