2012年《南非使用官方语言法》第4(2)(b)条(对以前被边缘化的土著官方语言)的影响分析

Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.2989/16073614.2022.2058567
Lutamo Shadrack Ramuedzisi
{"title":"2012年《南非使用官方语言法》第4(2)(b)条(对以前被边缘化的土著官方语言)的影响分析","authors":"Lutamo Shadrack Ramuedzisi","doi":"10.2989/16073614.2022.2058567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article focuses on the application of chapter 4(2)(b) of the Use of Official Languages Act (UOLA), 2012. The UOLA was passed to correct the past linguistic imbalances by implementing the provisions of Section 6 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 for the official status of the indigenous languages. Chapter 4(2)(b) pertains to the selection of official languages of the Republic of South Africa to ensure they are used in official documents in government departments. The research question is whether the Act positively or negatively impacted the use of previously marginalised languages. The study uses the mixed methods approach. The data were gathered from the language policies of about 41 national government departments. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data analysis revealed that the status quo has been retained in Afrikaans and English. There is only minimal change observed, as they were treated equally in the previous regime. Previously marginalised African languages still do not find room in the current regime, which leaves them lower in the pecking order in the selection as official languages in departments. The study made some recommendations which can assist the previously marginalised languages to enjoy their official status.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of the impact of section 4(2)(b) of the South African Use of Official Languages Act of 2012 (on previously marginalised indigenous official languages)\",\"authors\":\"Lutamo Shadrack Ramuedzisi\",\"doi\":\"10.2989/16073614.2022.2058567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article focuses on the application of chapter 4(2)(b) of the Use of Official Languages Act (UOLA), 2012. The UOLA was passed to correct the past linguistic imbalances by implementing the provisions of Section 6 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 for the official status of the indigenous languages. Chapter 4(2)(b) pertains to the selection of official languages of the Republic of South Africa to ensure they are used in official documents in government departments. The research question is whether the Act positively or negatively impacted the use of previously marginalised languages. The study uses the mixed methods approach. The data were gathered from the language policies of about 41 national government departments. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data analysis revealed that the status quo has been retained in Afrikaans and English. There is only minimal change observed, as they were treated equally in the previous regime. Previously marginalised African languages still do not find room in the current regime, which leaves them lower in the pecking order in the selection as official languages in departments. The study made some recommendations which can assist the previously marginalised languages to enjoy their official status.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2022.2058567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2022.2058567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文主要研究2012年《官方语言使用法》(UOLA)第4(2)(b)章的适用问题。通过《土著语文法》是为了执行1996年《南非共和国宪法》第6节关于土著语文正式地位的规定,纠正过去的语言不平衡现象。第4(2)(b)章涉及南非共和国官方语言的选择,以确保在政府部门的官方文件中使用这些语言。研究的问题是,该法案对以前被边缘化的语言的使用是积极的还是消极的影响。本研究采用混合方法。这些数据是从大约41个国家政府部门的语言政策中收集的。进行了半结构化访谈。数据分析显示,南非荷兰语和英语保持现状。观察到的变化很小,因为他们在前政权中受到平等对待。以前被边缘化的非洲语言在目前的制度中仍然找不到一席之地,这使得它们在各部门的官方语言选择中处于较低的地位。这项研究提出了一些建议,可以帮助以前被边缘化的语言享有其官方地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
An analysis of the impact of section 4(2)(b) of the South African Use of Official Languages Act of 2012 (on previously marginalised indigenous official languages)
Abstract This article focuses on the application of chapter 4(2)(b) of the Use of Official Languages Act (UOLA), 2012. The UOLA was passed to correct the past linguistic imbalances by implementing the provisions of Section 6 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 for the official status of the indigenous languages. Chapter 4(2)(b) pertains to the selection of official languages of the Republic of South Africa to ensure they are used in official documents in government departments. The research question is whether the Act positively or negatively impacted the use of previously marginalised languages. The study uses the mixed methods approach. The data were gathered from the language policies of about 41 national government departments. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data analysis revealed that the status quo has been retained in Afrikaans and English. There is only minimal change observed, as they were treated equally in the previous regime. Previously marginalised African languages still do not find room in the current regime, which leaves them lower in the pecking order in the selection as official languages in departments. The study made some recommendations which can assist the previously marginalised languages to enjoy their official status.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1