导航不确定性:勒吉恩、戈罗迪舍尔和杰米辛的模糊乌托邦

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Utopian Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.5325/utopianstudies.33.1.0107
J. Bartles
{"title":"导航不确定性:勒吉恩、戈罗迪舍尔和杰米辛的模糊乌托邦","authors":"J. Bartles","doi":"10.5325/utopianstudies.33.1.0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The phrase \"ambiguous utopia\" was coined by Ursula K. Le Guin in the subtitle of her novel, The Dispossessed: An Ambiguous Utopia (1974). That work appeared when utopian narratives had been displaced by dystopian imaginaries. This article embarks on a comparative analysis of three short stories: Ursula K. Le Guin's \"The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas\" (1973), Angélica Gorodischer's \"Of Navigators\" (1979), and N. K. Jemisin's \"The Ones Who Stay and Fight\" (2018). Each author installs ambiguity at the center of their open-ended utopian imaginaries as a way to challenge dogma, pessimism, and complacency. Le Guin interrogates the boundary between belief and knowledge to hold the threat of authoritarianism at bay. Gorodischer, a friend and contemporary of Le Guin, is considered a central figure of Argentine science fiction and fantasy. Her story imagines the discovery of a second Earth set in 1492 and highlights the need for utopianism to challenge the legacy of colonization. Finally, Jemisin's story is a critical homage to \"Omelas.\" Jemisin shares the decolonial impetus of Gorodischer's fiction, and she constructs Um-Helat on an explicitly antiracist foundation. Instead of walking away, her characters actively fight the creeping threat of intolerance while working toward that better place.","PeriodicalId":44751,"journal":{"name":"Utopian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating Uncertainty: The Ambiguous Utopias of Le Guin, Gorodischer, and Jemisin\",\"authors\":\"J. Bartles\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/utopianstudies.33.1.0107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:The phrase \\\"ambiguous utopia\\\" was coined by Ursula K. Le Guin in the subtitle of her novel, The Dispossessed: An Ambiguous Utopia (1974). That work appeared when utopian narratives had been displaced by dystopian imaginaries. This article embarks on a comparative analysis of three short stories: Ursula K. Le Guin's \\\"The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas\\\" (1973), Angélica Gorodischer's \\\"Of Navigators\\\" (1979), and N. K. Jemisin's \\\"The Ones Who Stay and Fight\\\" (2018). Each author installs ambiguity at the center of their open-ended utopian imaginaries as a way to challenge dogma, pessimism, and complacency. Le Guin interrogates the boundary between belief and knowledge to hold the threat of authoritarianism at bay. Gorodischer, a friend and contemporary of Le Guin, is considered a central figure of Argentine science fiction and fantasy. Her story imagines the discovery of a second Earth set in 1492 and highlights the need for utopianism to challenge the legacy of colonization. Finally, Jemisin's story is a critical homage to \\\"Omelas.\\\" Jemisin shares the decolonial impetus of Gorodischer's fiction, and she constructs Um-Helat on an explicitly antiracist foundation. Instead of walking away, her characters actively fight the creeping threat of intolerance while working toward that better place.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utopian Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utopian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/utopianstudies.33.1.0107\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utopian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/utopianstudies.33.1.0107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“模棱两可的乌托邦”一词是厄休拉·勒奎恩在其小说《被剥夺者:一个模棱两可的乌托邦》(1974)的副标题中创造的。这部作品出现时,乌托邦叙事已经被反乌托邦的想象所取代。本文对厄休拉·勒奎恩的《离开欧美拉斯的人》(1973)、angsamicica Gorodischer的《航海家》(1979)和n·k·杰米辛的《留下来战斗的人》(2018)这三篇短篇小说进行了比较分析。每位作者都将模棱两可置于其开放式乌托邦想象的中心,作为挑战教条、悲观和自满的一种方式。勒奎恩质疑信仰和知识之间的界限,以遏制威权主义的威胁。戈罗迪舍是勒奎恩的朋友,也是同时代的人,被认为是阿根廷科幻小说和奇幻小说的核心人物。她的故事以1492年为背景,想象了第二个地球的发现,并强调了乌托邦主义挑战殖民遗产的必要性。最后,杰米辛的故事是对“欧美拉斯”的重要致敬。杰米辛分享了戈罗迪舍小说的非殖民化动力,她在明确的反种族主义基础上构建了Um-Helat。她的角色没有走开,而是积极地与不宽容的威胁作斗争,同时朝着更美好的地方努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Navigating Uncertainty: The Ambiguous Utopias of Le Guin, Gorodischer, and Jemisin
abstract:The phrase "ambiguous utopia" was coined by Ursula K. Le Guin in the subtitle of her novel, The Dispossessed: An Ambiguous Utopia (1974). That work appeared when utopian narratives had been displaced by dystopian imaginaries. This article embarks on a comparative analysis of three short stories: Ursula K. Le Guin's "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas" (1973), Angélica Gorodischer's "Of Navigators" (1979), and N. K. Jemisin's "The Ones Who Stay and Fight" (2018). Each author installs ambiguity at the center of their open-ended utopian imaginaries as a way to challenge dogma, pessimism, and complacency. Le Guin interrogates the boundary between belief and knowledge to hold the threat of authoritarianism at bay. Gorodischer, a friend and contemporary of Le Guin, is considered a central figure of Argentine science fiction and fantasy. Her story imagines the discovery of a second Earth set in 1492 and highlights the need for utopianism to challenge the legacy of colonization. Finally, Jemisin's story is a critical homage to "Omelas." Jemisin shares the decolonial impetus of Gorodischer's fiction, and she constructs Um-Helat on an explicitly antiracist foundation. Instead of walking away, her characters actively fight the creeping threat of intolerance while working toward that better place.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Utopian Studies
Utopian Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
The Future of the Book: Images of Reading in the American Utopian Novel Response 2: “Pessimism of the Intellect, Optimism of the Will” Indian Science Fiction: Patterns, History and Hybridity The Past and Future of Utopian Studies Response 1: Acting Up in Utopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1