未实现的承诺和空洞的主张:澳大利亚未能根据《残疾人权利公约》履行其教育残疾学生的国际义务

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Australian Journal of Education Pub Date : 2022-10-04 DOI:10.1177/00049441221127454
Catia Malaquias
{"title":"未实现的承诺和空洞的主张:澳大利亚未能根据《残疾人权利公约》履行其教育残疾学生的国际义务","authors":"Catia Malaquias","doi":"10.1177/00049441221127454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) in 2006 and, in particular, Article 24 was a landmark in the struggle of people with disability for recognition of their fundamental human rights, including their right to education. As a legally binding treaty under international law, imposing obligations on States Parties that signed and ratified it (including Australia), it required those States Parties to bring their domestic legislation into conformity with their CRPD obligations. The Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA), and the Disability Standards for Education 2005 (Standards) made under it, remain the principal Australian statutory protection of the rights of students with disability to access education on the basis of equality and non-discrimination even though the DDA and the Standards preceded the CRPD. This article explores the proposition that the DDA and the Standards do not adequately implement Australia’s international legal obligations in relation to the education of students with disability. Note: This article makes use of agreed or legally defined terms. These terms are presented in italics throughout.","PeriodicalId":46741,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Education","volume":"66 1","pages":"235 - 250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unrealised promises and hollow claims: Australia’s failure to enact its international obligations under the CRPD for the education of students with disability\",\"authors\":\"Catia Malaquias\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00049441221127454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) in 2006 and, in particular, Article 24 was a landmark in the struggle of people with disability for recognition of their fundamental human rights, including their right to education. As a legally binding treaty under international law, imposing obligations on States Parties that signed and ratified it (including Australia), it required those States Parties to bring their domestic legislation into conformity with their CRPD obligations. The Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA), and the Disability Standards for Education 2005 (Standards) made under it, remain the principal Australian statutory protection of the rights of students with disability to access education on the basis of equality and non-discrimination even though the DDA and the Standards preceded the CRPD. This article explores the proposition that the DDA and the Standards do not adequately implement Australia’s international legal obligations in relation to the education of students with disability. Note: This article makes use of agreed or legally defined terms. These terms are presented in italics throughout.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"235 - 250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441221127454\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441221127454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2006年通过的《联合国残疾人权利公约》(CRPD),特别是第24条,是残疾人争取其基本人权,包括受教育权得到承认的斗争中的一个里程碑。作为一项具有法律约束力的国际法条约,它对签署和批准该条约的缔约国(包括澳大利亚)施加了义务,要求这些缔约国使其国内立法符合其《残疾人权利公约》的义务。1992年《残疾歧视法》和根据该法制定的2005年《残疾教育标准》仍然是澳大利亚对残疾学生在平等和不歧视的基础上接受教育的权利的主要法定保护,尽管《残疾歧视法》和《标准》早于《残疾人权利公约》。这篇文章探讨了DDA和标准没有充分履行澳大利亚在残疾学生教育方面的国际法律义务的命题。注:本文使用约定或法律定义的术语。这些术语在整个过程中以斜体表示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unrealised promises and hollow claims: Australia’s failure to enact its international obligations under the CRPD for the education of students with disability
The adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) in 2006 and, in particular, Article 24 was a landmark in the struggle of people with disability for recognition of their fundamental human rights, including their right to education. As a legally binding treaty under international law, imposing obligations on States Parties that signed and ratified it (including Australia), it required those States Parties to bring their domestic legislation into conformity with their CRPD obligations. The Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (DDA), and the Disability Standards for Education 2005 (Standards) made under it, remain the principal Australian statutory protection of the rights of students with disability to access education on the basis of equality and non-discrimination even though the DDA and the Standards preceded the CRPD. This article explores the proposition that the DDA and the Standards do not adequately implement Australia’s international legal obligations in relation to the education of students with disability. Note: This article makes use of agreed or legally defined terms. These terms are presented in italics throughout.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Education
Australian Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Education was established in 1957 under the editorship of Professor Bill Connell. Drawing upon research conducted in Australia and internationally, the AJE aims to inform educational researchers as well as educators, administrators and policymakers about issues of contemporary concern in education. The AJE seeks to publish research studies that contribute to educational knowledge and research methodologies, and that review findings of research studies. Its scope embraces all fields of education and training. In addition to publishing research studies about education it also publishes articles that address education in relation to other fields.
期刊最新文献
Associations between mental health profiles and later school outcomes Indigenous Early Career Researcher’s Perspectives of ‘safe spaces’’ in Higher Education Issues in staffing and outsourcing in schools. Who’s teaching health and physical education? The level of predictability of past reading attainment and self-perception and behavioural measures on children’s reading achievement Creating and enacting culturally responsive assessment for First Nations students in higher education settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1