早期子宫颈腺癌卵巢转移的发生率和危险因素及保留卵巢的总生存率- meta分析

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of gynaecological oncology Pub Date : 2022-01-17 DOI:10.31083/j.ejgo4301006
Dong-jin Wu, Lihua Zhang, Nitish Beharee, Li Yang, Yinan Wu, Yingchun Wang, Mengmeng Lv, Jin Lu, Jinhua Wang
{"title":"早期子宫颈腺癌卵巢转移的发生率和危险因素及保留卵巢的总生存率- meta分析","authors":"Dong-jin Wu, Lihua Zhang, Nitish Beharee, Li Yang, Yinan Wu, Yingchun Wang, Mengmeng Lv, Jin Lu, Jinhua Wang","doi":"10.31083/j.ejgo4301006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the incidence of ovarian metastasis (OM) in early stage adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix, evaluate the overall survival with ovarian preservation and determine risk factors of OM for early stage AC. Data sources, methods of study selection: We searched the Cochranes database, Embase, and PubMed for publications to November 2020. The articles reporting the incidence, risk factors and overall survival of OM in AC were included. Articles that lacked sufficient data of the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were excluded. A fixed effects model was used to calculate OR and 95% CIs. Eggers test and Funnel plot were used to test the publication bias. Forest plots was used to present and synthesise results. Tabulation, integration and results: In the meta-analysis, the incidence of OM of AC was higher than that of SCC (OR 5.68, 95% CI 4.40–7.32, I = 28.1%) in stage IA-IIB. The incidence of OM was 0% in stage IA, 2.72% in stage IB, 5.95% in stage IIA, and 12.86% in stage IIB AC. Ovarian preservation was not significantly associated with OS (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35–0.80, I = 37.8%) in early stage of AC. We found seven risk factors for OM: deep stromal invasion (OR 8.80, 95% CI 3.20–24.23, I = 0%), corpus uteri invasion (OR 6.29, 95% CI 3.36–11.77, I = 21.8%), tumor size>4 cm (OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.86–7.69, I = 30.5%), FIGO stage IIA (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.98–6.81, I = 0%), FIGO stage IIB (OR 4.31, 95% CI 2.74–6.77, I = 0%), FIGO stage II (OR 3.99, 95% CI 2.49–6.41, I = 0%) and lympho-vascular space invasion (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.36–6.17, I = 0%). Conclusions: Ovarian preservation is only recommended in stage IA and stage IB AC without risk factors, but not reasonable for stage IIA and IIB AC. Both stage IIA and IIB are risk factors for OM in early stage AC.","PeriodicalId":11903,"journal":{"name":"European journal of gynaecological oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The incidence and risk factors for ovarian metastasis and overall survival with ovarian preservation for early-stage adenocarcinoma of the cervix-A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Dong-jin Wu, Lihua Zhang, Nitish Beharee, Li Yang, Yinan Wu, Yingchun Wang, Mengmeng Lv, Jin Lu, Jinhua Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.ejgo4301006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the incidence of ovarian metastasis (OM) in early stage adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix, evaluate the overall survival with ovarian preservation and determine risk factors of OM for early stage AC. Data sources, methods of study selection: We searched the Cochranes database, Embase, and PubMed for publications to November 2020. The articles reporting the incidence, risk factors and overall survival of OM in AC were included. Articles that lacked sufficient data of the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were excluded. A fixed effects model was used to calculate OR and 95% CIs. Eggers test and Funnel plot were used to test the publication bias. Forest plots was used to present and synthesise results. Tabulation, integration and results: In the meta-analysis, the incidence of OM of AC was higher than that of SCC (OR 5.68, 95% CI 4.40–7.32, I = 28.1%) in stage IA-IIB. The incidence of OM was 0% in stage IA, 2.72% in stage IB, 5.95% in stage IIA, and 12.86% in stage IIB AC. Ovarian preservation was not significantly associated with OS (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35–0.80, I = 37.8%) in early stage of AC. We found seven risk factors for OM: deep stromal invasion (OR 8.80, 95% CI 3.20–24.23, I = 0%), corpus uteri invasion (OR 6.29, 95% CI 3.36–11.77, I = 21.8%), tumor size>4 cm (OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.86–7.69, I = 30.5%), FIGO stage IIA (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.98–6.81, I = 0%), FIGO stage IIB (OR 4.31, 95% CI 2.74–6.77, I = 0%), FIGO stage II (OR 3.99, 95% CI 2.49–6.41, I = 0%) and lympho-vascular space invasion (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.36–6.17, I = 0%). Conclusions: Ovarian preservation is only recommended in stage IA and stage IB AC without risk factors, but not reasonable for stage IIA and IIB AC. Both stage IIA and IIB are risk factors for OM in early stage AC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of gynaecological oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of gynaecological oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ejgo4301006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of gynaecological oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ejgo4301006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较早期宫颈腺癌(AC)和鳞状细胞癌(SCC)卵巢转移(OM)的发生率,评估保留卵巢的总生存率,确定早期AC卵巢转移的危险因素。