{"title":"METHUSELAH WALK刚毛松漂浮年表的年代测定","authors":"M. Salzer, C. Pearson, C. Baisan","doi":"10.3959/1536-1098-75.1.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Two floating, ring-width chronologies predate the long bristlecone pine (Pinus longaeva) absolutely-dated, ring-width chronology from the Methuselah Walk (MWK) site in the White Mountains of California. The two non-overlapping floating chronologies were derived from samples that crossdate internally but are temporally unconnected to each other and to the nearly 9000-year, ring-width sequence that is crossdated to the calendar year. We used radiocarbon wiggle-matching and crossdating to place the two floating sequences more accurately in time and to better understand the temporal relationships between the three time series. The trees from the oldest floating sequence were alive near the beginning of the Pleistocene/Holocene boundary and they do not overlap with the other chronologies because of a gap of two-to-three centuries between the two floating series. However, the trees from the younger floating sequence likely do overlap with the long, calendar-dated MWK chronology. We find a possible 57-year overlap that connects these two. If confirmed with additional work, the resulting tree-ring dated annual record from this single location will span 10,359 years, a unique accomplishment in dendrochronology.","PeriodicalId":54416,"journal":{"name":"Tree-Ring Research","volume":"75 1","pages":"61 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DATING THE METHUSELAH WALK BRISTLECONE PINE FLOATING CHRONOLOGIES\",\"authors\":\"M. Salzer, C. Pearson, C. Baisan\",\"doi\":\"10.3959/1536-1098-75.1.61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Two floating, ring-width chronologies predate the long bristlecone pine (Pinus longaeva) absolutely-dated, ring-width chronology from the Methuselah Walk (MWK) site in the White Mountains of California. The two non-overlapping floating chronologies were derived from samples that crossdate internally but are temporally unconnected to each other and to the nearly 9000-year, ring-width sequence that is crossdated to the calendar year. We used radiocarbon wiggle-matching and crossdating to place the two floating sequences more accurately in time and to better understand the temporal relationships between the three time series. The trees from the oldest floating sequence were alive near the beginning of the Pleistocene/Holocene boundary and they do not overlap with the other chronologies because of a gap of two-to-three centuries between the two floating series. However, the trees from the younger floating sequence likely do overlap with the long, calendar-dated MWK chronology. We find a possible 57-year overlap that connects these two. If confirmed with additional work, the resulting tree-ring dated annual record from this single location will span 10,359 years, a unique accomplishment in dendrochronology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tree-Ring Research\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"61 - 66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tree-Ring Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3959/1536-1098-75.1.61\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree-Ring Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3959/1536-1098-75.1.61","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
DATING THE METHUSELAH WALK BRISTLECONE PINE FLOATING CHRONOLOGIES
ABSTRACT Two floating, ring-width chronologies predate the long bristlecone pine (Pinus longaeva) absolutely-dated, ring-width chronology from the Methuselah Walk (MWK) site in the White Mountains of California. The two non-overlapping floating chronologies were derived from samples that crossdate internally but are temporally unconnected to each other and to the nearly 9000-year, ring-width sequence that is crossdated to the calendar year. We used radiocarbon wiggle-matching and crossdating to place the two floating sequences more accurately in time and to better understand the temporal relationships between the three time series. The trees from the oldest floating sequence were alive near the beginning of the Pleistocene/Holocene boundary and they do not overlap with the other chronologies because of a gap of two-to-three centuries between the two floating series. However, the trees from the younger floating sequence likely do overlap with the long, calendar-dated MWK chronology. We find a possible 57-year overlap that connects these two. If confirmed with additional work, the resulting tree-ring dated annual record from this single location will span 10,359 years, a unique accomplishment in dendrochronology.
期刊介绍:
Tree-Ring Research (TRR) is devoted to papers dealing with the growth rings of trees and the applications of tree-ring research in a wide variety of fields, including but not limited to archaeology, geology, ecology, hydrology, climatology, forestry, and botany. Papers involving research results, new techniques of data acquisition or analysis, and regional or subject-oriented reviews or syntheses are considered for publication.
Scientific papers usually fall into two main categories. Articles should not exceed 5000 words, or approximately 20 double-spaced typewritten pages, including tables, references, and an abstract of 200 words or fewer. All manuscripts submitted as Articles are reviewed by at least two referees. Research Reports, which are usually reviewed by at least one outside referee, should not exceed 1500 words or include more than two figures. Research Reports address technical developments, describe well-documented but preliminary research results, or present findings for which the Article format is not appropriate. Book or monograph Reviews of 500 words or less are also considered. Other categories of papers are occasionally published. All papers are published only in English. Abstracts of the Articles or Reports may be printed in other languages if supplied by the author(s) with English translations.