牵线搭桥:青年尼采接受柏拉图专题讨论会的政治意义

Q4 Social Sciences Perspectives on Political Science Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10457097.2022.2154580
C. Brophy
{"title":"牵线搭桥:青年尼采接受柏拉图专题讨论会的政治意义","authors":"C. Brophy","doi":"10.1080/10457097.2022.2154580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Nietzsche’s 1864 student essay, “On the Relationship of the Speech of Alcibiades to the Rest of the Speeches in Plato’s Symposium” uses the image of a knot (Knoten) to capture the dynamic tension between the speculative orientation of Socrates and the practical orientation of Alcibiades, that is, between theory and life. This image of the “knot” as a dynamic tension between philosophical principles is a forerunner of the position Nietzsche will develop in his account of the “theoretical man” in The Birth of Tragedy (1872) and the 1874 “untimely meditation” on history and life. In this early essay, Nietzsche offers not merely an exposition of the Platonic dialogue, but a philosophical contribution of his own that clearly favors the orientation of Alcibiades. Developing the ideas of some recent commentators, I argue that Nietzsche’s image of the dynamic “knot” in his early interpretation of the Symposium is a key to the subtlety of his own philosophical position, which recognizes a real tension, rather than a mere opposition, between the orientation of Socrates to theory and of Alcibiades to life.","PeriodicalId":55874,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Political Science","volume":"52 1","pages":"29 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tying the Threads Together: The Political Significance of Young Nietzsche’s Reception of Plato’s Symposium\",\"authors\":\"C. Brophy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10457097.2022.2154580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Nietzsche’s 1864 student essay, “On the Relationship of the Speech of Alcibiades to the Rest of the Speeches in Plato’s Symposium” uses the image of a knot (Knoten) to capture the dynamic tension between the speculative orientation of Socrates and the practical orientation of Alcibiades, that is, between theory and life. This image of the “knot” as a dynamic tension between philosophical principles is a forerunner of the position Nietzsche will develop in his account of the “theoretical man” in The Birth of Tragedy (1872) and the 1874 “untimely meditation” on history and life. In this early essay, Nietzsche offers not merely an exposition of the Platonic dialogue, but a philosophical contribution of his own that clearly favors the orientation of Alcibiades. Developing the ideas of some recent commentators, I argue that Nietzsche’s image of the dynamic “knot” in his early interpretation of the Symposium is a key to the subtlety of his own philosophical position, which recognizes a real tension, rather than a mere opposition, between the orientation of Socrates to theory and of Alcibiades to life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Political Science\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"29 - 38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2022.2154580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2022.2154580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要尼采1864年的学生论文《论阿尔西比亚德斯的演讲与柏拉图专题讨论会上其他演讲的关系》用一个结(Knoten)的形象来捕捉苏格拉底的思辨取向与阿尔西比亚斯的实践取向之间的动态张力,即理论与生活之间的张力。这种“结”作为哲学原则之间的动态张力的形象,是尼采在《悲剧的诞生》(1872)和1874年对历史和生活的“不合时宜的沉思”中对“理论人”的描述中所发展的立场的先驱。在这篇早期的文章中,尼采不仅阐述了柏拉图式的对话,而且他自己的哲学贡献也明确支持阿尔西比亚德斯的方向。根据最近一些评论家的观点,我认为尼采在对研讨会的早期解释中对动态“结”的形象是他自己哲学立场微妙的关键,他认识到苏格拉底对理论的取向和阿尔西比亚德斯对生活的取向之间存在着真正的张力,而不仅仅是对立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tying the Threads Together: The Political Significance of Young Nietzsche’s Reception of Plato’s Symposium
Abstract Nietzsche’s 1864 student essay, “On the Relationship of the Speech of Alcibiades to the Rest of the Speeches in Plato’s Symposium” uses the image of a knot (Knoten) to capture the dynamic tension between the speculative orientation of Socrates and the practical orientation of Alcibiades, that is, between theory and life. This image of the “knot” as a dynamic tension between philosophical principles is a forerunner of the position Nietzsche will develop in his account of the “theoretical man” in The Birth of Tragedy (1872) and the 1874 “untimely meditation” on history and life. In this early essay, Nietzsche offers not merely an exposition of the Platonic dialogue, but a philosophical contribution of his own that clearly favors the orientation of Alcibiades. Developing the ideas of some recent commentators, I argue that Nietzsche’s image of the dynamic “knot” in his early interpretation of the Symposium is a key to the subtlety of his own philosophical position, which recognizes a real tension, rather than a mere opposition, between the orientation of Socrates to theory and of Alcibiades to life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives on Political Science
Perspectives on Political Science Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Whether discussing Montaigne"s case for tolerance or Nietzsche"s political critique of modern science, Perspectives on Political Science links contemporary politics and culture to the enduring questions posed by great thinkers from antiquity to the present. Ideas are the lifeblood of the journal, which comprises articles, symposia, and book reviews. Recent articles address the writings of Aristotle, Adam Smith, and Plutarch; the movies No Country for Old Men and 3:10 to Yuma; and the role of humility in modern political thought.
期刊最新文献
Paul & Empire Criticism: Why and How? Paul & Empire Criticism: Why and How? by Najeeb T. Haddad, Cascade Books, Publication Date: 2023 Conversation as Political Education Defending Socrates: Political Philosophy Before the Tribunal of Science Defending Socrates: Political Philosophy Before the Tribunal of Science , by Alex Priou, Macon, Georgia: Mercer University Press, 184 pp., ISBN 978-0-88146-914-1, Publication Date: 2023 The Politics of Suicide: Miasma and Katharmos in Plato’s Political Thought “Worse than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism,” by Erwin Chemerinsky
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1