肾部分切除患者合并围手术期失血的肾块复杂性发生率。

Haris Jameel, Mehnaz Jabeen, Rabeea Saleem, Pardeep Kumar, A. S. Hassan
{"title":"肾部分切除患者合并围手术期失血的肾块复杂性发生率。","authors":"Haris Jameel, Mehnaz Jabeen, Rabeea Saleem, Pardeep Kumar, A. S. Hassan","doi":"10.29052/ijehsr.v10.i3.2022.349-354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Partial nephrectomy has emerged as a standard treatment for managing small renal masses. RENAL Nephrometry score (RNS) is a widely used tool for assessing tumors, minimizing bias, and improving clinical outcomes. This study aimed to determine the frequency of various renal mass complexities based on the RENAL nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy and to compare the mean blood loss in these patients. Methodology: The cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Urology, Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi- Pakistan. Perioperative blood loss after partial nephrectomy was observed in all cases, and patients had their RENAL nephrometry score determined before surgery. The patient's baseline demographic data, including age, gender, and body mass index (BMI), was recorded using a pre-designed Proforma. Results: According to the RNS, there were 33(52.4%) patients with moderate complexity, followed by 19(30.25%) and 11(17.4%) who had severe and mild complexity, respectively. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the mean blood loss among the three groups (p=0.025). Among the cofounders, age, BMI, and male gender significantly affected mean blood loss in different RNS groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: There was a high frequency of moderate renal complexity among the studied patients based on the RNS. A significant difference in the mean blood loss was observed among the patients with mild, moderate, and severe complexity.","PeriodicalId":34196,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency of renal mass complexities among patients undergoing partial nephrectomy associated with perioperative blood loss.\",\"authors\":\"Haris Jameel, Mehnaz Jabeen, Rabeea Saleem, Pardeep Kumar, A. S. Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.29052/ijehsr.v10.i3.2022.349-354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Partial nephrectomy has emerged as a standard treatment for managing small renal masses. RENAL Nephrometry score (RNS) is a widely used tool for assessing tumors, minimizing bias, and improving clinical outcomes. This study aimed to determine the frequency of various renal mass complexities based on the RENAL nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy and to compare the mean blood loss in these patients. Methodology: The cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Urology, Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi- Pakistan. Perioperative blood loss after partial nephrectomy was observed in all cases, and patients had their RENAL nephrometry score determined before surgery. The patient's baseline demographic data, including age, gender, and body mass index (BMI), was recorded using a pre-designed Proforma. Results: According to the RNS, there were 33(52.4%) patients with moderate complexity, followed by 19(30.25%) and 11(17.4%) who had severe and mild complexity, respectively. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the mean blood loss among the three groups (p=0.025). Among the cofounders, age, BMI, and male gender significantly affected mean blood loss in different RNS groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: There was a high frequency of moderate renal complexity among the studied patients based on the RNS. A significant difference in the mean blood loss was observed among the patients with mild, moderate, and severe complexity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29052/ijehsr.v10.i3.2022.349-354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29052/ijehsr.v10.i3.2022.349-354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾部分切除术已成为治疗小肾脏肿块的标准治疗方法。肾肾功能测定评分(RNS)是一种广泛用于评估肿瘤、最大限度地减少偏差和改善临床结果的工具。本研究旨在根据肾功能测量评分确定接受部分肾切除术的患者中各种肾脏肿块复杂性的发生频率,并比较这些患者的平均失血量。方法:横断面研究在巴基斯坦卡拉奇信德省泌尿外科与移植研究所泌尿外科进行。在所有病例中观察到部分肾切除术后的围手术期出血,患者在手术前测定了肾肾测量评分。使用预先设计的形式表记录患者的基线人口统计数据,包括年龄、性别和体重指数(BMI)。结果:根据RNS,有33名(52.4%)患者具有中度复杂性,其次是19名(30.25%)和11名(17.4%)患者分别具有重度和轻度复杂性。此外,三组的平均失血量存在显著差异(p=0.025)。在共同创始人中,年龄、BMI和男性显著影响不同RNS组的平均出血量(p<0.05)。轻度、中度和重度复杂性患者的平均失血量存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Frequency of renal mass complexities among patients undergoing partial nephrectomy associated with perioperative blood loss.
Background: Partial nephrectomy has emerged as a standard treatment for managing small renal masses. RENAL Nephrometry score (RNS) is a widely used tool for assessing tumors, minimizing bias, and improving clinical outcomes. This study aimed to determine the frequency of various renal mass complexities based on the RENAL nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy and to compare the mean blood loss in these patients. Methodology: The cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Urology, Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi- Pakistan. Perioperative blood loss after partial nephrectomy was observed in all cases, and patients had their RENAL nephrometry score determined before surgery. The patient's baseline demographic data, including age, gender, and body mass index (BMI), was recorded using a pre-designed Proforma. Results: According to the RNS, there were 33(52.4%) patients with moderate complexity, followed by 19(30.25%) and 11(17.4%) who had severe and mild complexity, respectively. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the mean blood loss among the three groups (p=0.025). Among the cofounders, age, BMI, and male gender significantly affected mean blood loss in different RNS groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: There was a high frequency of moderate renal complexity among the studied patients based on the RNS. A significant difference in the mean blood loss was observed among the patients with mild, moderate, and severe complexity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Non-Invasive Approaches in Interventional Cardiology for Addressing Cardiovascular Disease Burden in Low-Income Countries. A new chapter begins in the Journal of Health Science Research Burden of rifampicin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among apparently healthy students at the University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria Knowledge, attitude and practices of abattoir workers and veterinarians toward meat safety in abattoir or slaughter slabs within Uyo Metropolis, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria Variations in antioxidant status in ischemic stroke: A case control study in Indian population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1