一个有趣的发烧和左心室收缩功能不全的病例

A. Ioannou
{"title":"一个有趣的发烧和左心室收缩功能不全的病例","authors":"A. Ioannou","doi":"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"20 Webb JG, Pate GE, Munt BI. Percutaneous closure of an aortic prosthetic paravalvular leak with an Amplatzer duct occluder. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;65:69–72. 21 Piéchaud JF. Percutaneous closure of mitral paravalvular leak. J Interv Cardiol 2003;16:153–5. 22 Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, et al. Percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation: acute and 30day outcomes in 115 patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:314–21. 23 Ruiz CE, Jelnin V, Kronzon I, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous closure of periprosthetic paravalvular leaks. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:2210–7. 24 Millán X, Bouhout I, Nozza A, et al. Surgery Versus Transcatheter Interventions for Significant Paravalvular Prosthetic Leaks. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1959–69. 25 Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, et al. The learning curve in percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation: an analysis of 200 cases. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:521–9. 26 Lancellotti P, Pibarot P, Chambers J, et al. Recommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of Echocardiography, the InterAmerican Society of Echocardiography, and the Brazilian Department of Cardiovascular Imaging . Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:589–90. 27 Hascoet S, Smolka G, Bagate F, et al. Multimodality imaging guidance for percutaneous paravalvular leak closure: insights from the multicentre FFPP register. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2018;111:421–31. 28 Lesser JR, Han BK, Newell M, et al. Use of cardiac CT angiography to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of aortic prosthetic paravalvular leak: a practical guide. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2015;9:159–64. 29 Suh YJ, Hong GR, Han K, et al. Assessment of mitral paravalvular leakage after mitral valve replacement using cardiac computed tomography: comparison with surgical findings. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9. 30 de Agustin JA, JimenezQuevedo P, NombelaFranco L, et al. Paravalvular mitral leak closure under EcoXray fusion guidance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:586. 31 Faletra FF, Pozzoli A, Agricola E, et al. Echocardiographicfluoroscopic fusion imaging for transcatheter mitral valve repair guidance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:715–26. 32 Gafoor S, Steinberg DH, Franke J, et al. Tools and techniques--clinical: paravalvular leak closure. EuroIntervention 2014;9:1359–63. 33 Calvert PA, Northridge DB, Malik IS, et al. Percutaneous device closure of paravalvular leak: combined experience from the United Kingdom and Ireland. Circulation 2016;134:934–44. 34 García E, Arzamendi D, JimenezQuevedo P, et al. Outcomes and predictors of success and complications for paravalvular leak closure: an analysis of the Spanish realworld paravalvular leaks closure (HOLE) registry. EuroIntervention 2017;12:1962–8. 35 AnguloLlanos R, SarnagoCebada F, Rivera AR, et al. Twoyear follow up after surgical versus percutaneous paravalvular leak closure: a nonrandomized analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016;88:626–34. 36 Pinheiro CP, Rezek D, Costa EP, et al. Paravalvular regurgitation: clinical outcomes in surgical and percutaneous treatments. Arq Bras Cardiol 2016;107:55–62. 37 Wells JA, Condado JF, Kamioka N, et al. Outcomes after Paravalvular leak closure: transcatheter versus surgical approaches. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:500–7. 38 Taramasso M, Maisano F, Latib A, et al. Conventional surgery and transcatheter closure via surgical transapical approach for paravalvular leak repair in highrisk patients: results from a singlecentre experience. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:1161–7. 39 Alkhouli M, Rihal CS, Zack CJ, et al. Transcatheter and Surgical Management of Mitral Paravalvular Leak: LongTerm Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1946–56. 40 Pilgrim T, Franzone A. Strategies for Paravalvular Prosthetic Leak Closure: Competing or Complementary? