面朝龙,团结一致

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy Pub Date : 2022-04-11 DOI:10.1177/10482911221091988
J. Tessler
{"title":"面朝龙,团结一致","authors":"J. Tessler","doi":"10.1177/10482911221091988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Karen Messing begins her latest book with the stories that must be told. The accounts that she shares in Bent Out of Shape loosen the wheels for everyone to tell as well— and to break their silence. Secrets keep the systems rolling, bodies hurting, and psyches broken along with its path. Karen Messing’s voice matters. She has been a critical contributor and feminist lens, globally, on the plight of women performing at work, in nontraditional as well as traditional jobs, and a guidepost for the engagement of workers’ voices and knowledge in occupational health research and intervention. New Solutions readers may be familiar with her prior ground-breaking works about why research conclusions based on male workers don’t apply to women, why scientists must talk to and learn from workers when conducting occupational health research, and the urgency to unpack the myths of “safe” and “light” women’s work through ergonomic analyses. In this remarkably personal and important book, Messing gleans stories from a 17 year-long collaboration between research scientists, legal scholars, and the members of Canadian trade union women’s committees. She brings us back to a time when the male gaze was unrelenting and ubiquitous, where men were entitled to comment, judge, and assess any aspect of women’s bodies, brains, and potential, especially at work. Although presenting a number of carefully detailed examples, Messing reflects on the gendered manipulations, humiliations, trickery, groping, and assaults that are institutionalized in so many low-wage or traditionally male workplaces. Shame excels at its primary goal: to maintain power relations and to sustain the status quo. Each generation has its own sickening version of these abuses and Messing shares hers. The mortar for the tiles of shame is laid early, reinforced everywhere, and residue remains despite a lifetime of intentionally routing it out and scraping it off with force. We know that poorly designed jobs often lead to injury and illness, and that such design can be physical, psychosocial, or economic. Shame about work-related injuries and illnesses—and the resultant silence—is only possible when workers are blamed, afraid of job loss if they leave or are fired, or fear retaliation and humiliation if they stay. The silence is compounded when complaints feed the external myths about women’s inability to perform the work as assigned, often work that shouldn’t have been designed that way for ANY human. Internalized beliefs that women’s bodies are “different, abnormal, weaker” contribute to such silence. Although acknowledging the grave injustices men face in unsafe workplaces, Messing reminds us “it is most often women (and gender non-conforming men) who experience a forced choice between gender equality and their health” (p. xvii). And why does Messing describe only cisgender women in this book? Messing clarifies in her introduction that “... in the unionized, low-paid workplaces (where her research was conducted), trans and nonbinary women have not been visible.” Given the documented harassment and discrimination of gender nonconforming workers, it is reasonable to hypothesize that a nonbinary or transidentity in similar work environments would add layers of additional risk in terms of psychosocial hazards and misfitting job design. The remedy to these ills? Solidarity, of course; but we learn it is easier said than done, with multilevel challenges, tensions between collective and individual needs, with varying levels of support and recognition from union leaders, employer representatives, research scientists, and government officials. Sometimes it works beautifully, in examples that Messing celebrates. Sometimes it doesn’t work and Messing gets big points for her rare honesty.","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"161 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facing Down the Dragon, With Solidarity\",\"authors\":\"J. Tessler\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10482911221091988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Karen Messing begins her latest book with the stories that must be told. The accounts that she shares in Bent Out of Shape loosen the wheels for everyone to tell as well— and to break their silence. Secrets keep the systems rolling, bodies hurting, and psyches broken along with its path. Karen Messing’s voice matters. She has been a critical contributor and feminist lens, globally, on the plight of women performing at work, in nontraditional as well as traditional jobs, and a guidepost for the engagement of workers’ voices and knowledge in occupational health research and intervention. New Solutions