罗伊诉韦德案50周年:论坛

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES Feminist Studies Pub Date : 2023-03-16 DOI:10.1353/fem.2022.0053
Karen Weingarten, J. Schoen, Belinda Waller-Peterson, Heather Latimer, Melissa Huerta, L. Reagan
{"title":"罗伊诉韦德案50周年:论坛","authors":"Karen Weingarten, J. Schoen, Belinda Waller-Peterson, Heather Latimer, Melissa Huerta, L. Reagan","doi":"10.1353/fem.2022.0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:January 22, 2023 will mark the 50th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court case that legalized abortion across the United States. This forum considers the case's legacy in light of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the case on June 24, 2022, which almost immediately caused half of American states to outlaw or curtail access to abortion. With contributions from Karen Weingarten, Johanna Schoen, Belinda Waller-Peterson, Heather Latimer, Melissa Huerta, and Leslie Reagan, this forum reflects on how Roe shaped—and sometimes limited—abortion access in the United States and the stories we tell about that access. Each of the contributors also considers Roe's legacy and its racial, economic, and gendered repercussions for bodily autonomy and reproductive health in today's political and cultural landscape. As several contributors note, the elimination of a national right to abortion will not impact all people equally, just as Roe's passage did not ensure equal access to abortion in 1973. This forum offers an elegy for Roe while also acknowledging its limitations as a means for securing the right to abortion.","PeriodicalId":35884,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"824 - 849"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fifty Years since Roe v. Wade: Forum\",\"authors\":\"Karen Weingarten, J. Schoen, Belinda Waller-Peterson, Heather Latimer, Melissa Huerta, L. Reagan\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/fem.2022.0053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:January 22, 2023 will mark the 50th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court case that legalized abortion across the United States. This forum considers the case's legacy in light of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the case on June 24, 2022, which almost immediately caused half of American states to outlaw or curtail access to abortion. With contributions from Karen Weingarten, Johanna Schoen, Belinda Waller-Peterson, Heather Latimer, Melissa Huerta, and Leslie Reagan, this forum reflects on how Roe shaped—and sometimes limited—abortion access in the United States and the stories we tell about that access. Each of the contributors also considers Roe's legacy and its racial, economic, and gendered repercussions for bodily autonomy and reproductive health in today's political and cultural landscape. As several contributors note, the elimination of a national right to abortion will not impact all people equally, just as Roe's passage did not ensure equal access to abortion in 1973. This forum offers an elegy for Roe while also acknowledging its limitations as a means for securing the right to abortion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Studies\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"824 - 849\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2022.0053\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2022.0053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:2023年1月22日将是最高法院里程碑式的堕胎合法化案件“罗诉韦德案”50周年。鉴于最高法院于2022年6月24日决定推翻该案,该论坛考虑了该案的遗留问题,该决定几乎立即导致美国一半的州禁止或限制堕胎。在Karen Weingarten、Johanna Schoen、Belinda Waller Peterson、Heather Latimer、Melissa Huerta和Leslie Reagan的贡献下,本论坛反思了Roe如何塑造——有时是有限的——美国堕胎机会,以及我们讲述的关于堕胎机会的故事。每位撰稿人还考虑了罗伊的遗产及其在当今政治和文化环境中对身体自主性和生殖健康的种族、经济和性别影响。正如几位撰稿人所指出的,取消全国堕胎权不会对所有人产生平等影响,就像1973年罗伊案的通过并没有确保平等堕胎一样。这个论坛为罗伊献上了挽歌,同时也承认其作为保障堕胎权手段的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fifty Years since Roe v. Wade: Forum
Abstract:January 22, 2023 will mark the 50th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court case that legalized abortion across the United States. This forum considers the case's legacy in light of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the case on June 24, 2022, which almost immediately caused half of American states to outlaw or curtail access to abortion. With contributions from Karen Weingarten, Johanna Schoen, Belinda Waller-Peterson, Heather Latimer, Melissa Huerta, and Leslie Reagan, this forum reflects on how Roe shaped—and sometimes limited—abortion access in the United States and the stories we tell about that access. Each of the contributors also considers Roe's legacy and its racial, economic, and gendered repercussions for bodily autonomy and reproductive health in today's political and cultural landscape. As several contributors note, the elimination of a national right to abortion will not impact all people equally, just as Roe's passage did not ensure equal access to abortion in 1973. This forum offers an elegy for Roe while also acknowledging its limitations as a means for securing the right to abortion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Studies
Feminist Studies Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Pleasures of the Hunt / We Must Be Creatures: Toward an Ecofeminist Hunting Ethic What Hungers Call Us Home? Engaging Autotheory Through Food Legal Landscapes Post-Roe: Shifts in Antiabortion Violence and Implications of the face Act Oasis by Necessity: The Post-Dobbs Landscape in Central Illinois "Brutality and its aftermath": Autotheoretical Engagements with Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1