全专业能力:对博士生的形成性评估。

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Training and Education in Professional Psychology Pub Date : 2023-05-18 DOI:10.1037/tep0000432
Lamia Yanouri, J. Callahan, S. Price, Randall J. Cox
{"title":"全专业能力:对博士生的形成性评估。","authors":"Lamia Yanouri, J. Callahan, S. Price, Randall J. Cox","doi":"10.1037/tep0000432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a paucity of information concerning normative reference ranges on standardized measures of profession-wide competencies for the purpose of conducting formative assessments. The present study draws from a convenience sample to provide developmental (first/second half of training year) normative data for use in formative assessments of individual trainees and program-level quality improvement processes. Data reveal the anticipated pattern of competency scores generally improving across any given training year, with the strongest gains in competencies tied to assessment, supervision, and advocacy. A secondary aim, which emerged after study launch, was to evaluate whether training disruptions due an infectious viral pandemic (COVID-19) exerted demonstrable impacts at the aggregate level on trainee competency development. This sample of doctoral trainees evidenced no pandemic-associated suppression of Competency attainment. Rather, this sample of trainees evidenced growth in focal competencies tied to policy creation, systems-change, management structure, and leadership. Training implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47035,"journal":{"name":"Training and Education in Professional Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profession-wide competencies: Formative assessments of doctoral trainees.\",\"authors\":\"Lamia Yanouri, J. Callahan, S. Price, Randall J. Cox\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tep0000432\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a paucity of information concerning normative reference ranges on standardized measures of profession-wide competencies for the purpose of conducting formative assessments. The present study draws from a convenience sample to provide developmental (first/second half of training year) normative data for use in formative assessments of individual trainees and program-level quality improvement processes. Data reveal the anticipated pattern of competency scores generally improving across any given training year, with the strongest gains in competencies tied to assessment, supervision, and advocacy. A secondary aim, which emerged after study launch, was to evaluate whether training disruptions due an infectious viral pandemic (COVID-19) exerted demonstrable impacts at the aggregate level on trainee competency development. This sample of doctoral trainees evidenced no pandemic-associated suppression of Competency attainment. Rather, this sample of trainees evidenced growth in focal competencies tied to policy creation, systems-change, management structure, and leadership. Training implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Training and Education in Professional Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Training and Education in Professional Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000432\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Training and Education in Professional Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000432","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了进行形成性评价,关于全专业能力的标准化措施的规范性参考范围的资料很缺乏。本研究从一个方便的样本中提取了发展(培训年的前/下半年)规范数据,用于对个别受训人员的形成性评估和方案级质量改进过程。数据显示,在任何给定的培训年度,能力得分的预期模式都在普遍提高,其中与评估、监督和倡导相关的能力收益最大。研究启动后出现的第二个目标是评估传染性病毒大流行(COVID-19)导致的培训中断是否在总体上对受训者的能力发展产生了明显的影响。该博士学员样本没有证明与大流行相关的能力获得抑制。相反,这些受训者的样本证明了与政策制定、制度变革、管理结构和领导力相关的核心能力的增长。讨论了培训所涉问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Profession-wide competencies: Formative assessments of doctoral trainees.
There is a paucity of information concerning normative reference ranges on standardized measures of profession-wide competencies for the purpose of conducting formative assessments. The present study draws from a convenience sample to provide developmental (first/second half of training year) normative data for use in formative assessments of individual trainees and program-level quality improvement processes. Data reveal the anticipated pattern of competency scores generally improving across any given training year, with the strongest gains in competencies tied to assessment, supervision, and advocacy. A secondary aim, which emerged after study launch, was to evaluate whether training disruptions due an infectious viral pandemic (COVID-19) exerted demonstrable impacts at the aggregate level on trainee competency development. This sample of doctoral trainees evidenced no pandemic-associated suppression of Competency attainment. Rather, this sample of trainees evidenced growth in focal competencies tied to policy creation, systems-change, management structure, and leadership. Training implications are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The Association of Postdoctoral and Internship Centers and the American Psychological Association have joined together to publish Training and Education in Professional Psychology, which serves as the primary source for gathering the most important information that contributes to and advances professional psychology education and training. The journal is written for psychologists and other mental health professionals who educate, supervise, and train mental health practitioners during their academic programs as well as during their participation at practicum, internship, and postdoctoral settings.
期刊最新文献
Utilizing a university and state collaboration to advance student training and support public mental health care. Supplemental Material for Cultivating Cultural Consciousness: Identity-Based Affinity Groups Among Clinical Trainees The development and current directions of a diversity specialty clinic: Implications for multicultural training in psychology. Clinical Psychology Graduate Programs: Falling Short in Cultural Humility Training. Ethical and diversity considerations of mandatory reporting: Implications for training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1