readers may be familiar with her prior ground-breaking works about why research conclusions based on male workers don’t apply to women, why scientists must talk to and learn from workers when conducting occupational health research, and the urgency to unpack the myths of “safe” and “light” women’s work through ergonomic analyses. In this remarkably personal and important book, Messing gleans stories from a 17 year-long collaboration between research scientists, legal scholars, and the members of Canadian trade union women’s committees. She brings us back to a time when the male gaze was unrelenting and ubiquitous, where men were entitled to comment, judge, and assess any aspect of women’s bodies, brains, and potential, especially at work. Although presenting a number of carefully detailed examples, Messing reflects on the gendered manipulations, humiliations, trickery, groping, and assaults that are institutionalized in so many low-wage or traditionally male workplaces. Shame excels at its primary goal: to maintain power relations and to sustain the status quo. Each generation has its own sickening version of these abuses and Messing shares hers. The mortar for the tiles of shame is laid early, reinforced everywhere, and residue remains despite a lifetime of intentionally routing it out and scraping it off with force. We know that poorly designed jobs often lead to injury and illness, and that such design can be physical, psychosocial, or economic. Shame about work-related injuries and illnesses—and the resultant silence—is only possible when workers are blamed, afraid of job loss if they leave or are fired, or fear retaliation and humiliation if they stay. The silence is compounded when complaints feed the external myths about women’s inability to perform the work as assigned, often work that shouldn’t have been designed that way for ANY human. Internalized beliefs that women’s bodies are “different, abnormal, weaker” contribute to such silence. Although acknowledging the grave injustices men face in unsafe workplaces, Messing reminds us “it is most often women (and gender non-conforming men) who experience a forced choice between gender equality and their health” (p. xvii). And why does Messing describe only cisgender women in this book? Messing clarifies in her introduction that “... in the unionized, low-paid workplaces (where her research was conducted), trans and nonbinary women have not been visible.” Given the documented harassment and discrimination of gender nonconforming workers, it is reasonable to hypothesize that a nonbinary or transidentity in similar work environments would add layers of additional risk in terms of psychosocial hazards and misfitting job design. The remedy to these ills? Solidarity, of course; but we learn it is easier said than done, with multilevel challenges, tensions between collective and individual needs, with varying levels of support and recognition from union leaders, employer representatives, research scientists, and government officials. Sometimes it works beautifully, in examples that Messing celebrates. Sometimes it doesn’t work and Messing gets big points for her rare honesty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"161 - 164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221091988\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911221091988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

凯伦·梅辛(Karen Messing)在她的最新一本书的开头讲述了必须讲述的故事。她在《弯曲变形》中分享的故事也让每个人都松了一口气,打破了沉默。秘密让系统运转,身体受伤,精神崩溃。凯伦·梅辛的声音很重要。在全球范围内,她一直是女性在工作、非传统和传统工作中表现困境的关键贡献者和女权主义视角,也是让工人的声音和知识参与职业健康研究和干预的指南。《新解决方案》的读者可能熟悉她之前的开创性工作,比如为什么基于男性工人的研究结论不适用于女性,为什么科学家在进行职业健康研究时必须与工人交谈并向他们学习,以及通过人体工程学分析解开女性工作“安全”和“轻松”神话的紧迫性。在这本非常个人化和重要的书中,梅辛收集了研究科学家、法律学者和加拿大工会妇女委员会成员之间长达17年的合作故事。她把我们带回了一个时代,当时男性的目光是无情的,无处不在,在那个时代,男性有权评论、评判和评估女性身体、大脑和潜力的任何方面,尤其是在工作中。尽管梅辛列举了一些详细的例子,但他反思了在许多低工资或传统男性工作场所制度化的性别操纵、羞辱、欺骗、猥亵和攻击。羞耻心擅长其首要目标:维持权力关系和维持现状。每一代人都有自己令人恶心的虐待行为,梅辛也有同感。羞耻瓷砖的砂浆铺设得很早,到处都是加固的,尽管一生都在故意将其刮掉,但残留物仍然存在。我们知道,设计不当的工作往往会导致伤害和疾病,这种设计可能是身体上的、心理上的或经济上的。只有当工人受到指责,担心离开或被解雇会失去工作,或者担心留下来会遭到报复和羞辱时,才有可能对工伤和疾病感到羞耻,以及由此产生的沉默。当抱怨加剧了外界关于女性无法完成指定工作的神话时,这种沉默变得更加严重,而这些工作通常不应该为任何人设计。认为女性身体“不同、不正常、更弱”的内在信念助长了这种沉默。尽管梅辛承认男性在不安全的工作场所面临严重的不公正,但他提醒我们,“在性别平等和健康之间被迫做出选择的往往是女性(以及性别不合的男性)”(第xvii页)。为什么梅辛在这本书中只描述顺性别女性?梅辛在她的介绍中澄清说,“……在工会化的低薪工作场所(她的研究所在地),跨性别和非二元女性并不明显。”,可以合理地假设,在类似的工作环境中,非二元或过渡身份会在心理社会危害和不适合的工作设计方面增加额外的风险。治疗这些疾病的方法是什么?团结,当然;但我们了解到,这说起来容易做起来难,有多层面的挑战,集体和个人需求之间的紧张关系,工会领导人、雇主代表、研究科学家和政府官员的支持和认可程度各不相同。有时它的效果很好,比如梅辛庆祝的例子。有时这并不奏效,梅辛因为她罕见的诚实而获得了高分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facing Down the Dragon, With Solidarity
