社论

Q2 Social Sciences Evaluation Journal of Australasia Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1177/1035719X211014398
Bronwyn Rossingh
{"title":"社论","authors":"Bronwyn Rossingh","doi":"10.1177/1035719X211014398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welcome to the June 2021 issue of the Evaluation Journal of Australasia (EJA) that brings a strong advocacy feel from the social justice and capacity-building perspectives. This dominant feature in the issue brings to light that social justice and capacity building are quite often the taken-for-granted aspects that do not receive the focus they warrant. Readers of this issue will find that in the papers presented, empowerment evaluation approaches remedy this situation when accountability and internal evaluation unite. Accountability is mapped through an organisation’s mission and vision and enacted by its leadership that then drives and dictates the performance of its functions in the best interests of those it serves. As the papers in this issue reveal, internal evaluation has inherent powers and potential for emancipatory and enabling outcomes that serve as an underlying source of empowerment to those that are impacted by the programmes being delivered. Fetterman (2005) provides relevant and useful support to further introduce the significant evaluative notions and sentiments of the papers in this issue. He refers to 10 guiding principles of empowerment evaluation that encourage and promote internal accountability and contends that these principles are sustainable and prevail even after external evaluators and funders have been and gone. These guiding principles of empowerment evaluation are as follows (Fetterman, 2005, pp. 43–50):","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"21 1","pages":"65 - 68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1035719X211014398","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial\",\"authors\":\"Bronwyn Rossingh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1035719X211014398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Welcome to the June 2021 issue of the Evaluation Journal of Australasia (EJA) that brings a strong advocacy feel from the social justice and capacity-building perspectives. This dominant feature in the issue brings to light that social justice and capacity building are quite often the taken-for-granted aspects that do not receive the focus they warrant. Readers of this issue will find that in the papers presented, empowerment evaluation approaches remedy this situation when accountability and internal evaluation unite. Accountability is mapped through an organisation’s mission and vision and enacted by its leadership that then drives and dictates the performance of its functions in the best interests of those it serves. As the papers in this issue reveal, internal evaluation has inherent powers and potential for emancipatory and enabling outcomes that serve as an underlying source of empowerment to those that are impacted by the programmes being delivered. Fetterman (2005) provides relevant and useful support to further introduce the significant evaluative notions and sentiments of the papers in this issue. He refers to 10 guiding principles of empowerment evaluation that encourage and promote internal accountability and contends that these principles are sustainable and prevail even after external evaluators and funders have been and gone. These guiding principles of empowerment evaluation are as follows (Fetterman, 2005, pp. 43–50):\",\"PeriodicalId\":37231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation Journal of Australasia\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"65 - 68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1035719X211014398\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation Journal of Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X211014398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X211014398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欢迎阅读2021年6月号的《澳大拉西亚评估杂志》(EJA),该杂志从社会正义和能力建设的角度带来了强烈的倡导感。这一问题的主要特点表明,社会正义和能力建设往往被认为是理所当然的方面,而没有得到应有的关注。本期的读者会发现,在提出的论文中,授权评估方法在问责制和内部评估相结合时纠正了这种情况。问责制是通过组织的使命和愿景来体现的,并由其领导层制定,然后由领导层推动和指示其职能的履行,以实现其服务对象的最大利益。正如本期的论文所揭示的那样,内部评价具有固有的力量和潜力,可以产生解放和有利的结果,作为对受所提供方案影响的人赋权的潜在来源。Fetterman(2005)为进一步介绍本期论文的重要评价理念和观点提供了相关且有益的支持。他提到了授权评估的10项指导原则,这些原则鼓励和促进内部问责制,并认为这些原则是可持续的,即使在外部评估人员和资助者离开之后也会占上风。这些授权评估的指导原则如下(Fetterman, 2005, pp. 43-50):
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial
Welcome to the June 2021 issue of the Evaluation Journal of Australasia (EJA) that brings a strong advocacy feel from the social justice and capacity-building perspectives. This dominant feature in the issue brings to light that social justice and capacity building are quite often the taken-for-granted aspects that do not receive the focus they warrant. Readers of this issue will find that in the papers presented, empowerment evaluation approaches remedy this situation when accountability and internal evaluation unite. Accountability is mapped through an organisation’s mission and vision and enacted by its leadership that then drives and dictates the performance of its functions in the best interests of those it serves. As the papers in this issue reveal, internal evaluation has inherent powers and potential for emancipatory and enabling outcomes that serve as an underlying source of empowerment to those that are impacted by the programmes being delivered. Fetterman (2005) provides relevant and useful support to further introduce the significant evaluative notions and sentiments of the papers in this issue. He refers to 10 guiding principles of empowerment evaluation that encourage and promote internal accountability and contends that these principles are sustainable and prevail even after external evaluators and funders have been and gone. These guiding principles of empowerment evaluation are as follows (Fetterman, 2005, pp. 43–50):
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
Evaluation Journal of Australasia Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Utilising existing data for a pilot social return on investment analysis of the family wellbeing empowerment program: A justification and framework Evaluation at the cutting edge: Driving innovation and quality The best medicine: Lessons from health for policy randomistas Evaluator perspective: Meet an Australian Evaluation Society Fellow – Nan Wehipeihana Meta-evaluation: Validating program evaluation standards through the United Nations Evaluation Quality Assessment (EQAs)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1