智利刑法修正案情节可沟通性规则的历史渊源:那不勒斯法典和罗马法的背景

Z. Cortés, J. Luis
{"title":"智利刑法修正案情节可沟通性规则的历史渊源:那不勒斯法典和罗马法的背景","authors":"Z. Cortés, J. Luis","doi":"10.4067/s0716-54552020000100499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen La aplicacion literal del articulo 64 del Codigo Penal chileno, relevante en cuanto que establece reglas vinculadas con el pro blema de la comunicabilidad y por su rol como modelo de los recientes proyectos de reforma integral, justifica la pregunta por sus antecedentes historicos. Sus origenes se pueden rastrear finalmente hasta el derecho romano, pasando por el modelo habitual de la codificacion nacional (el Codigo espanol de 1848 reformado en 1850) y por la codificacion napolitana de 1819. La evolucion observada pone de manifiesto que el esfuerzo generalizador requirio de reglas que acojan tanto la incomunicabilidad como la comunicabilidad, para distintos supuestos, sin perjuicio de mostrar una vinculacion con hipotesis que hoy reciben un tratamiento especial y separado. EnglishAbstract A quest for the historical background of Article 64 of the Chilean Criminal Code (legal provision significant as it deals with the so-called problem of “communicability” and as a model for recent proposals of legal reform) is justified because it is interpreted based on the literal meaning of its wording. Its origins can be traced back eventually to Roman Law, through the usual model of the national legislation (the Spanish Code of 1848 as amended in 1850) and through the Neapolitan codification of 1819. This evolution underlines that the process of setting up regulations of a general nature required different rules applicable under different circumstances, respectively allowing and blocking the “communicability” effect. Furthermore, this quest shows how these origins are related to cases subject currently to a particular and different regulation.","PeriodicalId":35307,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Los orígenes históricos de las reglas sobre comunicabilidad de las circunstancias modificatorias del Código Penal chileno: antecedentes en la codificación napolitana y en el derecho romano\",\"authors\":\"Z. Cortés, J. Luis\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0716-54552020000100499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolResumen La aplicacion literal del articulo 64 del Codigo Penal chileno, relevante en cuanto que establece reglas vinculadas con el pro blema de la comunicabilidad y por su rol como modelo de los recientes proyectos de reforma integral, justifica la pregunta por sus antecedentes historicos. Sus origenes se pueden rastrear finalmente hasta el derecho romano, pasando por el modelo habitual de la codificacion nacional (el Codigo espanol de 1848 reformado en 1850) y por la codificacion napolitana de 1819. La evolucion observada pone de manifiesto que el esfuerzo generalizador requirio de reglas que acojan tanto la incomunicabilidad como la comunicabilidad, para distintos supuestos, sin perjuicio de mostrar una vinculacion con hipotesis que hoy reciben un tratamiento especial y separado. EnglishAbstract A quest for the historical background of Article 64 of the Chilean Criminal Code (legal provision significant as it deals with the so-called problem of “communicability” and as a model for recent proposals of legal reform) is justified because it is interpreted based on the literal meaning of its wording. Its origins can be traced back eventually to Roman Law, through the usual model of the national legislation (the Spanish Code of 1848 as amended in 1850) and through the Neapolitan codification of 1819. This evolution underlines that the process of setting up regulations of a general nature required different rules applicable under different circumstances, respectively allowing and blocking the “communicability” effect. Furthermore, this quest shows how these origins are related to cases subject currently to a particular and different regulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-54552020000100499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-54552020000100499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西班牙总结了《智利刑法》第64条的字面适用,该条规定了与沟通问题及其作为最近综合改革项目典范的作用有关的规则,并根据其历史背景证明了这一问题的合理性。它的起源最终可以追溯到罗马法,通过国家法典的通常模式(1848年西班牙法典于1850年修订)和1819年那不勒斯法典。观察到的发展表明,在不同的情况下,普遍的努力需要同时容纳可通信性和可通信性的规则,但不妨碍表明与今天接受特殊和单独治疗的假设的联系。Englishabstract对《智利刑法》第64条的历史背景的调查(这是一项重要的法律规定,因为它处理了所谓的“可沟通性”问题,是最近法律改革建议的典范),是有道理的,因为它是根据其字面意思解释的。它的起源最终可以追溯到罗马法,通过国家立法的通常模式(1850年修订的1848年西班牙法典)和1819年的尼阿波利坦法典。这一发展强调,制定一般性法规的过程需要在不同情况下适用不同的规则,分别允许和阻止“可沟通性”效应。此外,这一问题还表明,这些起源如何与目前受特定和不同法规约束的案件有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Los orígenes históricos de las reglas sobre comunicabilidad de las circunstancias modificatorias del Código Penal chileno: antecedentes en la codificación napolitana y en el derecho romano
espanolResumen La aplicacion literal del articulo 64 del Codigo Penal chileno, relevante en cuanto que establece reglas vinculadas con el pro blema de la comunicabilidad y por su rol como modelo de los recientes proyectos de reforma integral, justifica la pregunta por sus antecedentes historicos. Sus origenes se pueden rastrear finalmente hasta el derecho romano, pasando por el modelo habitual de la codificacion nacional (el Codigo espanol de 1848 reformado en 1850) y por la codificacion napolitana de 1819. La evolucion observada pone de manifiesto que el esfuerzo generalizador requirio de reglas que acojan tanto la incomunicabilidad como la comunicabilidad, para distintos supuestos, sin perjuicio de mostrar una vinculacion con hipotesis que hoy reciben un tratamiento especial y separado. EnglishAbstract A quest for the historical background of Article 64 of the Chilean Criminal Code (legal provision significant as it deals with the so-called problem of “communicability” and as a model for recent proposals of legal reform) is justified because it is interpreted based on the literal meaning of its wording. Its origins can be traced back eventually to Roman Law, through the usual model of the national legislation (the Spanish Code of 1848 as amended in 1850) and through the Neapolitan codification of 1819. This evolution underlines that the process of setting up regulations of a general nature required different rules applicable under different circumstances, respectively allowing and blocking the “communicability” effect. Furthermore, this quest shows how these origins are related to cases subject currently to a particular and different regulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos
Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The aim of Revista de Estudios Histórico-Jurídicos (abbreviation REHJ, for Historical-Legal Studies Journal) is to spread original and unpublished articles regarding dogmatic, legislative and institutional history in the fields of Roman Law and Legal History, especially in the European and Ibero-American Romanistic tradition; and of History of Western legal and political thought; even if these are lectures given at scientific congresses. It also accepts revisions regarding the status of an issue and broad bibliographic revisions, as long as they are of a critical nature. The Journal does not publish works of a purely philosophical, theoretical, political or sociological content; neither publishes works of a mere outreach nature, whether they consist in non-reprocessed lectures or conferences as articles, nor if they offer the assay form ("reflections", "remarks", "considerations", "note-taking", "notes" etc.). General Coverage on the Following Topics: Roman law, History of (public and private) Law, History of canon law, History of European law, Indian Law (History of the legal system applied in the Americas during the Spanish colonisation), History of the Ibero-American national laws, History of Chilean law, History of the legal dogmas, History of the legal thought, History of the political thought, History of institutions.
期刊最新文献
Recuerdos de un doctorando (1971-1974) Alejandro Guzmán Brito 1945-2021 Alejandro Guzmán y la interpretación jurídica Homenaje a Alejandro Guzmán Brito Recuerdo de Alejandro Guzmán Brito (1945-1921)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1