我们只使用了10%的大脑和其他神经神话——一项对波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那教师的调查

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY Acta Neuropsychologica Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0015.9833
Armin Ramic, Irma Cehic, Sanela Rustempasic, D. Malec, H. Memišević
{"title":"我们只使用了10%的大脑和其他神经神话——一项对波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那教师的调查","authors":"Armin Ramic, Irma Cehic, Sanela Rustempasic, D. Malec, H. Memišević","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.9833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neuromyths are prevalent in all spheres of life and can be found in all professions. The teaching profession is especially susceptible to neuromyths as teachers want to provide the most effective, science-based instruction to their students. Sometimes these instructions are not based on scientific studies but on a misinterpretation of scientific findings or neuromyths. The goal of the present paper was to examine the prevalence of seven popular neuromyths in teachers in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BIH).\n\nThe sample for this study comprised 300 teachers from all parts of BIH. The research material comprised 300 teachers (232 females and 62 males) from all parts of BIH. Participants were either personally invited to the study or recruited through an online survey sent to schools throughout BIH and teacher organizations. As a method we used the Questionnaire consisting of basic demographic information on the participants (gender, working experience, type of teacher) and 7 neuromyths statements on which participants were asked to answer whether they think the statement is true, not true, or they do not know.\n\nThe results of this study indicate a wide prevalence of neuromyths in BIH teachers. The prevalence ranged from 17% to 82%. The most prevalent myth is about learning styles, while the least prevalent was that drinking less than 8 glasses of water causes a brain to shrink. There were statistically significant differences in the prevalence of neuromyths in relation to the teachers’ gender for every statement. However, the trend is not uniform. Although, overall the neuromyths were more prevalent in female teachers (for 5 items), for two neuromyth statements, male teachers had a higher prevalence. Additionally, the prevalence of neuromyths was more frequent in early-grade teachers. It should be noted that there are also differences in the results obtained for the different types of neuromyths.\n\nNeuroscience is important for education and for the teachers. Thus, more attention should be given to the process of translating neuroscientific findings into useful facts for teachers. One way to improve this process is through the continual professional development of teachers in the field of neuroscience.\n\n","PeriodicalId":43280,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WE ONLY USE 10% OF OUR BRAINS AND OTHER NEUROMYTHS – A SURVEY OF TEACHERS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA\",\"authors\":\"Armin Ramic, Irma Cehic, Sanela Rustempasic, D. Malec, H. Memišević\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0015.9833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neuromyths are prevalent in all spheres of life and can be found in all professions. The teaching profession is especially susceptible to neuromyths as teachers want to provide the most effective, science-based instruction to their students. Sometimes these instructions are not based on scientific studies but on a misinterpretation of scientific findings or neuromyths. The goal of the present paper was to examine the prevalence of seven popular neuromyths in teachers in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BIH).\\n\\nThe sample for this study comprised 300 teachers from all parts of BIH. The research material comprised 300 teachers (232 females and 62 males) from all parts of BIH. Participants were either personally invited to the study or recruited through an online survey sent to schools throughout BIH and teacher organizations. As a method we used the Questionnaire consisting of basic demographic information on the participants (gender, working experience, type of teacher) and 7 neuromyths statements on which participants were asked to answer whether they think the statement is true, not true, or they do not know.