Karen Messing begins her latest book with the stories that must be told. The accounts that she shares in Bent Out of Shape loosen the wheels for everyone to tell as well— and to break their silence. Secrets keep the systems rolling, bodies hurting, and psyches broken along with its path. Karen Messing’s voice matters. She has been a critical contributor and feminist lens, globally, on the plight of women performing at work, in nontraditional as well as traditional jobs, and a guidepost for the engagement of workers’ voices and knowledge in occupational health research and intervention. New Solutions readers may be familiar with her prior ground-breaking works about why research conclusions based on male workers don’t apply to women, why scientists must talk to and learn from workers when conducting occupational health research, and the urgency to unpack the myths of “safe” and “light” women’s work through ergonomic analyses. In this remarkably personal and important book, Messing gleans stories from a 17 year-long collaboration between research scientists, legal scholars, and the members of Canadian trade union women’s committees. She brings us back to a time when the male gaze was unrelenting and ubiquitous, where men were entitled to comment, judge, and assess any aspect of women’s bodies, brains, and potential, especially at work. Although presenting a number of carefully detailed examples, Messing reflects on the gendered manipulations, humiliations, trickery, groping, and assaults that are institutionalized in so many low-wage or traditionally male workplaces. Shame excels at its primary goal: to maintain power relations and to sustain the status quo. Each generation has its own sickening version of these abuses and Messing shares hers. The mortar for the tiles of shame is laid early, reinforced everywhere, and residue remains despite a lifetime of intentionally routing it out and scraping it off with force. We know that poorly designed jobs often lead to injury and illness, and that such design can be physical, psychosocial, or economic. Shame about work-related injuries and illnesses—and the resultant silence—is only possible when workers are blamed, afraid of job loss if they leave or are fired, or fear retaliation and humiliation if they stay. The silence is compounded when complaints feed the external myths about women’s inability to perform the work as assigned, often work that shouldn’t have been designed that way for ANY human. Internalized beliefs that women’s bodies are “different, abnormal, weaker” contribute to such silence. Although acknowledging the grave injustices men face in unsafe workplaces, Messing reminds us “it is most often women (and gender non-conforming men) who experience a forced choice between gender equality and their health” (p. xvii). And why does Messing describe only cisgender women in this book? Messing clarifies in her introduction that “... in the unionized, low-paid workplaces (where her research was conducted), trans and nonbinary women have not been visible.” Given the documented harassment and discrimination of gender nonconforming workers, it is reasonable to hypothesize that a nonbinary or transidentity in similar work environments would add layers of additional risk in terms of psychosocial hazards and misfitting job design. The remedy to these ills? Solidarity, of course; but we learn it is easier said than done, with multilevel challenges, tensions between collective and individual needs, with varying levels of support and recognition from union leaders, employer representatives, research scientists, and government officials. Sometimes it works beautifully, in examples that Messing celebrates. Sometimes it doesn’t work and Messing gets big points for her rare honesty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: New Solutions delivers authoritative responses to perplexing problems, with a worker’s voice, an activist’s commitment, a scientist’s approach, and a policy-maker’s experience. New Solutions explores the growing, changing common ground at the intersection of health, work, and the environment. The Journal makes plain how the issues in each area are interrelated and sets forth progressive, thoughtfully crafted public policy choices. It seeks a conversation on the issues between the grassroots labor and environmental activists and the professionals and researchers involved in charting society’s way forward with the understanding that lack of scientific knowledge is no excuse for doing nothing and that inaction is itself a choice.
期刊最新文献
From Worker Victory to Policy Reform: Injured Migrant Workers Fight for Return to Work Justice in Workers' Compensation in Ontario, Canada. Toxic Cargo: How Rail Transport of Vinyl Chloride Puts Millions at Risk, an Analysis One Year After the Ohio Train Derailment. Work-Related Injury and Healthcare Access Among Day Laborers. Struggling at the Esquina. A Content Analysis of Web-Based Heat Stress Materials Published by Occupational Health and Safety Ministries, Associations, and Agencies in Canada. Underestimation of Chrysotile Health Risk due to Under-ascertainment of Mesothelioma: Evidence from a Century of Connecticut's Experience with the "Magic Mineral".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1