内在的神经活动使人容易产生身体错觉

Tzu‐Yu Hsu, Jifan Zhou, G. Northoff, Su-Ling Yeh, T. Lane
{"title":"内在的神经活动使人容易产生身体错觉","authors":"Tzu‐Yu Hsu, Jifan Zhou, G. Northoff, Su-Ling Yeh, T. Lane","doi":"10.1093/texcom/tgac012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Susceptibility to the rubber hand illusion (RHI) varies. Thus far, however, there is no consensus as regards how to explain this variation. Previous studies, focused on the role of multisensory integration, have searched for neural correlates of the illusion. Those studies, however, have failed to identify a sufficient set of functionally specific neural correlates. An alternative explanation of the illusion is that it results from demand characteristics, chiefly variability in the disposition to respond to imaginative suggestion: the degree to which intrinsic neural activity allows for a blurring of boundaries between self and external objects. Some evidence suggests that frontal α power is one means of tracking neural instantiations of self; therefore, we hypothesized that the higher the frontal α power during eyes-closed resting state, the more stable the self. As a corollary, we infer that the more stable the self, the less susceptible are participants to a blurring of boundaries—to feeling that the rubber hand belongs to them. Indeed, we found that frontal α amplitude oscillations negatively correlate with susceptibility. Moreover, since α and δ oscillations seem to be associated in pathological states that allow for a blurring of boundaries between self and external objects, we conjectured that the high frontal α power observed in low-RHI participants is modulated by δ frequency oscillations. Indeed, we found this to be the case. Based on our findings we propose that the two explanatory frameworks might be complementary: that is, the neural correlates of multisensory integration might be necessary for the RHI, but a sufficient explanation requires investigation of variable intrinsic neural activity that acts to modulate how the brain responds to incompatible sensory stimuli. Highlights ~Intrinsic frontal α power negatively correlates with susceptibility to the RHI. ~Intrinsic α power modulated by δ oscillations varies with susceptibility to the RHI. ~Sufficient explanation of RHI requires understanding of intrinsic neural dispositions that regulate the boundary between self and the external world.","PeriodicalId":72551,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral cortex communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intrinsic neural activity predisposes susceptibility to a body illusion\",\"authors\":\"Tzu‐Yu Hsu, Jifan Zhou, G. Northoff, Su-Ling Yeh, T. Lane\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/texcom/tgac012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Susceptibility to the rubber hand illusion (RHI) varies. Thus far, however, there is no consensus as regards how to explain this variation. Previous studies, focused on the role of multisensory integration, have searched for neural correlates of the illusion. Those studies, however, have failed to identify a sufficient set of functionally specific neural correlates. An alternative explanation of the illusion is that it results from demand characteristics, chiefly variability in the disposition to respond to imaginative suggestion: the degree to which intrinsic neural activity allows for a blurring of boundaries between self and external objects. Some evidence suggests that frontal α power is one means of tracking neural instantiations of self; therefore, we hypothesized that the higher the frontal α power during eyes-closed resting state, the more stable the self. As a corollary, we infer that the more stable the self, the less susceptible are participants to a blurring of boundaries—to feeling that the rubber hand belongs to them. Indeed, we found that frontal α amplitude oscillations negatively correlate with susceptibility. Moreover, since α and δ oscillations seem to be associated in pathological states that allow for a blurring of boundaries between self and external objects, we conjectured that the high frontal α power observed in low-RHI participants is modulated by δ frequency oscillations. Indeed, we found this to be the case. Based on our findings we propose that the two explanatory frameworks might be complementary: that is, the neural