\\n\\nThe results of this study indicate a wide prevalence of neuromyths in BIH teachers. The prevalence ranged from 17% to 82%. The most prevalent myth is about learning styles, while the least prevalent was that drinking less than 8 glasses of water causes a brain to shrink. There were statistically significant differences in the prevalence of neuromyths in relation to the teachers’ gender for every statement. However, the trend is not uniform. Although, overall the neuromyths were more prevalent in female teachers (for 5 items), for two neuromyth statements, male teachers had a higher prevalence. Additionally, the prevalence of neuromyths was more frequent in early-grade teachers. It should be noted that there are also differences in the results obtained for the different types of neuromyths.\\n\\nNeuroscience is important for education and for the teachers. Thus, more attention should be given to the process of translating neuroscientific findings into useful facts for teachers. One way to improve this process is through the continual professional development of teachers in the field of neuroscience.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neuropsychologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neuropsychologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经神话在生活的各个领域都很普遍,在所有职业中都可以找到。教师职业尤其容易受到神经体操的影响,因为教师希望为学生提供最有效、基于科学的教学。有时,这些说明不是基于科学研究,而是基于对科学发现或神经体操的误解。本文的目的是调查波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那(波黑)教师中七种常见神经体操的患病率。本研究的样本包括来自波黑各地的300名教师。研究材料包括来自波黑各地区的300名教师(232名女性和62名男性)。参与者要么被亲自邀请参加研究,要么通过发送到波黑各学校和教师组织的在线调查进行招募。作为一种方法,我们使用了问卷,该问卷由参与者的基本人口统计信息(性别、工作经验、教师类型)和7项神经体操陈述组成,参与者被要求回答他们认为该陈述是真的、不是真的或他们不知道。这项研究的结果表明,波黑教师中神经体操的普遍性。患病率在17%到82%之间。最普遍的神话是关于学习风格的,而最不普遍的神话则是喝水少于8杯会导致大脑萎缩。在每一项陈述中,神经体操的患病率与教师的性别之间存在统计学上的显著差异。然而,趋势并不一致。尽管总体而言,神经体操在女教师中更为普遍(5项),但就两项神经体操陈述而言,男教师的患病率更高。此外,神经体操的患病率在低年级教师中更为常见。应该注意的是,不同类型的神经体操的结果也存在差异。神经科学对教育和教师都很重要。因此,应该更多地关注将神经科学发现转化为对教师有用的事实的过程。改善这一过程的一种方法是通过神经科学领域教师的持续专业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
WE ONLY USE 10% OF OUR BRAINS AND OTHER NEUROMYTHS – A SURVEY OF TEACHERS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Neuromyths are prevalent in all spheres of life and can be found in all professions. The teaching profession is especially susceptible to neuromyths as teachers want to provide the most effective, science-based instruction to their students. Sometimes these instructions are not based on scientific studies but on a misinterpretation of scientific findings or neuromyths. The goal of the present paper was to examine the prevalence of seven popular neuromyths in teachers in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BIH). The sample for this study comprised 300 teachers from all parts of BIH. The research material comprised 300 teachers (232 females and 62 males) from all parts of BIH. Participants were either personally invited to the study or recruited through an online survey sent to schools throughout BIH and teacher organizations. As a method we used the Questionnaire consisting of basic demographic information on the participants (gender, working experience, type of teacher) and 7 neuromyths statements on which participants were asked to answer whether they think the statement is true, not true, or they do not know. The results of this study indicate a wide prevalence of neuromyths in BIH teachers. The prevalence ranged from 17% to 82%. The most prevalent myth is about learning styles, while the least prevalent was that drinking less than 8 glasses of water causes a brain to shrink. There were statistically significant differences in the prevalence of neuromyths in relation to the teachers’ gender for every statement. However, the trend is not uniform. Although, overall the neuromyths were more prevalent in female teachers (for 5 items), for two neuromyth statements, male teachers had a higher prevalence. Additionally, the prevalence of neuromyths was more frequent in early-grade teachers. It should be noted that there are also differences in the results obtained for the different types of neuromyths. Neuroscience is important for education and for the teachers. Thus, more attention should be given to the process of translating neuroscientific findings into useful facts for teachers. One way to improve this process is through the continual professional development of teachers in the field of neuroscience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
42.90%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM OF REHABILITATION OFFERED ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT THERAPEUTIC PROTOCOLS IN REDUCING CHRONIC FRONTAL SYNDROME IN PATIENTS 10-YEARS FOLLOWING NEUROSURGERY FOR POST-TRAUMATIC INTRACEREBRAL HEMATOMA Empathy as a determinant of perceived stress and styles of coping with stress in medical, law and psychology students NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF COVID-19: CURRENT APPROACH AND CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FACTORS ASSOCIATED TO BURN-OUT AMONG IBN SINA HOSPITAL PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis in terms of psychosomatic effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1