强化敏感性、人格结构和注意控制是限制性进食障碍的重要预测因素吗?

Andrew R. du Rocher, Jessica Barker, Monika I. Chalupka, Anna France, Raisa S. Habib, Joel H. Holzer, B. M. Johnston, Heather Mee, Imaan Mohammed, Rebecca Quail
{"title":"强化敏感性、人格结构和注意控制是限制性进食障碍的重要预测因素吗?","authors":"Andrew R. du Rocher, Jessica Barker, Monika I. Chalupka, Anna France, Raisa S. Habib, Joel H. Holzer, B. M. Johnston, Heather Mee, Imaan Mohammed, Rebecca Quail","doi":"10.21827/ijpp.7.37818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (rRST) perspective on personality suggests that a neuropsychological behavioural inhibition system (BIS), behavioural approach system (BAS), and a fight-flight-freeze system (FFFS) produce the key personality traits involved in approach and avoidance behaviours. This perspective on personality can be used as a framework for understanding psychopathology. Self-report research on rRST suggests that restrictive disordered eating relates to elevated BIS sensitivity, elevated FFFS sensitivity, and possibly dysfunctional BAS sensitivity. Disordered eating can also relate to reduced trait mindfulness, which is a broadly defined construct. Trait mindfulness is positively correlated with attentional control (AC) which is a more specific component of our cognitive architecture that incorporates attentional focusing and attentional shifting processes. It is unknown how BIS and AC interact to predict restrictive disordered eating. We tested how self-reported BIS, BAS, and FFFS sensitivity, AC, and trait mindfulness relate to restrictive disordered eating in 464 healthy participants, and 177 participants with a history of psychiatric disorder. We provide new evidence that elevated restrictive disordered eating relates to reduced self-reported AC abilities (in addition to elevated BIS, and elevated FFFS sensitivity). We illustrate that the combination of high BIS and low AC predicts high levels of restrictive disordered eating (but not in all participants), whereas low BIS and high AC predicts lower levels of restrictive disordered eating (but not in all participants). We discuss how understanding the relationship between personality and attentional control can inform the design of future intervention studies.  ","PeriodicalId":91096,"journal":{"name":"International journal of personality psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are reinforcement sensitivity personality constructs and attentional control important predictors of restrictive disordered eating?\",\"authors\":\"Andrew R. du Rocher, Jessica Barker, Monika I. Chalupka, Anna France, Raisa S. Habib, Joel H. Holzer, B. M. Johnston, Heather Mee, Imaan Mohammed, Rebecca Quail\",\"doi\":\"10.21827/ijpp.7.37818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (rRST) perspective on personality suggests that a neuropsychological behavioural inhibition system (BIS), behavioural approach system (BAS), and a fight-flight-freeze system (FFFS) produce the key personality traits involved in approach and avoidance behaviours. This perspective on personality can be used as a framework for understanding psychopathology. Self-report research on rRST suggests that restrictive disordered eating relates to elevated BIS sensitivity, elevated FFFS sensitivity, and possibly dysfunctional BAS sensitivity. Disordered eating can also relate to reduced trait mindfulness, which is a broadly defined construct. Trait mindfulness is positively correlated with attentional control (AC) which is a more specific component of our cognitive architecture that incorporates attentional focusing and attentional shifting processes. It is unknown how BIS and AC interact to predict restrictive disordered eating. We tested how self-reported BIS, BAS, and FFFS sensitivity, AC, and trait mindfulness relate to restrictive disordered eating in 464 healthy participants, and 177 participants with a history of psychiatric disorder. We provide new evidence that elevated restrictive disordered eating relates to reduced self-reported AC abilities (in addition to elevated BIS, and elevated FFFS sensitivity). We illustrate that the combination of high BIS and low AC predicts high levels of restrictive disordered eating (but not in all participants), whereas low BIS and high AC predicts lower levels of restrictive disordered eating (but not in all participants). We discuss how understanding the relationship between personality and attentional control can inform the design of future intervention studies.  \",\"PeriodicalId\":91096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of personality psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of personality psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21827/ijpp.7.37818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of personality psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/ijpp.7.37818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

修订后的强化敏感性理论(rRST)人格观点表明,神经心理行为抑制系统(BIS)、行为接近系统(BAS)和战斗-飞行冻结系统(FFFS)产生了接近和回避行为中涉及的关键人格特征。这种关于人格的观点可以作为理解精神病理学的框架。rRST的自我报告研究表明,限制性饮食紊乱与BIS敏感性升高、FFFS敏感性升高以及BAS敏感性可能失调有关。无序饮食也可能与特质正念的减少有关,正念是一个广义的概念。特质正念与注意力控制(AC)呈正相关,注意力控制是我们认知结构中一个更具体的组成部分,包含注意力集中和注意力转移过程。目前尚不清楚BIS和AC是如何相互作用来预测限制性饮食紊乱的。我们在464名健康参与者和177名有精神病史的参与者中测试了自我报告的BIS、BAS和FFFS敏感性、AC和特质正念与限制性饮食障碍的关系。我们提供了新的证据,证明限制性饮食紊乱的增加与自我报告的AC能力降低有关(除了BIS升高和FFFS敏感性升高之外)。我们表明,高BIS和低AC的组合预测了高水平的限制性饮食紊乱(但不是在所有参与者中),而低BIS和高AC预测了低水平的限制式饮食紊乱(而不是在所有的参与者中)。我们讨论了理解人格和注意力控制之间的关系如何为未来干预研究的设计提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are reinforcement sensitivity personality constructs and attentional control important predictors of restrictive disordered eating?
The revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (rRST) perspective on personality suggests that a neuropsychological behavioural inhibition system (BIS), behavioural approach system (BAS), and a fight-flight-freeze system (FFFS) produce the key personality traits involved in approach and avoidance behaviours. This perspective on personality can be used as a framework for understanding psychopathology. Self-report research on rRST suggests that restrictive disordered eating relates to elevated BIS sensitivity, elevated FFFS sensitivity, and possibly dysfunctional BAS sensitivity. Disordered eating can also relate to reduced trait mindfulness, which is a broadly defined construct. Trait mindfulness is positively correlated with attentional control (AC) which is a more specific component of our cognitive architecture that incorporates attentional focusing and attentional shifting processes. It is unknown how BIS and AC interact to predict restrictive disordered eating. We tested how self-reported BIS, BAS, and FFFS sensitivity, AC, and trait mindfulness relate to restrictive disordered eating in 464 healthy participants, and 177 participants with a history of psychiatric disorder. We provide new evidence that elevated restrictive disordered eating relates to reduced self-reported AC abilities (in addition to elevated BIS, and elevated FFFS sensitivity). We illustrate that the combination of high BIS and low AC predicts high levels of restrictive disordered eating (but not in all participants), whereas low BIS and high AC predicts lower levels of restrictive disordered eating (but not in all participants). We discuss how understanding the relationship between personality and attentional control can inform the design of future intervention studies.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding narcissistic spending: The connections between narcissistic personality traits and conspicuous consumption Idiographic assessment of attachment relationships: Construction and validation of scales for use in narrative psychotherapy Borderline personality features predict empathy for animals but not for children Narcissistic personality syndrome in relation to emotional states: Preliminary findings in a Dutch psychiatric outpatient sample Anxiously attached: Personality predictors of privacy attitudes, trust, and willingness to share information on the internet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1