correlates of multisensory integration might be necessary for the RHI, but a sufficient explanation requires investigation of variable intrinsic neural activity that acts to modulate how the brain responds to incompatible sensory stimuli. Highlights ~Intrinsic frontal α power negatively correlates with susceptibility to the RHI. ~Intrinsic α power modulated by δ oscillations varies with susceptibility to the RHI. ~Sufficient explanation of RHI requires understanding of intrinsic neural dispositions that regulate the boundary between self and the external world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cerebral cortex communications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cerebral cortex communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgac012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral cortex communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgac012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

对橡胶手错觉(RHI)的易感性各不相同。然而,到目前为止,对于如何解释这种变化还没有达成共识。先前的研究集中在多感官整合的作用上,已经在寻找幻觉的神经相关性。然而,这些研究未能确定一组足够的功能特异性神经相关性。对错觉的另一种解释是,它是由需求特征引起的,主要是对想象力建议做出反应的倾向的可变性:内在神经活动允许模糊自我和外部物体之间的界限的程度。一些证据表明,额叶α功率是追踪自我神经实例化的一种手段;因此,我们假设在闭眼休息状态下,额叶α功率越高,自我就越稳定。因此,我们推断,自我越稳定,参与者就越不容易受到界限模糊的影响——感觉橡皮手属于他们。事实上,我们发现额叶α振幅振荡与易感性呈负相关。此外,由于α和δ振荡似乎与自身和外部物体之间的边界模糊的病理状态有关,我们推测在低RHI参与者中观察到的高额α功率是由δ频率振荡调制的。事实上,我们发现情况确实如此。基于我们的发现,我们提出这两个解释框架可能是互补的:也就是说,多感觉整合的神经相关性可能对RHI是必要的,但充分的解释需要研究可变的内在神经活动,这些活动调节大脑对不相容的感觉刺激的反应。亮点~固有额α功率与RHI易感性呈负相关~由δ振荡调制的固有α功率随RHI的敏感性而变化~对RHI的充分解释需要理解调节自我和外部世界边界的内在神经倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intrinsic neural activity predisposes susceptibility to a body illusion
Susceptibility to the rubber hand illusion (RHI) varies. Thus far, however, there is no consensus as regards how to explain this variation. Previous studies, focused on the role of multisensory integration, have searched for neural correlates of the illusion. Those studies, however, have failed to identify a sufficient set of functionally specific neural correlates. An alternative explanation of the illusion is that it results from demand characteristics, chiefly variability in the disposition to respond to imaginative suggestion: the degree to which intrinsic neural activity allows for a blurring of boundaries between self and external objects. Some evidence suggests that frontal α power is one means of tracking neural instantiations of self; therefore, we hypothesized that the higher the frontal α power during eyes-closed resting state, the more stable the self. As a corollary, we infer that the more stable the self, the less susceptible are participants to a blurring of boundaries—to feeling that the rubber hand belongs to them. Indeed, we found that frontal α amplitude oscillations negatively correlate with susceptibility. Moreover, since α and δ oscillations seem to be associated in pathological states that allow for a blurring of boundaries between self and external objects, we conjectured that the high frontal α power observed in low-RHI participants is modulated by δ frequency oscillations. Indeed, we found this to be the case. Based on our findings we propose that the two explanatory frameworks might be complementary: that is, the neural correlates of multisensory integration might be necessary for the RHI, but a sufficient explanation requires investigation of variable intrinsic neural activity that acts to modulate how the brain responds to incompatible sensory stimuli. Highlights ~Intrinsic frontal α power negatively correlates with susceptibility to the RHI. ~Intrinsic α power modulated by δ oscillations varies with susceptibility to the RHI. ~Sufficient explanation of RHI requires understanding of intrinsic neural dispositions that regulate the boundary between self and the external world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
On the coupling and decoupling of mind wandering and perception: a shared metabolism account. Striatal correlates of Bayesian beliefs in self-efficacy in adolescents and their relation to mood and autonomy: a pilot study Frontal mechanisms underlying primate calls recognition by humans Detection and characterization of resting state functional networks in squirrel monkey brain. Methamphetamine enhances neural activation during anticipation of loss in the monetary incentive delay task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1