内在的非/非人:超越生命政治的宫内想象

Q3 Social Sciences Studies in Gender and Sexuality Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/15240657.2021.1961494
P. Mccloskey
{"title":"内在的非/非人:超越生命政治的宫内想象","authors":"P. Mccloskey","doi":"10.1080/15240657.2021.1961494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the context of the increasingly entangled, devastating markers of this time (climate crises, unfettered capitalism, tribal nationalism, increasing borders, species extinction), this article stakes a claim for the importance of attending to the human intrauterine as a way to connect with non/inhuman alterity. It is argued that the intrauterine phenomenon, as a process experienced by all humans, has a part to play in understanding “humanness,” human connectedness to nonhumanness, which can be used as part of a wider strategy to reimagine collaboratively and with co-response-ability ways to live and survive within multispecies landscapes. Methodologically, Karen Barad’s diffractive approach is used to explore the intrauterine as a time–space of affect and connection between the human and nonhuman. With this approach, the article assembles selected philosophers, alongside a rereading of Mary Kelly’s Antepartum (1973) in the proposal of an intrauterine imaginary unhitched from the biopolitical. In doing so, it seeks to redraw some of the boundaries around the intrauterine imaginary, to propose how paying attention to the non/inhuman of the human intrauterine might generate images and ideas of connections and co-response-ability beyond birth, between humans and more than humans. When I say “Alice becomes larger,” I mean that she becomes larger than she was. By the same token, however, she becomes smaller than she is now. Certainly, she is not bigger and smaller at the same time. She is larger now; she was smaller before. But it is at the same moment that one becomes larger than one was and smaller than one becomes. This is the simultaneity of a becoming whose characteristic is to elude the present. (Deleuze, 2004, p. 3)","PeriodicalId":39339,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Gender and Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Non/Inhuman Within: Beyond the Biopolitical Intrauterine Imaginary\",\"authors\":\"P. Mccloskey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15240657.2021.1961494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In the context of the increasingly entangled, devastating markers of this time (climate crises, unfettered capitalism, tribal nationalism, increasing borders, species extinction), this article stakes a claim for the importance of attending to the human intrauterine as a way to connect with non/inhuman alterity. It is argued that the intrauterine phenomenon, as a process experienced by all humans, has a part to play in understanding “humanness,” human connectedness to nonhumanness, which can be used as part of a wider strategy to reimagine collaboratively and with co-response-ability ways to live and survive within multispecies landscapes. Methodologically, Karen Barad’s diffractive approach is used to explore the intrauterine as a time–space of affect and connection between the human and nonhuman. With this approach, the article assembles selected philosophers, alongside a rereading of Mary Kelly’s Antepartum (1973) in the proposal of an intrauterine imaginary unhitched from the biopolitical. In doing so, it seeks to redraw some of the boundaries around the intrauterine imaginary, to propose how paying attention to the non/inhuman of the human intrauterine might generate images and ideas of connections and co-response-ability beyond birth, between humans and more than humans. When I say “Alice becomes larger,” I mean that she becomes larger than she was. By the same token, however, she becomes smaller than she is now. Certainly, she is not bigger and smaller at the same time. She is larger now; she was smaller before. But it is at the same moment that one becomes larger than one was and smaller than one becomes. This is the simultaneity of a becoming whose characteristic is to elude the present. (Deleuze, 2004, p. 3)\",\"PeriodicalId\":39339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Gender and Sexuality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Gender and Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15240657.2021.1961494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Gender and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15240657.2021.1961494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在这个时代日益纠缠、毁灭性的标志物(气候危机、不受约束的资本主义、部落民族主义、日益增加的边界、物种灭绝)的背景下,本文主张关注人类宫内环境的重要性,将其作为一种与非人道/非人道的争吵联系起来的方式。有人认为,宫内现象作为所有人类都经历过的一个过程,在理解“人性”、人类与非人性的联系方面发挥着作用,这可以作为更广泛战略的一部分,重新构想协作和具有共同反应能力的方式,在多物种景观中生活和生存。在方法上,Karen Barad的衍射方法被用于探索宫内作为人类和非人类之间情感和联系的时间空间。通过这种方法,这篇文章汇集了选定的哲学家,同时重读了玛丽·凯利的《产前》(1973年),提出了一个脱离生物政治的宫内想象。在这样做的过程中,它试图重新划定子宫内想象的一些界限,提出关注人类子宫内的非人道性可能会产生人类与更多人类之间出生后的联系和共同反应能力的图像和想法。当我说“爱丽丝变大了”时,我的意思是她变得比以前更大了。然而,出于同样的原因,她变得比现在更小了。当然,她并不是同时变得越来越大和越来越小。她现在更大了;她以前比较小。但就在同一时刻,一个人变得比过去更大,比现在更小。这是一个以逃避当下为特征的成为的同时性。(德勒兹,2004年,第3页)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Non/Inhuman Within: Beyond the Biopolitical Intrauterine Imaginary
ABSTRACT In the context of the increasingly entangled, devastating markers of this time (climate crises, unfettered capitalism, tribal nationalism, increasing borders, species extinction), this article stakes a claim for the importance of attending to the human intrauterine as a way to connect with non/inhuman alterity. It is argued that the intrauterine phenomenon, as a process experienced by all humans, has a part to play in understanding “humanness,” human connectedness to nonhumanness, which can be used as part of a wider strategy to reimagine collaboratively and with co-response-ability ways to live and survive within multispecies landscapes. Methodologically, Karen Barad’s diffractive approach is used to explore the intrauterine as a time–space of affect and connection between the human and nonhuman. With this approach, the article assembles selected philosophers, alongside a rereading of Mary Kelly’s Antepartum (1973) in the proposal of an intrauterine imaginary unhitched from the biopolitical. In doing so, it seeks to redraw some of the boundaries around the intrauterine imaginary, to propose how paying attention to the non/inhuman of the human intrauterine might generate images and ideas of connections and co-response-ability beyond birth, between humans and more than humans. When I say “Alice becomes larger,” I mean that she becomes larger than she was. By the same token, however, she becomes smaller than she is now. Certainly, she is not bigger and smaller at the same time. She is larger now; she was smaller before. But it is at the same moment that one becomes larger than one was and smaller than one becomes. This is the simultaneity of a becoming whose characteristic is to elude the present. (Deleuze, 2004, p. 3)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Gender and Sexuality
Studies in Gender and Sexuality Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Beginning in the final two decades of the 20th century, the study of gender and sexuality has been revived from a variety of directions: the traditions of feminist scholarship, postclassical and postmodern psychoanalytic theory, developmental research, and cultural studies have all contributed to renewed fascination with those powerfully formative aspects of subjectivity that fall within the rubric of "gender" and "sexuality." Clinicians, for their part, have returned to gender and sexuality with heightened sensitivity to the role of these constructs in the treatment situation, including the richly variegated ways in which assumptions about gender and sexuality enter into our understandings of "normality" and "pathology."
期刊最新文献
“Everything Arrives Energetically, at First” Assimilation and Transgression: Doing Trans* Activism in Indonesia and Iran Trans* Activism in Indonesia and Iran: Working Against Misrecognition and Enhancing the Intelligibility of Trans* Subjectivities The Anxiety to Know: Producing Trans as a “Sensitive” Issue in LGBTIQ+ Diversity Training Cis Pathology: Psychoanalysis of Cisgender
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1