不可思议的滑动驱动:约会软件算法思维的种族主义模式的回归

Q3 Social Sciences Studies in Gender and Sexuality Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/15240657.2021.1961498
Gregory Narr
{"title":"不可思议的滑动驱动:约会软件算法思维的种族主义模式的回归","authors":"Gregory Narr","doi":"10.1080/15240657.2021.1961498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As algorithmic media amplify long-standing social oppression, they also seek to colonize every last bit of sociality where that oppression could be resisted. Swipe apps constitute prototypical examples of this dynamic. By employing protocols that foster absentminded engagement, they allow unconscious racial preferences to be expressed without troubling users’ perceptions of themselves as nonracist. These preferences are then measured by recommender systems that treat “attractiveness” as a zero-sum game, allocate affective flows according to the winners and losers of those games, and ultimately amplify the salience of race as a factor of success for finding intimacy. In thus priming users to disassociate their behaviors from troubling networked effects, swipe apps recursively couple their unconscious biases with biased outcomes in a pernicious feedback loop. To resist this ideological severing of the personal from the networked, this article analyzes interviews from 50 online daters through a lens formulated as the “uncanny user unconscious.” This lens allows for the affective registration of abhorrent modes of distributed thoughts disavowed by the very users they are created from and coupled with. It may thus afford those seeking more ethical protocols of engagement some purchase on the all too familiar biases some algorithms both amplify and repress.","PeriodicalId":39339,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Gender and Sexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Uncanny Swipe Drive: The Return of a Racist Mode of Algorithmic Thought on Dating Apps\",\"authors\":\"Gregory Narr\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15240657.2021.1961498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT As algorithmic media amplify long-standing social oppression, they also seek to colonize every last bit of sociality where that oppression could be resisted. Swipe apps constitute prototypical examples of this dynamic. By employing protocols that foster absentminded engagement, they allow unconscious racial preferences to be expressed without troubling users’ perceptions of themselves as nonracist. These preferences are then measured by recommender systems that treat “attractiveness” as a zero-sum game, allocate affective flows according to the winners and losers of those games, and ultimately amplify the salience of race as a factor of success for finding intimacy. In thus priming users to disassociate their behaviors from troubling networked effects, swipe apps recursively couple their unconscious biases with biased outcomes in a pernicious feedback loop. To resist this ideological severing of the personal from the networked, this article analyzes interviews from 50 online daters through a lens formulated as the “uncanny user unconscious.” This lens allows for the affective registration of abhorrent modes of distributed thoughts disavowed by the very users they are created from and coupled with. It may thus afford those seeking more ethical protocols of engagement some purchase on the all too familiar biases some algorithms both amplify and repress.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Gender and Sexuality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Gender and Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15240657.2021.1961498\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Gender and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15240657.2021.1961498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

随着算法媒体放大长期存在的社会压迫,它们也试图殖民社会中每一个可以抵抗压迫的地方。刷屏应用就是这种动态的典型例子。通过采用促进心不在焉参与的协议,他们允许无意识的种族偏好表达,而不会打扰用户认为自己是非种族主义者。然后,这些偏好被推荐系统衡量,该系统将“吸引力”视为零和游戏,根据这些游戏的赢家和输家分配情感流,并最终放大种族作为成功寻找亲密关系的一个因素的重要性。在引导用户将自己的行为与令人不安的网络效应分离的过程中,刷屏应用递归地将他们的无意识偏见与有偏见的结果结合在一起,形成了一个有害的反馈循环。为了抵制这种个人与网络的意识形态割裂,本文通过“不可思议的用户无意识”的视角分析了50位在线约会者的访谈。这个镜头允许对令人厌恶的分布式思维模式进行情感登记,这些模式被创造它们的用户所否认,并与之结合。因此,它可能会让那些寻求更合乎道德的参与协议的人,在某些算法放大和抑制的过于熟悉的偏见上得到一些支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Uncanny Swipe Drive: The Return of a Racist Mode of Algorithmic Thought on Dating Apps
ABSTRACT As algorithmic media amplify long-standing social oppression, they also seek to colonize every last bit of sociality where that oppression could be resisted. Swipe apps constitute prototypical examples of this dynamic. By employing protocols that foster absentminded engagement, they allow unconscious racial preferences to be expressed without troubling users’ perceptions of themselves as nonracist. These preferences are then measured by recommender systems that treat “attractiveness” as a zero-sum game, allocate affective flows according to the winners and losers of those games, and ultimately amplify the salience of race as a factor of success for finding intimacy. In thus priming users to disassociate their behaviors from troubling networked effects, swipe apps recursively couple their unconscious biases with biased outcomes in a pernicious feedback loop. To resist this ideological severing of the personal from the networked, this article analyzes interviews from 50 online daters through a lens formulated as the “uncanny user unconscious.” This lens allows for the affective registration of abhorrent modes of distributed thoughts disavowed by the very users they are created from and coupled with. It may thus afford those seeking more ethical protocols of engagement some purchase on the all too familiar biases some algorithms both amplify and repress.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Gender and Sexuality
Studies in Gender and Sexuality Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Beginning in the final two decades of the 20th century, the study of gender and sexuality has been revived from a variety of directions: the traditions of feminist scholarship, postclassical and postmodern psychoanalytic theory, developmental research, and cultural studies have all contributed to renewed fascination with those powerfully formative aspects of subjectivity that fall within the rubric of "gender" and "sexuality." Clinicians, for their part, have returned to gender and sexuality with heightened sensitivity to the role of these constructs in the treatment situation, including the richly variegated ways in which assumptions about gender and sexuality enter into our understandings of "normality" and "pathology."
期刊最新文献
“Everything Arrives Energetically, at First” Assimilation and Transgression: Doing Trans* Activism in Indonesia and Iran Trans* Activism in Indonesia and Iran: Working Against Misrecognition and Enhancing the Intelligibility of Trans* Subjectivities The Anxiety to Know: Producing Trans as a “Sensitive” Issue in LGBTIQ+ Diversity Training Cis Pathology: Psychoanalysis of Cisgender
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1