在印度种植从业者的放射处方实践:一项横断面调查

Aushili Mahule
{"title":"在印度种植从业者的放射处方实践:一项横断面调查","authors":"Aushili Mahule","doi":"10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-4(1)-117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To identify the contemporary radiographic prescription practices among the dental implant practitioners in India.\n\nMaterials and method: Two clinicians interviewed four hundred dentists using a 13-question questionnaire for commonly prescribed imaging modality options for implant treatment planning and assessment. The parameters included commonly available imaging techniques, exposure of radiation to the patient, coverage area of teeth and surrounding facial bones, ease of availability and the cost effectiveness. The interview was conducted by two operators to eliminate subject bias. CbctThe data collected was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS version 22, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).\n\nResults: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was found to be the most prescribed imaging modality prescribed by 44.2% of the dentists followed by orthopantograph (OPG) (17.9%). A combination of imaging modalities was preferred by 21.9% of dentists. The intraoral periapical radiographs (IOPA) were prescribed by 12.3% while conventional tomography was prescribed by 2.5% of the dentists. Precision of the imaging modality (51.2) reduced exposure to radiation (19.8) and ease of availability (13%) were the reasons for selection of radiograph prescription.\n\nConclusion: According to the study, cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) appeared as the most prescribed imaging modality followed by OPG. Precise measurements were cited as the main reason for selecting a radiographic technique followed by the less exposure of the patient to radiation and easy availability of the modality.","PeriodicalId":92922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiographic Prescription Practices Among Implant Practitioners In India: A Cross-sectional Survey\",\"authors\":\"Aushili Mahule\",\"doi\":\"10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-4(1)-117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To identify the contemporary radiographic prescription practices among the dental implant practitioners in India.\\n\\nMaterials and method: Two clinicians interviewed four hundred dentists using a 13-question questionnaire for commonly prescribed imaging modality options for implant treatment planning and assessment. The parameters included commonly available imaging techniques, exposure of radiation to the patient, coverage area of teeth and surrounding facial bones, ease of availability and the cost effectiveness. The interview was conducted by two operators to eliminate subject bias. CbctThe data collected was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS version 22, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).\\n\\nResults: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was found to be the most prescribed imaging modality prescribed by 44.2% of the dentists followed by orthopantograph (OPG) (17.9%). A combination of imaging modalities was preferred by 21.9% of dentists. The intraoral periapical radiographs (IOPA) were prescribed by 12.3% while conventional tomography was prescribed by 2.5% of the dentists. Precision of the imaging modality (51.2) reduced exposure to radiation (19.8) and ease of availability (13%) were the reasons for selection of radiograph prescription.\\n\\nConclusion: According to the study, cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) appeared as the most prescribed imaging modality followed by OPG. Precise measurements were cited as the main reason for selecting a radiographic technique followed by the less exposure of the patient to radiation and easy availability of the modality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-4(1)-117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-4(1)-117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解印度种植牙从业者的当代放射学处方实践。材料和方法:两名临床医生使用13个问题的问卷调查了400名牙医,以了解植入物治疗计划和评估的常见成像模式选项。参数包括常用的成像技术、患者的辐射暴露、牙齿和周围面部骨骼的覆盖面积、可用性和成本效益。采访由两名操作员进行,以消除受试者的偏见。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS版本22,Armonk,NY:IBM Corp)对收集的Cbct数据进行分析。结果:44.2%的牙医认为锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)是最常用的成像方式,其次是正位体图(OPG)(17.9%)。21.9%的牙医更喜欢组合成像方式。12.3%的牙医开具了口内根尖周x线片(IOPA)处方,2.5%的牙医开具常规断层扫描处方。成像方式的精确性(51.2)减少了辐射暴露(19.8)和易用性(13%)是选择射线照片处方的原因。结论:根据这项研究,锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)是最常见的成像方式,其次是OPG。精确的测量被认为是选择放射技术的主要原因,其次是患者较少暴露于辐射,并且该方式易于使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radiographic Prescription Practices Among Implant Practitioners In India: A Cross-sectional Survey
Aim: To identify the contemporary radiographic prescription practices among the dental implant practitioners in India. Materials and method: Two clinicians interviewed four hundred dentists using a 13-question questionnaire for commonly prescribed imaging modality options for implant treatment planning and assessment. The parameters included commonly available imaging techniques, exposure of radiation to the patient, coverage area of teeth and surrounding facial bones, ease of availability and the cost effectiveness. The interview was conducted by two operators to eliminate subject bias. CbctThe data collected was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS version 22, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Results: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was found to be the most prescribed imaging modality prescribed by 44.2% of the dentists followed by orthopantograph (OPG) (17.9%). A combination of imaging modalities was preferred by 21.9% of dentists. The intraoral periapical radiographs (IOPA) were prescribed by 12.3% while conventional tomography was prescribed by 2.5% of the dentists. Precision of the imaging modality (51.2) reduced exposure to radiation (19.8) and ease of availability (13%) were the reasons for selection of radiograph prescription. Conclusion: According to the study, cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) appeared as the most prescribed imaging modality followed by OPG. Precise measurements were cited as the main reason for selecting a radiographic technique followed by the less exposure of the patient to radiation and easy availability of the modality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the Stress Analysis To Obtain The Tensile Properties of Three Type-1 and Type-3 Collagen Membranes Clinical Dentistry and Oral Cancer Screening A Systematic Review of The Relationship Between Parental Stress and Early Childhood Caries Melanotic Neuroectodermal Tumor of Infancy: A Rare Case Report and Review Exploring Periodontics specialty: A Vision for the Future (Opinion)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1