社会平衡:对目前实践的模型的分析以及作为企业可持续发展指数一部分的公司标准化的证据

IF 0.2 Q4 MANAGEMENT Revista ENIAC Pesquisa Pub Date : 2018-01-28 DOI:10.22567/REP.V7I1.497
Letícia Garrido de Aguiar, Taíse Oliveira
{"title":"社会平衡:对目前实践的模型的分析以及作为企业可持续发展指数一部分的公司标准化的证据","authors":"Letícia Garrido de Aguiar, Taíse Oliveira","doi":"10.22567/REP.V7I1.497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to analyze the Social Reports published by companies in the Ibase model wich are part of the Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE), to verify if those companies have published similar, relevant information and if there was a pattern. The methodology used in this study was the quantitative method and the techniques used were the not probabilistic sample and tabulation. The sample is composed by 14 companies that published, in 2014, the Social Balance in the national Ibase model. All information of all Social Reports were analyzed. The cut score of 64% was stablished based on absolute values, and the value is significant, once the next percentage is 29%. And how is not an half term between these values, the relevant information and would be in a possible pattern would be the information published by 64% or more of the companies. Similar and relevant information between companies, and, therefore, could show a possible pattern.","PeriodicalId":40421,"journal":{"name":"Revista ENIAC Pesquisa","volume":"7 1","pages":"109-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balanço social: análise dos modelos praticados atualmente e indícios de padronização em empresas que fazem parte do índice de sustentabilidade empresarial\",\"authors\":\"Letícia Garrido de Aguiar, Taíse Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.22567/REP.V7I1.497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study is to analyze the Social Reports published by companies in the Ibase model wich are part of the Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE), to verify if those companies have published similar, relevant information and if there was a pattern. The methodology used in this study was the quantitative method and the techniques used were the not probabilistic sample and tabulation. The sample is composed by 14 companies that published, in 2014, the Social Balance in the national Ibase model. All information of all Social Reports were analyzed. The cut score of 64% was stablished based on absolute values, and the value is significant, once the next percentage is 29%. And how is not an half term between these values, the relevant information and would be in a possible pattern would be the information published by 64% or more of the companies. Similar and relevant information between companies, and, therefore, could show a possible pattern.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista ENIAC Pesquisa\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"109-124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista ENIAC Pesquisa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22567/REP.V7I1.497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista ENIAC Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22567/REP.V7I1.497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的目的是分析公司在Ibase模型中发布的社会报告,这些报告是企业可持续发展指数(ISE)的一部分,以验证这些公司是否发布了类似的相关信息,以及是否存在模式。本研究中使用的方法是定量方法,使用的技术不是概率样本和表格。样本由14家公司组成,这些公司在2014年发布了国家Ibase模型中的社会平衡。对所有社会报告的所有信息进行了分析。64%的切割分数是根据绝对值确定的,一旦下一个百分比为29%,该值就很显著。在这些价值观、相关信息和可能的模式中,64%或更多的公司发布的信息之间没有半个术语。公司之间的类似和相关信息,因此,可能显示出一种可能的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Balanço social: análise dos modelos praticados atualmente e indícios de padronização em empresas que fazem parte do índice de sustentabilidade empresarial
The objective of this study is to analyze the Social Reports published by companies in the Ibase model wich are part of the Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE), to verify if those companies have published similar, relevant information and if there was a pattern. The methodology used in this study was the quantitative method and the techniques used were the not probabilistic sample and tabulation. The sample is composed by 14 companies that published, in 2014, the Social Balance in the national Ibase model. All information of all Social Reports were analyzed. The cut score of 64% was stablished based on absolute values, and the value is significant, once the next percentage is 29%. And how is not an half term between these values, the relevant information and would be in a possible pattern would be the information published by 64% or more of the companies. Similar and relevant information between companies, and, therefore, could show a possible pattern.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Dimensões da Competência em Tecnologia da Informação em Empresas Tecnológicas Brasileiras Deficiencias contables en las microempresas en Colombia: Un estudio de caso Políticas educacionais e a adaptação de estudantes indígenas ao Ensino Remoto de Emergência: Análise do perfil dos contribuintes e as variáveis intervenientes da declaração de imposto de renda pessoa física do Vale do Taquari - RS diversos métodos de avaliação de empresa e o fluxo de caixa descontado nos casos de apuração de haveres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1