看不见的创始人:两个世纪的非裔美国家庭如何将一个种植园变成一所大学

Q1 Social Sciences Southeastern Archaeology Pub Date : 2021-12-29 DOI:10.1080/0734578x.2021.2016148
Katie Zejdlik
{"title":"看不见的创始人:两个世纪的非裔美国家庭如何将一个种植园变成一所大学","authors":"Katie Zejdlik","doi":"10.1080/0734578x.2021.2016148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"whole. This is a problem that needs to be ameliorated at a higher level by archaeologists collaborating across state lines. Another concern is that mound building does not emerge until the chapter on Woodland-period sites. This is due to the fact that there do not appear to be any knownArchaic-periodmound sites in northwest Louisiana, but this means that the inexperienced reader may draw the conclusion that Archaic-period peoples did not build mounds at all. In fact, the author definitively states that “Archaic-period people living in the Red River drainage of northwest Louisiana did not constructmounds” (28). I challenge this by positing that while archaeological investigations may not have yet provided evidence of such activity in the region, this does not mean that these people did not travel outside of the area and participate in such activities elsewhere. The author does recognize the existence of nearby Watson Brake and Poverty Point during the Archaic-period in northeast Louisiana, but discusses these as a lead-in to the chapter on Woodland-period sites. This means that the discussion in the earlier chapter on Paleoindianand Archaic-period archaeology is artificially separated from contemporaneous mound building activities in which the Caddo ancestors may have participated. Despite these criticisms, I would like to recommend this book to anyone who is interested in the archaeology of the southeastern United States. The book is succinct and relatively short yet served as a good primer for me as an archaeologist recently relocated to southeast Arkansas who is learning about the region for the first time. The abundance of maps, drawings, and photographs also make it visually appealing. One can use this volume as a handy reference to important sites and publications related to the region as well as a good example of how archaeology is done more generally in the Southeast.","PeriodicalId":34945,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Archaeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Invisible Founders: How Two Centuries of African American Families Transformed a Plantation into a College\",\"authors\":\"Katie Zejdlik\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0734578x.2021.2016148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"whole. This is a problem that needs to be ameliorated at a higher level by archaeologists collaborating across state lines. Another concern is that mound building does not emerge until the chapter on Woodland-period sites. This is due to the fact that there do not appear to be any knownArchaic-periodmound sites in northwest Louisiana, but this means that the inexperienced reader may draw the conclusion that Archaic-period peoples did not build mounds at all. In fact, the author definitively states that “Archaic-period people living in the Red River drainage of northwest Louisiana did not constructmounds” (28). I challenge this by positing that while archaeological investigations may not have yet provided evidence of such activity in the region, this does not mean that these people did not travel outside of the area and participate in such activities elsewhere. The author does recognize the existence of nearby Watson Brake and Poverty Point during the Archaic-period in northeast Louisiana, but discusses these as a lead-in to the chapter on Woodland-period sites. This means that the discussion in the earlier chapter on Paleoindianand Archaic-period archaeology is artificially separated from contemporaneous mound building activities in which the Caddo ancestors may have participated. Despite these criticisms, I would like to recommend this book to anyone who is interested in the archaeology of the southeastern United States. The book is succinct and relatively short yet served as a good primer for me as an archaeologist recently relocated to southeast Arkansas who is learning about the region for the first time. The abundance of maps, drawings, and photographs also make it visually appealing. One can use this volume as a handy reference to important sites and publications related to the region as well as a good example of how archaeology is done more generally in the Southeast.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southeastern Archaeology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southeastern Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0734578x.2021.2016148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeastern Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0734578x.2021.2016148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

整体。这是一个需要考古学家跨州合作在更高层次上改善的问题。另一个问题是,直到伍德兰时期的遗址这一章才出现土墩建筑。这是因为在路易斯安那州西北部似乎没有任何已知的古代时期的遗址,但这意味着没有经验的读者可能会得出这样的结论:古代时期的人根本不建造土堆。事实上,作者明确地指出,“居住在路易斯安那州西北部红河流域的古代人并不建造土墩”(28)。我的质疑是,虽然考古调查可能尚未提供该地区此类活动的证据,但这并不意味着这些人没有走出该地区,在其他地方参与此类活动。作者确实认识到路易斯安那州东北部古代史时期附近的沃森布雷克(Watson Brake)和贫困点(Poverty Point)的存在,但讨论这些是作为伍德兰时期遗址一章的引子。这意味着前一章关于古印地安那和古代考古的讨论被人为地从卡多祖先可能参与的同时期的土丘建筑活动中分离出来。尽管有这些批评,我还是想把这本书推荐给任何对美国东南部考古学感兴趣的人。这本书简洁,篇幅相对较短,但对于我这个最近搬到阿肯色州东南部的考古学家来说,这本书是一本很好的入门读物,我是第一次了解这个地区。丰富的地图、图纸和照片也使它在视觉上很有吸引力。人们可以使用这本书作为与该地区有关的重要地点和出版物的方便参考,以及如何在东南部更普遍地进行考古的一个很好的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Invisible Founders: How Two Centuries of African American Families Transformed a Plantation into a College
whole. This is a problem that needs to be ameliorated at a higher level by archaeologists collaborating across state lines. Another concern is that mound building does not emerge until the chapter on Woodland-period sites. This is due to the fact that there do not appear to be any knownArchaic-periodmound sites in northwest Louisiana, but this means that the inexperienced reader may draw the conclusion that Archaic-period peoples did not build mounds at all. In fact, the author definitively states that “Archaic-period people living in the Red River drainage of northwest Louisiana did not constructmounds” (28). I challenge this by positing that while archaeological investigations may not have yet provided evidence of such activity in the region, this does not mean that these people did not travel outside of the area and participate in such activities elsewhere. The author does recognize the existence of nearby Watson Brake and Poverty Point during the Archaic-period in northeast Louisiana, but discusses these as a lead-in to the chapter on Woodland-period sites. This means that the discussion in the earlier chapter on Paleoindianand Archaic-period archaeology is artificially separated from contemporaneous mound building activities in which the Caddo ancestors may have participated. Despite these criticisms, I would like to recommend this book to anyone who is interested in the archaeology of the southeastern United States. The book is succinct and relatively short yet served as a good primer for me as an archaeologist recently relocated to southeast Arkansas who is learning about the region for the first time. The abundance of maps, drawings, and photographs also make it visually appealing. One can use this volume as a handy reference to important sites and publications related to the region as well as a good example of how archaeology is done more generally in the Southeast.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Southeastern Archaeology
Southeastern Archaeology Social Sciences-Archeology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Southeastern Archaeology is a refereed journal that publishes works concerning the archaeology and history of southeastern North America and neighboring regions. It covers all time periods, from Paleoindian to recent history and defines the southeast broadly; this could be anything from Florida (south) to Wisconsin (North) and from Oklahoma (west) to Virginia (east). Reports or articles that cover neighboring regions such as the Northeast, Plains, or Caribbean would be considered if they had sufficient relevance.
期刊最新文献
Sixteenth-century European metal artifacts from the Marengo complex, Alabama Cultural and chronological variation in Woodland and Mississippian mortuary practices on the edge of Greater Cahokia Tick Island Incised: an early ceramic skeuomorph in Late Archaic Florida Life in a Mississippian warscape: common fields, Cahokia, and the effects of warfare A Dark Pathway: Precontact Native American Glyphs from 1st Unnamed Cave, Tennessee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1