《可持续渔业管理与国际法:孟加拉国和孟加拉湾的海洋渔业》,阿卜杜拉·阿里夫著。劳特利奇国际环境法研究系列。伦敦:劳特利奇,2021年。xxii+208页,精装本/电子书:84.00英镑;25.89英镑。doi:10.4324/9781003080541。

Arron N. Honniball
{"title":"《可持续渔业管理与国际法:孟加拉国和孟加拉湾的海洋渔业》,阿卜杜拉·阿里夫著。劳特利奇国际环境法研究系列。伦敦:劳特利奇,2021年。xxii+208页,精装本/电子书:84.00英镑;25.89英镑。doi:10.4324/9781003080541。","authors":"Arron N. Honniball","doi":"10.1017/s2044251322000637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"dispute settlement mechanism given its applaudable accomplishments. In advancing his proposal to preserve the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, Mavroidis assumes that the collective will of the membership is aimed at resisting populism and de-politicizing the adjudication process – the cornerstone of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. This assumption, and his confidence, may be contestable in view of the diversity of the WTO membership, in particular in contrast to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade era. The capacity of the GATT regime to de-politicize trade disputes largely lies in the political and economic homogeneity of the membership, but this is not the case for the WTO. Also, as WTO rules become more intrusive and the global economy more integrated, depoliticizing trade disputes seems more challenging than ever. This need not necessarily lead to pessimism or doom, but it is the new reality we face and cannot be neglected when considering the future of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism.","PeriodicalId":43342,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of International Law","volume":"13 1","pages":"190 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable Fisheries Management and International Law: Marine Fisheries in Bangladesh and the Bay of Bengal by Abdullah-Al ARIF. Routledge Research in International Environmental Law Series. London: Routledge, 2021. xxii + 208 pp. Hardcover/eBook: £84.00; £25.89. doi:10.4324/9781003080541.\",\"authors\":\"Arron N. Honniball\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s2044251322000637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"dispute settlement mechanism given its applaudable accomplishments. In advancing his proposal to preserve the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, Mavroidis assumes that the collective will of the membership is aimed at resisting populism and de-politicizing the adjudication process – the cornerstone of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. This assumption, and his confidence, may be contestable in view of the diversity of the WTO membership, in particular in contrast to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade era. The capacity of the GATT regime to de-politicize trade disputes largely lies in the political and economic homogeneity of the membership, but this is not the case for the WTO. Also, as WTO rules become more intrusive and the global economy more integrated, depoliticizing trade disputes seems more challenging than ever. This need not necessarily lead to pessimism or doom, but it is the new reality we face and cannot be neglected when considering the future of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"190 - 191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s2044251322000637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s2044251322000637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

争端解决机制取得了可喜的成就。在提出保留世贸组织争端解决机制的建议时,马夫罗伊迪斯认为,成员国的集体意愿旨在抵制民粹主义,并将裁决过程非政治化——这是世贸组织争端解决机构的基石。鉴于世贸组织成员的多样性,特别是与《关税及贸易总协定》时代相比,这一假设和他的信心可能是有争议的。关贸总协定制度将贸易争端非政治化的能力主要在于成员国的政治和经济同质性,但世贸组织并非如此。此外,随着世贸组织规则变得更具侵入性,全球经济更加一体化,贸易争端的非政治化似乎比以往任何时候都更具挑战性。这不一定会导致悲观或厄运,但这是我们面临的新现实,在考虑世贸组织争端解决机制的未来时不能忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainable Fisheries Management and International Law: Marine Fisheries in Bangladesh and the Bay of Bengal by Abdullah-Al ARIF. Routledge Research in International Environmental Law Series. London: Routledge, 2021. xxii + 208 pp. Hardcover/eBook: £84.00; £25.89. doi:10.4324/9781003080541.
dispute settlement mechanism given its applaudable accomplishments. In advancing his proposal to preserve the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, Mavroidis assumes that the collective will of the membership is aimed at resisting populism and de-politicizing the adjudication process – the cornerstone of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. This assumption, and his confidence, may be contestable in view of the diversity of the WTO membership, in particular in contrast to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade era. The capacity of the GATT regime to de-politicize trade disputes largely lies in the political and economic homogeneity of the membership, but this is not the case for the WTO. Also, as WTO rules become more intrusive and the global economy more integrated, depoliticizing trade disputes seems more challenging than ever. This need not necessarily lead to pessimism or doom, but it is the new reality we face and cannot be neglected when considering the future of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
58
期刊最新文献
C.H. Alexandrowicz's India and the Kautilyan Moment Reconceptualizing Norm Conflict in International Law Copyright Protection for AI-Generated Works: Exploring Originality and Ownership in a Digital Landscape Pragmatic Monism: The Practice of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in Engaging with International Law Conceptual (Re)Constructions of International Law edited by Kostiantyn GORBETS, Andreas HADJIGEORGIOU, and Pauline WESTERMAN. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022. x + 260 pp. Hardcover: AUD $185.55; eBook: AUD $49.08. doi: 10.4337/9781800373006
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1