数据来源、研究选择方法:我们检索Cochranes数据库、Embase和PubMed,检索截至2020年11月的出版物。纳入了报道AC中OM的发病率、危险因素和总生存率的文章。排除了缺乏足够的比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(ci)数据的文章。采用固定效应模型计算OR和95% ci。采用Eggers检验和Funnel图检验发表偏倚。森林样地用于呈现和综合结果。表列、整合和结果:在meta分析中,在IA-IIB期,AC的OM发生率高于SCC (OR 5.68, 95% CI 4.40-7.32, I = 28.1%)。卵巢癌在IA期的发生率为0%,IB期为2.72%,IIA期为5.95%,IIB期为12.86%。在AC早期,卵巢保留与OS无显著相关性(OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35-0.80, I = 37.8%)。我们发现卵巢癌的7个危险因素:深间质浸润(OR 8.80, 95% CI 3.20-24.23, I = 0%)、子宫浸润(OR 6.29, 95% CI 3.36-11.77, I = 21.8%)、肿瘤大小bbbb4 cm (OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.86-7.69, I = 30.5%)、FIGO分期IIA (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.98-6.81, I = 0%)、FIGO分期IIB (OR 4.31, 95% CI 2.74-6.77, I = 0%)、FIGO分期II (OR 3.99, 95% CI 2.49-6.41, I = 0%)和淋巴血管间隙浸润(OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.36-6.17, I = 0%)。结论:卵巢保留仅在无危险因素的IA期和IB期AC中推荐,而在IIA期和IIB期AC中不合理。IIA期和IIB期都是早期AC发生OM的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The incidence and risk factors for ovarian metastasis and overall survival with ovarian preservation for early-stage adenocarcinoma of the cervix-A meta-analysis
Objective: To compare the incidence of ovarian metastasis (OM) in early stage adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix, evaluate the overall survival with ovarian preservation and determine risk factors of OM for early stage AC. Data sources, methods of study selection: We searched the Cochranes database, Embase, and PubMed for publications to November 2020. The articles reporting the incidence, risk factors and overall survival of OM in AC were included. Articles that lacked sufficient data of the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were excluded. A fixed effects model was used to calculate OR and 95% CIs. Eggers test and Funnel plot were used to test the publication bias. Forest plots was used to present and synthesise results. Tabulation, integration and results: In the meta-analysis, the incidence of OM of AC was higher than that of SCC (OR 5.68, 95% CI 4.40–7.32, I = 28.1%) in stage IA-IIB. The incidence of OM was 0% in stage IA, 2.72% in stage IB, 5.95% in stage IIA, and 12.86% in stage IIB AC. Ovarian preservation was not significantly associated with OS (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35–0.80, I = 37.8%) in early stage of AC. We found seven risk factors for OM: deep stromal invasion (OR 8.80, 95% CI 3.20–24.23, I = 0%), corpus uteri invasion (OR 6.29, 95% CI 3.36–11.77, I = 21.8%), tumor size>4 cm (OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.86–7.69, I = 30.5%), FIGO stage IIA (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.98–6.81, I = 0%), FIGO stage IIB (OR 4.31, 95% CI 2.74–6.77, I = 0%), FIGO stage II (OR 3.99, 95% CI 2.49–6.41, I = 0%) and lympho-vascular space invasion (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.36–6.17, I = 0%). Conclusions: Ovarian preservation is only recommended in stage IA and stage IB AC without risk factors, but not reasonable for stage IIA and IIB AC. Both stage IIA and IIB are risk factors for OM in early stage AC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJGO is dedicated to publishing editorial articles in the Distinguished Expert Series and original research papers, case reports, letters to the Editor, book reviews, and newsletters. The Journal was founded in 1980 the second gynaecologic oncology hyperspecialization Journal in the world. Its aim is the diffusion of scientific, clinical and practical progress, and knowledge in female neoplastic diseases in an interdisciplinary approach among gynaecologists, oncologists, radiotherapists, surgeons, chemotherapists, pathologists, epidemiologists, and so on.
期刊最新文献
Timing and duration of bevacizumab treatment and survival in patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer: a multi-institution study. Vulvar cancer in young woman—case report Identification of an immune-related metabolic gene signature to predict possible prognosis in endometrial cancer and reveals immune landscape feature Evaluation of colposcopy and LEEP results performed in gynecology and gynecological oncology surgery services The infrequent large pelvi-perineal tumors as a surgical dilemma: en bloc resection and long-term results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1