2017年《减税与就业法案》国际税收规定对美国跨国公司支出和投资决策的影响

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of the American Taxation Association Pub Date : 2022-02-18 DOI:10.2308/jata-2020-037
Brooke D. Beyer, Jimmy F. Downes, Mollie E. Mathis, Eric T. Rapley
{"title":"2017年《减税与就业法案》国际税收规定对美国跨国公司支出和投资决策的影响","authors":"Brooke D. Beyer, Jimmy F. Downes, Mollie E. Mathis, Eric T. Rapley","doi":"10.2308/jata-2020-037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) dramatically changed U.S. taxation of foreign earnings for U.S. multinational companies (MNCs). Specifically, the TCJA required taxation of existing unremitted foreign earnings through a deemed repatriation and effectively eliminated future repatriation taxes through a 100 percent dividends received deduction. Additionally, the bill introduced the global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) regime. We examine MNCs’ responses to the TCJA and find that spending and investment behavior depends on liquidity, investment opportunities, and borrowing costs. Domestic capital expenditures and share repurchases increased for MNCs with low domestic liquidity and high domestic investment opportunities. In contrast, MNCs with low domestic liquidity (high cost of debt) and low domestic investment opportunities increased dividends (decreased debt). Finally, we find that MNCs with high foreign cash and most vulnerable to the GILTI regime increased their foreign but not domestic capital expenditures—a potential unintended consequence.","PeriodicalId":45477,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Taxation Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"U.S. Multinational Companies’ Payout and Investment Decisions in Response to International Tax Provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017\",\"authors\":\"Brooke D. Beyer, Jimmy F. Downes, Mollie E. Mathis, Eric T. Rapley\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/jata-2020-037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) dramatically changed U.S. taxation of foreign earnings for U.S. multinational companies (MNCs). Specifically, the TCJA required taxation of existing unremitted foreign earnings through a deemed repatriation and effectively eliminated future repatriation taxes through a 100 percent dividends received deduction. Additionally, the bill introduced the global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) regime. We examine MNCs’ responses to the TCJA and find that spending and investment behavior depends on liquidity, investment opportunities, and borrowing costs. Domestic capital expenditures and share repurchases increased for MNCs with low domestic liquidity and high domestic investment opportunities. In contrast, MNCs with low domestic liquidity (high cost of debt) and low domestic investment opportunities increased dividends (decreased debt). Finally, we find that MNCs with high foreign cash and most vulnerable to the GILTI regime increased their foreign but not domestic capital expenditures—a potential unintended consequence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Taxation Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Taxation Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/jata-2020-037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Taxation Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jata-2020-037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

《2017年减税和就业法案》(TCJA)极大地改变了美国对美国跨国公司(MNCs)海外收入的征税。具体来说,TCJA要求通过视同汇回对现有未汇出的外国收入征税,并通过100%的股息扣除有效地消除未来的汇回税。此外,该法案还引入了全球无形低税收入(GILTI)制度。我们研究了跨国公司对TCJA的反应,发现支出和投资行为取决于流动性、投资机会和借贷成本。国内流动性低而国内投资机会高的跨国公司的国内资本支出和股票回购增加。相比之下,国内流动性低(债务成本高)和国内投资机会低的跨国公司增加了股息(债务减少)。最后,我们发现,拥有大量海外现金且最容易受到GILTI制度影响的跨国公司增加了海外资本支出,而不是国内资本支出——这是一个潜在的意外后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
U.S. Multinational Companies’ Payout and Investment Decisions in Response to International Tax Provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA) dramatically changed U.S. taxation of foreign earnings for U.S. multinational companies (MNCs). Specifically, the TCJA required taxation of existing unremitted foreign earnings through a deemed repatriation and effectively eliminated future repatriation taxes through a 100 percent dividends received deduction. Additionally, the bill introduced the global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) regime. We examine MNCs’ responses to the TCJA and find that spending and investment behavior depends on liquidity, investment opportunities, and borrowing costs. Domestic capital expenditures and share repurchases increased for MNCs with low domestic liquidity and high domestic investment opportunities. In contrast, MNCs with low domestic liquidity (high cost of debt) and low domestic investment opportunities increased dividends (decreased debt). Finally, we find that MNCs with high foreign cash and most vulnerable to the GILTI regime increased their foreign but not domestic capital expenditures—a potential unintended consequence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Managers’ Stock Price Incentives and Earnings Management Using Tax Expense The Efficiency of Interactive Voice Response Systems and Tax Compliance: A Field Experiment by the California Franchise Tax Board Editorial Policy DISCUSSION OF Companies’ Initial Estimates of the One-Time Transition Tax Imposed by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Summaries of Papers In This Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1