克氏综合征男性与非临床对照的心智化和认知能力

K.W. Fjermestad , N. Bergh , S.K. Fleten , R.J. Huster , C. Gravholt , A.-K. Solbakk
{"title":"克氏综合征男性与非临床对照的心智化和认知能力","authors":"K.W. Fjermestad ,&nbsp;N. Bergh ,&nbsp;S.K. Fleten ,&nbsp;R.J. Huster ,&nbsp;C. Gravholt ,&nbsp;A.-K. Solbakk","doi":"10.1016/j.psycom.2023.100116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigated cognition and mentalization skills, defined as the ability to understand one's own and others' intentions and emotions, in men with Klinefelter Syndrome (KS). The sample was 26 men with KS and 26 non-clinical male controls aged 19–65 years. We measured mentalization with the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) and cognition with neuropsychological tests. The results showed that men with KS had significantly lower scores on the RMET compared to controls. However, the group difference was not significant when controlling for IQ. There were more significant correlations between cognitive domains and mentalization skills in the KS group than for controls. In regression models, cognitive domains explained up to 54% of the variance in mentalization skills for men with KS, compared to 15% for controls. The men with KS struggled particularly with interpreting neutral and negative emotional states relative to the control group. We conclude that men with KS exhibit mentalization difficulties, which are strongly linked to their cognitive abilities, and especially their deficits in verbal learning. Interventions aimed at enhancing language and other neuropsychological functions, as well as mentalization skills, are warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74595,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry research communications","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mentalization and cognitive skills in men with Klinefelter syndrome versus non-clinical controls\",\"authors\":\"K.W. Fjermestad ,&nbsp;N. Bergh ,&nbsp;S.K. Fleten ,&nbsp;R.J. Huster ,&nbsp;C. Gravholt ,&nbsp;A.-K. Solbakk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psycom.2023.100116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We investigated cognition and mentalization skills, defined as the ability to understand one's own and others' intentions and emotions, in men with Klinefelter Syndrome (KS). The sample was 26 men with KS and 26 non-clinical male controls aged 19–65 years. We measured mentalization with the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) and cognition with neuropsychological tests. The results showed that men with KS had significantly lower scores on the RMET compared to controls. However, the group difference was not significant when controlling for IQ. There were more significant correlations between cognitive domains and mentalization skills in the KS group than for controls. In regression models, cognitive domains explained up to 54% of the variance in mentalization skills for men with KS, compared to 15% for controls. The men with KS struggled particularly with interpreting neutral and negative emotional states relative to the control group. We conclude that men with KS exhibit mentalization difficulties, which are strongly linked to their cognitive abilities, and especially their deficits in verbal learning. Interventions aimed at enhancing language and other neuropsychological functions, as well as mentalization skills, are warranted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry research communications\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry research communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598723000156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598723000156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们调查了患有Klinefelter综合征(KS)的男性的认知和心理技能,定义为理解自己和他人意图和情绪的能力。样本为26名男性KS和26名非临床男性对照,年龄19-65岁。我们用眼睛读心术测试(RMET)和神经心理学测试来测量心智化和认知。结果显示,与对照组相比,患有KS的男性在RMET上的得分明显较低。然而,当控制智商时,组间差异不显著。与对照组相比,KS组的认知领域和心智化技能之间存在更显著的相关性。在回归模型中,认知领域解释了KS男性心智化技能差异的54%,而对照组为15%。与对照组相比,患有KS的男性在解释中性和消极情绪状态方面尤其困难。我们的结论是,患有KS的男性表现出心智障碍,这与他们的认知能力密切相关,尤其是他们在语言学习方面的缺陷。干预旨在提高语言和其他神经心理功能,以及心理技能,是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mentalization and cognitive skills in men with Klinefelter syndrome versus non-clinical controls

We investigated cognition and mentalization skills, defined as the ability to understand one's own and others' intentions and emotions, in men with Klinefelter Syndrome (KS). The sample was 26 men with KS and 26 non-clinical male controls aged 19–65 years. We measured mentalization with the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) and cognition with neuropsychological tests. The results showed that men with KS had significantly lower scores on the RMET compared to controls. However, the group difference was not significant when controlling for IQ. There were more significant correlations between cognitive domains and mentalization skills in the KS group than for controls. In regression models, cognitive domains explained up to 54% of the variance in mentalization skills for men with KS, compared to 15% for controls. The men with KS struggled particularly with interpreting neutral and negative emotional states relative to the control group. We conclude that men with KS exhibit mentalization difficulties, which are strongly linked to their cognitive abilities, and especially their deficits in verbal learning. Interventions aimed at enhancing language and other neuropsychological functions, as well as mentalization skills, are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry research communications
Psychiatry research communications Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
期刊最新文献
An investigation into the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and food addiction: The role of urgency and emotion dysregulation Factors related to painful somatic symptoms in patients with depression: The role of gender and anhedonia rtfMRI neurofeedback interventions are not cost prohibitive The impact of childhood sexual, physical and emotional abuse and neglect on suicidal behavior and non-suicidal self-injury: A systematic review of meta-analyses Convergent and predictive validity of the Mini MoCA and considerations for use among older adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1