长链非编码RNA LINC01060在胃癌中的诊断价值

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-04 DOI:10.1515/labmed-2022-0010
Junhui Huang, Junrong Wu, Zuojian Hu, Cuiju Mo, Hua-ping Chen, Liuyi Lu, Mingxing Chen, Xiamei Huang, Xue Qin
{"title":"长链非编码RNA LINC01060在胃癌中的诊断价值","authors":"Junhui Huang, Junrong Wu, Zuojian Hu, Cuiju Mo, Hua-ping Chen, Liuyi Lu, Mingxing Chen, Xiamei Huang, Xue Qin","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2022-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Gastric cancer (GC) is a common gastrointestinal tumor that threatens human health. The sensitivity and specificity of traditional tumor markers do not meet the requirements for detection of GC. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are crucial for the development of tumors. Hence, in this study, LINC01060 will be evaluated for its diagnostic value in GC. Methods Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to determine the relative expression levels of LINC01060 in GC tissues and blood samples. In addition, the relationship between the expression levels of LINC01060 and the clinicopathological features of the patients was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to assess the diagnostic efficacy of LINC01060, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in GC. Results The expression of LINC01060 was found to have decreased in GC tissues (p<0.01). Notably, compared with peptic ulcers and healthy controls, the expression levels of LINC01060 in the whole blood of GC patients was found to have decreased. Furthermore, LINC01060 exhibited higher sensitivity and specificity than CEA and CA19-9 in differentiating GC from healthy controls (AUC=0.872, sensitivity=96.0%, specificity=76.7%). With regard to traditional biomarkers, the AUC of CEA and CA19-9 were 0.715 (sensitivity=86.0%, specificity=50.0%) and 0.634 (sensitivity=63.0%, specificity=76.0%), respectively. Remarkably, the other gastrointestinal tumors did not show any statistically significant differences. The presence of LINC01060 was not found to be significantly associated with characteristic clinicopathological factors. Conclusions LINC01060 might be useful as a biomarker for diagnosing GC and distinguishing GC patients from healthy controls.","PeriodicalId":55986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic value of long noncoding RNA LINC01060 in gastric cancer\",\"authors\":\"Junhui Huang, Junrong Wu, Zuojian Hu, Cuiju Mo, Hua-ping Chen, Liuyi Lu, Mingxing Chen, Xiamei Huang, Xue Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/labmed-2022-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives Gastric cancer (GC) is a common gastrointestinal tumor that threatens human health. The sensitivity and specificity of traditional tumor markers do not meet the requirements for detection of GC. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are crucial for the development of tumors. Hence, in this study, LINC01060 will be evaluated for its diagnostic value in GC. Methods Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to determine the relative expression levels of LINC01060 in GC tissues and blood samples. In addition, the relationship between the expression levels of LINC01060 and the clinicopathological features of the patients was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to assess the diagnostic efficacy of LINC01060, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in GC. Results The expression of LINC01060 was found to have decreased in GC tissues (p<0.01). Notably, compared with peptic ulcers and healthy controls, the expression levels of LINC01060 in the whole blood of GC patients was found to have decreased. Furthermore, LINC01060 exhibited higher sensitivity and specificity than CEA and CA19-9 in differentiating GC from healthy controls (AUC=0.872, sensitivity=96.0%, specificity=76.7%). With regard to traditional biomarkers, the AUC of CEA and CA19-9 were 0.715 (sensitivity=86.0%, specificity=50.0%) and 0.634 (sensitivity=63.0%, specificity=76.0%), respectively. Remarkably, the other gastrointestinal tumors did not show any statistically significant differences. The presence of LINC01060 was not found to be significantly associated with characteristic clinicopathological factors. Conclusions LINC01060 might be useful as a biomarker for diagnosing GC and distinguishing GC patients from healthy controls.