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1970–2. 41 Busu T, Alqahtani F, Badhwar V, et al. Metaanalysis comparing transcatheter and surgical treatments of paravalvular leaks. Am J Cardiol 2018;122:302–9. 42 AbdelAal Ahmed M, Yatsynovich Y, Ramanan T, et al. Aortic paravalvular leak repair: can TAVR be the answer? JACC Case Rep 2019;1:796–802.","PeriodicalId":9311,"journal":{"name":"British Heart Journal","volume":"108 1","pages":"1011 - 1074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An interesting case of fever and left ventricular systolic dysfunction\",\"authors\":\"A. Ioannou\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"20 Webb JG, Pate GE, Munt BI. Percutaneous closure of an aortic prosthetic paravalvular leak with an Amplatzer duct occluder. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;65:69–72. 21 Piéchaud JF. Percutaneous closure of mitral paravalvular leak. J Interv Cardiol 2003;16:153–5. 22 Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, et al. Percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation: acute and 30day outcomes in 115 patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:314–21. 23 Ruiz CE, Jelnin V, Kronzon I, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous closure of periprosthetic paravalvular leaks. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:2210–7. 24 Millán X, Bouhout I, Nozza A, et al. Surgery Versus Transcatheter Interventions for Significant Paravalvular Prosthetic Leaks. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1959–69. 25 Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, et al. The learning curve in percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation: an analysis of 200 cases. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:521–9. 26 Lancellotti P, Pibarot P, Chambers J, et al. Recommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of Echocardiography, the InterAmerican Society of Echocardiography, and the Brazilian Department of Cardiovascular Imaging . Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:589–90. 27 Hascoet S, Smolka G, Bagate F, et al. Multimodality imaging guidance for percutaneous paravalvular leak closure: insights from the multicentre FFPP register. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2018;111:421–31. 28 Lesser JR, Han BK, Newell M, et al. Use of cardiac CT angiography to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of aortic prosthetic paravalvular leak: a practical guide. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2015;9:159–64. 29 Suh YJ, Hong GR, Han K, et al. Assessment of mitral paravalvular leakage after mitral valve replacement using cardiac computed tomography: comparison with surgical findings. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9. 30 de Agustin JA, JimenezQuevedo P, NombelaFranco L, et al. Paravalvular mitral leak closure under EcoXray fusion guidance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:586. 31 Faletra FF, Pozzoli A, Agricola E, et al. Echocardiographicfluoroscopic fusion imaging for transcatheter mitral valve repair guidance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:715–26. 32 Gafoor S, Steinberg DH, Franke J, et al. Tools and techniques--clinical: paravalvular leak closure. EuroIntervention 2014;9:1359–63. 33 Calvert PA, Northridge DB, Malik IS, et al. Percutaneous device closure of paravalvular leak: combined experience from the United Kingdom and Ireland. Circulation 2016;134:934–44. 34 García E, Arzamendi D, JimenezQuevedo P, et al. Outcomes and predictors of success and complications for paravalvular leak closure: an analysis of the Spanish realworld paravalvular leaks closure (HOLE) registry. EuroIntervention 2017;12:1962–8. 35 AnguloLlanos R, SarnagoCebada F, Rivera AR, et al. Twoyear follow up after surgical versus percutaneous paravalvular leak closure: a nonrandomized analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016;88:626–34. 36 Pinheiro CP, Rezek D, Costa EP, et al. Paravalvular regurgitation: clinical outcomes in surgical and percutaneous treatments. Arq Bras Cardiol 2016;107:55–62. 37 Wells JA, Condado JF, Kamioka N, et al. Outcomes after Paravalvular leak closure: transcatheter versus surgical approaches. