四大会计师事务所是否提高了中国审计质量?“幕后观察”

IF 0.9 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of International Accounting Research Pub Date : 2022-04-22 DOI:10.2308/jiar-2020-056
Songsheng Chen, Gopal V. Krishnan, Wenying Li, Yinqi Zhang
{"title":"四大会计师事务所是否提高了中国审计质量?“幕后观察”","authors":"Songsheng Chen, Gopal V. Krishnan, Wenying Li, Yinqi Zhang","doi":"10.2308/jiar-2020-056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We contribute to the debate on whether the “Big N effect” on audit quality is due to client self-selection by controlling for pre-audit earnings quality, an important variable omitted in prior research. Using proprietary data from the Chinese Institute of CPAs, we find that pre-audit earnings quality is higher for Big 4 clients. Controlling for pre-audit earnings quality, restatement frequency is lower for Big 4 clients than for non-Big 4 clients, but there is no significant difference in discretionary accruals between Big 4 and non-Big 4 clients. Our findings indicate that Big 4 and non-Big 4 auditors in China pursue different strategies to enhance audit quality. The Big 4 enhance audit quality by recruiting and retaining clients with higher earnings quality and acting more conservatively towards clients with a higher risk for earnings restatement. In contrast, non-Big 4 auditors enhance audit quality by requiring more downward audit adjustments.","PeriodicalId":45457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Accounting Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Big 4 Auditors Enhance Audit Quality in China? A “Behind the Scenes Look”\",\"authors\":\"Songsheng Chen, Gopal V. Krishnan, Wenying Li, Yinqi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/jiar-2020-056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We contribute to the debate on whether the “Big N effect” on audit quality is due to client self-selection by controlling for pre-audit earnings quality, an important variable omitted in prior research. Using proprietary data from the Chinese Institute of CPAs, we find that pre-audit earnings quality is higher for Big 4 clients. Controlling for pre-audit earnings quality, restatement frequency is lower for Big 4 clients than for non-Big 4 clients, but there is no significant difference in discretionary accruals between Big 4 and non-Big 4 clients. Our findings indicate that Big 4 and non-Big 4 auditors in China pursue different strategies to enhance audit quality. The Big 4 enhance audit quality by recruiting and retaining clients with higher earnings quality and acting more conservatively towards clients with a higher risk for earnings restatement. In contrast, non-Big 4 auditors enhance audit quality by requiring more downward audit adjustments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-2020-056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-2020-056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们参与了关于审计质量的“大N效应”是否是由于客户通过控制审计前盈余质量而进行的自我选择的争论,这是先前研究中遗漏的一个重要变量。使用中国注册会计师协会的专有数据,我们发现四大客户的审计前盈利质量更高。在控制审计前盈利质量方面,四大客户的重述频率低于非四大客户,但四大客户和非四大客户端的可自由支配应计项目没有显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,中国四大和非四大审计师在提高审计质量方面采取了不同的策略。四大会计师事务所通过招聘和留住盈利质量较高的客户,并对盈利重述风险较高的客户采取更保守的行动,提高了审计质量。相比之下,非四大审计机构通过要求更多的向下审计调整来提高审计质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Big 4 Auditors Enhance Audit Quality in China? A “Behind the Scenes Look”
We contribute to the debate on whether the “Big N effect” on audit quality is due to client self-selection by controlling for pre-audit earnings quality, an important variable omitted in prior research. Using proprietary data from the Chinese Institute of CPAs, we find that pre-audit earnings quality is higher for Big 4 clients. Controlling for pre-audit earnings quality, restatement frequency is lower for Big 4 clients than for non-Big 4 clients, but there is no significant difference in discretionary accruals between Big 4 and non-Big 4 clients. Our findings indicate that Big 4 and non-Big 4 auditors in China pursue different strategies to enhance audit quality. The Big 4 enhance audit quality by recruiting and retaining clients with higher earnings quality and acting more conservatively towards clients with a higher risk for earnings restatement. In contrast, non-Big 4 auditors enhance audit quality by requiring more downward audit adjustments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Cross-Border Regulatory Cooperation and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Forward-Looking Sustainability Information and Financial Analysts The Impact of Risk Disclosure Overlaps on Auditor Liability: Evidence from China Editorial Policy Covers and Front Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1