合众为一:权力、问题定义和美国与土著居民之间的所有权

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Critical Policy Studies Pub Date : 2022-04-10 DOI:10.1080/19460171.2022.2064319
A. Frankel, J. Bennett, Mathew Robinson, Walter F. Heinecke
{"title":"合众为一:权力、问题定义和美国与土著居民之间的所有权","authors":"A. Frankel, J. Bennett, Mathew Robinson, Walter F. Heinecke","doi":"10.1080/19460171.2022.2064319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this manuscript, we seek to understand how linguistic devices can be used to critique the moral and political frameworks surrounding the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). Specifically, we focus on two documents that reflect policy responses to the UNDRIP: (1) a press release from 13 September 2007 outlining the United States Government’s position in voting against the adoption of the UNDRIP, and (2) President Obama’s speech from 16 December 2010 about the reversal of said position. Through the use of TribalCrit to interpret our results, implications of our analyses point to the extent to which power is exercised within an announced position endorsing UNDRIP as an implicit pronouncement of state-centered goals.","PeriodicalId":51625,"journal":{"name":"Critical Policy Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"E Pluribus Unum: power, problem definition and ownership between the United States and Indigenous populations\",\"authors\":\"A. Frankel, J. Bennett, Mathew Robinson, Walter F. Heinecke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19460171.2022.2064319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this manuscript, we seek to understand how linguistic devices can be used to critique the moral and political frameworks surrounding the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). Specifically, we focus on two documents that reflect policy responses to the UNDRIP: (1) a press release from 13 September 2007 outlining the United States Government’s position in voting against the adoption of the UNDRIP, and (2) President Obama’s speech from 16 December 2010 about the reversal of said position. Through the use of TribalCrit to interpret our results, implications of our analyses point to the extent to which power is exercised within an announced position endorsing UNDRIP as an implicit pronouncement of state-centered goals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Policy Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Policy Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2022.2064319\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2022.2064319","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在这份手稿中,我们试图了解如何使用语言手段来批评围绕《联合国土著人民权利宣言》(UNDRIP)的道德和政治框架。具体而言,我们重点关注两份反映对《联合国发展援助方案》的政策回应的文件:(1)2007年9月13日的新闻稿,概述了美国政府投票反对通过《联合国开发援助方案》时的立场;(2)2010年12月16日奥巴马总统关于推翻上述立场的讲话。通过使用TribalCrit来解释我们的结果,我们的分析表明,在宣布的支持UNDRIP作为以国家为中心的目标的隐含声明的立场下,权力的行使程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
E Pluribus Unum: power, problem definition and ownership between the United States and Indigenous populations
ABSTRACT In this manuscript, we seek to understand how linguistic devices can be used to critique the moral and political frameworks surrounding the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). Specifically, we focus on two documents that reflect policy responses to the UNDRIP: (1) a press release from 13 September 2007 outlining the United States Government’s position in voting against the adoption of the UNDRIP, and (2) President Obama’s speech from 16 December 2010 about the reversal of said position. Through the use of TribalCrit to interpret our results, implications of our analyses point to the extent to which power is exercised within an announced position endorsing UNDRIP as an implicit pronouncement of state-centered goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
A complementary approach to Critical Frame Analysis and ‘what is the policy represented to Be?’ Pragmatism over sovereignty? The Italian policy response to the infrastructuralization of non-EU cloud service providers Exploring counter hegemony and action research to address the climate crisis Social prescribing for and beyond health: hyper-solutionism in health policy What problems is the AI act solving? Technological solutionism, fundamental rights, and trustworthiness in European AI policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1