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:500–7. 38 Taramasso M, Maisano F, Latib A, et al. Conventional surgery and transcatheter closure via surgical transapical approach for paravalvular leak repair in highrisk patients: results from a singlecentre experience. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:1161–7. 39 Alkhouli M, Rihal CS, Zack CJ, et al. Transcatheter and Surgical Management of Mitral Paravalvular Leak: LongTerm Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1946–56. 40 Pilgrim T, Franzone A. Strategies for Paravalvular Prosthetic Leak Closure: Competing or Complementary? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1970–2. 41 Busu T, Alqahtani F, Badhwar V, et al. Metaanalysis comparing transcatheter and surgical treatments of paravalvular leaks. Am J Cardiol 2018;122:302–9. 42 AbdelAal Ahmed M, Yatsynovich Y, Ramanan T, et al. Aortic paravalvular leak repair: can TAVR be the answer? JACC Case Rep 2019;1:796–802.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"1011 - 1074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

20 Webb JG,Pate GE,Munt BI.用Amplatzer导管封堵器经皮封堵人工主动脉瓣周漏。2005年《导管心血管介入》;65:69-72.21Piéchaud-JF.经皮二尖瓣旁漏封堵术。《介入心脏病学杂志》2003;16:153–5.22 Sorajja P,Cabalka AK,Hagler DJ等。经皮修复瓣膜周围人工瓣膜反流:115例患者的急性和30天结果。Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:314–21.23 Ruiz CE,Jelnin V,Kronzon I等。经皮封堵人工瓣膜周围渗漏患者的临床结果。《美国心血管杂志》2011;58:2210–7.24 Millán X,Bouhout I,Nozza A,et al.外科手术与经导管介入治疗严重瓣膜旁假体渗漏。JACC心血管介入2017;10:1959–69.25 Sorajja P,Cabalka AK,Hagler DJ等。经皮修复瓣膜周围人工瓣膜返流的学习曲线:200例分析。JACC心血管介入2014;7:521–9.26 Lancellotti P,Pibarot P,Chambers J等。人工心脏瓣膜成像评估建议:中国超声心动图学会、美洲超声心动图协会和巴西心血管成像部认可的欧洲心血管成像协会报告。Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:589–90.27 Hascoet S,Smolka G,Bagate F等。经皮瓣旁漏闭合的多模式成像指导:来自多中心FFPP登记的见解。Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2018;111:421–31.28 Lesser JR,Han BK,Newell M,et al.使用心脏CT血管造影术辅助诊断和治疗主动脉人工瓣周漏:实用指南。心血管计算机杂志2015;9:159–64.29 Suh YJ,Hong GR,Han K,等。心脏计算机断层扫描评价二尖瓣置换术后二尖瓣瓣周漏:与手术结果的比较。Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9.30 de Agustin JA,JimenezQuevedo P,NombelaFranco L等。EcoX射线融合引导下二尖瓣瓣旁漏的闭合。Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:586.31 Faletra FF,Pozzoli A,Agricola E等。超声心动图透视融合成像用于经导管二尖瓣修复指导。Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:715–26.32 Gafoor S,Steinberg DH,Franke J等。工具和技术——临床:瓣周渗漏闭合。2014年欧洲干预;9:1359–63.33 Calvert PA,Northridge DB,Malik IS等。经皮瓣膜旁渗漏装置封堵术:英国和爱尔兰的综合经验。2016年发行量;134:934–44.34 García E,Arzamendi D,JimenezQuevedo P等。瓣膜周围渗漏封堵术的成功和并发症的结果和预测因素:对西班牙真实世界瓣膜周围渗漏闭合术(HOLE)登记的分析。2017年欧洲干预;12:1962–8.35 AnguloLlanos R,SarnagoCebada F,Rivera AR等。手术与经皮瓣旁渗漏封堵术后的Twoyear随访:一项非随机分析。2016年《导管心血管介入》;88:626–34.36 Pinheiro CP,Rezek D,Costa EP等。瓣膜周围反流:外科和经皮治疗的临床结果。Arq Bras Cardiol 2016;107:55–62.37 Wells JA,Condado JF,Kamioka N等。瓣膜旁渗漏封堵术后的结果:经导管与手术方法。JACC心血管介入2017;10:500–7.38 Taramasso M,Maisano F,Latib A等。高危患者瓣膜周渗漏修复的常规手术和经心尖手术入路经导管封堵术:单中心经验的结果。欧洲心脏杂志心血管成像2014;15:1161–7.39 Alkhouli M,Rihal CS,Zack CJ等。二尖瓣旁漏的经导管和外科治疗:长期结果。JACC心血管介入2017;10:1946–56.40 Pilgrim T,Franzone A.瓣膜旁人工瓣膜封堵术的策略:竞争还是互补?JACC心血管介入2017;10:1970–2.41 Busu T,Alqahtani F,Badhwar V等。瓣膜周围渗漏的经导管和外科治疗的荟萃分析比较。Am J Cardiol 2018;122:302-9.42 AbdelAal Ahmed M,Yatswich Y,Ramanan T等。主动脉瓣旁渗漏修复:TAVR能成为答案吗?JACC案例代表2019;1:796–802。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An interesting case of fever and left ventricular systolic dysfunction
20 Webb JG, Pate GE, Munt BI. Percutaneous closure of an aortic prosthetic paravalvular leak with an Amplatzer duct occluder. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;65:69–72. 21 Piéchaud JF. Percutaneous closure of mitral paravalvular leak. J Interv Cardiol 2003;16:153–5. 22 Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, et al. Percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation: acute and 30day outcomes in 115 patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:314–21. 23 Ruiz CE, Jelnin V, Kronzon I, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous closure of periprosthetic paravalvular leaks. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:2210–7. 24 Millán X, Bouhout I, Nozza A, et al. Surgery Versus Transcatheter Interventions for Significant Paravalvular Prosthetic Leaks. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1959–69. 