无氧代谢指标作为埃及人群感染性休克复苏努力和死亡率效益的指导

IF 0.3 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2020-06-02 DOI:10.1097/EJ9.0000000000000002
Walid K. M. Ahmed, Ramy Mohamed El Sayed Ibrahim Kishk, D. Ragab, M. Desouky
{"title":"无氧代谢指标作为埃及人群感染性休克复苏努力和死亡率效益的指导","authors":"Walid K. M. Ahmed, Ramy Mohamed El Sayed Ibrahim Kishk, D. Ragab, M. Desouky","doi":"10.1097/EJ9.0000000000000002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide pressure and ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in arterial-venous oxygen content might be relevant in septic shock management. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether carbon dioxide gap and ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in oxygen content following septic shock resuscitation could predict mortality. Methods: Fifty septic shock patients were included in this study. Arterial and central venous blood gas samples were measured before and 6hours following fluid resuscitation and vasopressors. Results:Our study population was 61.6±7.4 years (31males). Thirty-three patients survived. Paired comparisons in nonsurvivors showed worsening hemodynamics, carbon dioxide gap, ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in oxygen content, and lactate clearance. Mortality prediction cutoffs for lactate (40mg/dl) with sensitivity (88.2%) and specificity (78.8%), carbon dioxide gap (6 mmHg) with sensitivity (94.1%) and specificity (63.6%) and ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in oxygen content (1.6) with sensitivity (88.2%) and specificity (60.6%). Combined lactate and the ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in oxygen content had sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 93.9%. Combined lactate and carbon dioxide gap had sensitivity of 82.4% and specificity of 90.9%. Discussion: Changes in carbon dioxide gap and ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in arterial-venous oxygen content during resuscitation of septic shock were related to in-hospital mortality. Adding carbon dioxide gap and the ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in arterial-venous oxygen content to lactate increased the accuracy of mortality prediction.","PeriodicalId":31233,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anaerobic Metabolism Markers as a Guide of Resuscitation Effort and Mortality Benefit in Septic Shock Among Egyptian Population\",\"authors\":\"Walid K. M. Ahmed, Ramy Mohamed El Sayed Ibrahim Kishk, D. Ragab, M. Desouky\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJ9.0000000000000002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide pressure and ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in arterial-venous oxygen content might be relevant in septic shock management. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether carbon dioxide gap and ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in oxygen content following septic shock resuscitation could predict mortality. Methods: Fifty septic shock patients were included in this study. Arterial and central venous blood gas samples were measured before and 6hours following fluid resuscitation and vasopressors. Results:Our study population was 61.6±7.4 years (31males). Thirty-three patients survived. Paired comparisons in nonsurvivors showed worsening hemodynamics, carbon dioxide gap, ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in oxygen content, and lactate clearance. Mortality prediction cutoffs for lactate (40mg/dl) with sensitivity (88.2%) and specificity (78.8%), carbon dioxide gap (6 mmHg) with sensitivity (94.1%) and specificity (63.6%) and ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in oxygen content (1.6) with sensitivity (88.2%) and specificity (60.6%). Combined lactate and the ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in oxygen content had sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 93.9%. Combined lactate and carbon dioxide gap had sensitivity of 82.4% and specificity of 90.9%. Discussion: Changes in carbon dioxide gap and ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in arterial-venous oxygen content during resuscitation of septic shock were related to in-hospital mortality. Adding carbon dioxide gap and the ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in arterial-venous oxygen content to lactate increased the accuracy of mortality prediction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJ9.0000000000000002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJ9.0000000000000002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

导读:静脉-动脉二氧化碳压和二氧化碳间隙比除以动-静脉氧含量差异可能与脓毒性休克的治疗有关。本研究的目的是评估脓毒性休克复苏后二氧化碳间隙和二氧化碳间隙除以氧含量差异的比值是否可以预测死亡率。方法:对50例感染性休克患者进行分析。分别在液体复苏和使用血管加压剂前和后6小时测量动脉和中心静脉血气。结果:研究人群年龄61.6±7.4岁,男性31人。33名患者存活。非幸存者的配对比较显示血流动力学、二氧化碳间隙、二氧化碳间隙除以氧含量差异的比率和乳酸清除率恶化。乳酸(40mg/dl)的死亡率预测截止值敏感性(88.2%)和特异性(78.8%),二氧化碳间隙(6 mmHg)的死亡率预测截止值敏感性(94.1%)和特异性(63.6%),二氧化碳间隙除以氧含量差(1.6)的死亡率预测截止值敏感性(88.2%)和特异性(60.6%)。乳酸与二氧化碳间隙比值除以氧含量差异的联合检测灵敏度为88.2%,特异度为93.9%。乳酸和二氧化碳联合间隙的敏感性为82.4%,特异性为90.9%。讨论:脓毒性休克复苏过程中二氧化碳间隙的变化及二氧化碳间隙除以动静脉氧含量差的比值与院内死亡率有关。增加二氧化碳间隙和二氧化碳间隙除以动静脉氧含量与乳酸含量之差的比值提高了死亡率预测的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anaerobic Metabolism Markers as a Guide of Resuscitation Effort and Mortality Benefit in Septic Shock Among Egyptian Population
Introduction: Venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide pressure and ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in arterial-venous oxygen content might be relevant in septic shock management. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether carbon dioxide gap and ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in oxygen content following septic shock resuscitation could predict mortality. Methods: Fifty septic shock patients were included in this study. Arterial and central venous blood gas samples were measured before and 6hours following fluid resuscitation and vasopressors. Results:Our study population was 61.6±7.4 years (31males). Thirty-three patients survived. Paired comparisons in nonsurvivors showed worsening hemodynamics, carbon dioxide gap, ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in oxygen content, and lactate clearance. Mortality prediction cutoffs for lactate (40mg/dl) with sensitivity (88.2%) and specificity (78.8%), carbon dioxide gap (6 mmHg) with sensitivity (94.1%) and specificity (63.6%) and ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in oxygen content (1.6) with sensitivity (88.2%) and specificity (60.6%). Combined lactate and the ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in oxygen content had sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 93.9%. Combined lactate and carbon dioxide gap had sensitivity of 82.4% and specificity of 90.9%. Discussion: Changes in carbon dioxide gap and ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in arterial-venous oxygen content during resuscitation of septic shock were related to in-hospital mortality. Adding carbon dioxide gap and the ratio of carbon dioxide gap divided by difference in arterial-venous oxygen content to lactate increased the accuracy of mortality prediction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
42 weeks
期刊介绍: The Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine is the official Journal of the Egyptian College of Critical Care Physicians, the most authoritative organization of Egyptian physicians involved in the multi-professional field of critical care medicine. The journal is intended to provide a peer-reviewed source for multidisciplinary coverage of general acute and intensive care medicine and its various subcategories including cardiac, pulmonary, neuro, renal as well as post-operative care. The journal is proud to have an international multi-professional editorial board in the broad field of critical care that will assist in publishing promising research and breakthrough reports that lead to better patients care in life threatening conditions, and bring the reader a quick access to the latest diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in monitoring and management of critically ill patients.
期刊最新文献
Choosing Between Enoxaparin and Fondaparinux for the Prevention of Thromboembolism: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Multiple Rib Fractures Management in a Tertiary Trauma Center: A Retrospective Observational Study Anterior Abdominal Wall Ecchymosis in COVID-19 Patient Following Enoxaparin Use Diaphragmatic Function Assessment Using Chest Ultrasonography as a Predictor for Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation Anaerobic Metabolism Markers as a Guide of Resuscitation Effort and Mortality Benefit in Septic Shock Among Egyptian Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1