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2022-0010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2022-0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的癌症是一种常见的威胁人类健康的胃肠道肿瘤。传统肿瘤标志物的敏感性和特异性已不能满足GC检测的要求。长链非编码RNA(lncRNA)对肿瘤的发展至关重要。因此,在本研究中,将评估LINC01060在GC中的诊断价值。方法采用实时定量聚合酶链式反应(qRT-PCR)测定LINC01060在GC组织和血液样品中的相对表达水平。此外,还分析了LINC01060的表达水平与患者临床病理特征之间的关系。受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线用于评估LINC01060、癌胚抗原(CEA)和碳水化合物抗原19-9(CA19-9)在GC中的诊断功效。结果胃癌组织中LINC01060的表达明显下降(p<0.01),胃癌患者全血中LINC0060的表达水平较消化性溃疡和健康对照组明显下降。此外,在区分GC和健康对照方面,LINC01060表现出比CEA和CA19-9更高的敏感性和特异性(AUC=0.872,敏感性=96.0%,特异性=76.7%)。对于传统生物标志物,CEA和CA19-9的AUC分别为0.715(敏感性=86.0%,特异性=50.0%)和0.634(敏感性=63.0%,特异度=76.0%)。值得注意的是,其他胃肠道肿瘤没有显示出任何统计学上的显著差异。未发现LINC01060的存在与特征性临床病理因素显著相关。结论LINC01060可作为GC诊断和区分GC患者与健康对照的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic value of long noncoding RNA LINC01060 in gastric cancer
Abstract Objectives Gastric cancer (GC) is a common gastrointestinal tumor that threatens human health. The sensitivity and specificity of traditional tumor markers do not meet the requirements for detection of GC. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are crucial for the development of tumors. Hence, in this study, LINC01060 will be evaluated for its diagnostic value in GC. Methods Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to determine the relative expression levels of LINC01060 in GC tissues and blood samples. In addition, the relationship between the expression levels of LINC01060 and the clinicopathological features of the patients was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to assess the diagnostic efficacy of LINC01060, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in GC. Results The expression of LINC01060 was found to have decreased in GC tissues (p<0.01). Notably, compared with peptic ulcers and healthy controls, the expression levels of LINC01060 in the whole blood of GC patients was found to have decreased. Furthermore, LINC01060 exhibited higher sensitivity and specificity than CEA and CA19-9 in differentiating GC from healthy controls (AUC=0.872, sensitivity=96.0%, specificity=76.7%). With regard to traditional biomarkers, the AUC of CEA and CA19-9 were 0.715 (sensitivity=86.0%, specificity=50.0%) and 0.634 (sensitivity=63.0%, specificity=76.0%), respectively. Remarkably, the other gastrointestinal tumors did not show any statistically significant differences. The presence of LINC01060 was not found to be significantly associated with characteristic clinicopathological factors. Conclusions LINC01060 might be useful as a biomarker for diagnosing GC and distinguishing GC patients from healthy controls.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Laboratory Medicine Mathematics-Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Laboratory Medicine (JLM) is a bi-monthly published journal that reports on the latest developments in laboratory medicine. Particular focus is placed on the diagnostic aspects of the clinical laboratory, although technical, regulatory, and educational topics are equally covered. The Journal specializes in the publication of high-standard, competent and timely review articles on clinical, methodological and pathogenic aspects of modern laboratory diagnostics. These reviews are critically reviewed by expert reviewers and JLM’s Associate Editors who are specialists in the various subdisciplines of laboratory medicine. In addition, JLM publishes original research articles, case reports, point/counterpoint articles and letters to the editor, all of which are peer reviewed by at least two experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the stability of uncentrifuged serum and plasma analytes at various post-collection intervals How Gaussian mixture modelling can help to verify reference intervals from laboratory data with a high proportion of pathological values Using machine learning techniques for exploration and classification of laboratory data Automated sex and age partitioning for the estimation of reference intervals using a regression tree model Serum LDH and its isoenzymes (LDH2 and LDH5) associated with predictive value for refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1