25 Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, et al. The learning curve in percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation: an analysis of 200 cases. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:521–9. 26 Lancellotti P, Pibarot P, Chambers J, et al. Recommendations for the imaging assessment of prosthetic heart valves: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Chinese Society of Echocardiography, the InterAmerican Society of Echocardiography, and the Brazilian Department of Cardiovascular Imaging . Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:589–90. 27 Hascoet S, Smolka G, Bagate F, et al. Multimodality imaging guidance for percutaneous paravalvular leak closure: insights from the multicentre FFPP register. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2018;111:421–31. 28 Lesser JR, Han BK, Newell M, et al. Use of cardiac CT angiography to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of aortic prosthetic paravalvular leak: a practical guide. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2015;9:159–64. 29 Suh YJ, Hong GR, Han K, et al. Assessment of mitral paravalvular leakage after mitral valve replacement using cardiac computed tomography: comparison with surgical findings. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9. 30 de Agustin JA, JimenezQuevedo P, NombelaFranco L, et al. Paravalvular mitral leak closure under EcoXray fusion guidance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:586. 31 Faletra FF, Pozzoli A, Agricola E, et al. Echocardiographicfluoroscopic fusion imaging for transcatheter mitral valve repair guidance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:715–26. 32 Gafoor S, Steinberg DH, Franke J, et al. Tools and techniques--clinical: paravalvular leak closure. EuroIntervention 2014;9:1359–63. 33 Calvert PA, Northridge DB, Malik IS, et al. Percutaneous device closure of paravalvular leak: combined experience from the United Kingdom and Ireland. Circulation 2016;134:934–44. 34 García E, Arzamendi D, JimenezQuevedo P, et al. Outcomes and predictors of success and complications for paravalvular leak closure: an analysis of the Spanish realworld paravalvular leaks closure (HOLE) registry. EuroIntervention 2017;12:1962–8. 35 AnguloLlanos R, SarnagoCebada F, Rivera AR, et al. Twoyear follow up after surgical versus percutaneous paravalvular leak closure: a nonrandomized analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016;88:626–34. 36 Pinheiro CP, Rezek D, Costa EP, et al. Paravalvular regurgitation: clinical outcomes in surgical and percutaneous treatments. Arq Bras Cardiol 2016;107:55–62. 37 Wells JA, Condado JF, Kamioka N, et al. Outcomes after Paravalvular leak closure: transcatheter versus surgical approaches. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:500–7. 38 Taramasso M, Maisano F, Latib A, et al. Conventional surgery and transcatheter closure via surgical transapical approach for paravalvular leak repair in highrisk patients: results from a singlecentre experience. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:1161–7. 39 Alkhouli M, Rihal CS, Zack CJ, et al. Transcatheter and Surgical Management of Mitral Paravalvular Leak: LongTerm Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1946–56. 40 Pilgrim T, Franzone A. Strategies for Paravalvular Prosthetic Leak Closure: Competing or Complementary? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1970–2. 41 Busu T, Alqahtani F, Badhwar V, et al. Metaanalysis comparing transcatheter and surgical treatments of paravalvular leaks. Am J Cardiol 2018;122:302–9. 42 AbdelAal Ahmed M, Yatsynovich Y, Ramanan T, et al. Aortic paravalvular leak repair: can TAVR be the answer? JACC Case Rep 2019;1:796–802.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A retrospective review of empiric acyclovir prescribing practices for suspected viral central nervous system infections: A single-centre study. Cortical Morphology in Cannabis Use Disorder: Implications for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment. Socioeconomic status and entrepreneurial networking responses to the COVID-19 crisis. Cardiac microstructural alterations measured by echocardiography identify sex-specific risk for heart failure. Aspirin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1