透过黑镜:大众文化中的性别与技术话语

Chiara Modugno, T. Krijnen
{"title":"透过黑镜:大众文化中的性别与技术话语","authors":"Chiara Modugno, T. Krijnen","doi":"10.1386/cjcs_00011_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"_Technology’s place in society is increasingly significant and debated. Although the \ninclusion of gender in discussions about technology is not novel, striking examples \nsuch as sexism (and racism) in artificial intelligence underscore the urgency \nof the debate. Popular sci-fi TV forms an important arena for the meaning-making \non gender and technology for its audiences. Going beyond ‘gender essentialism’ \nand ‘technological determinism’, this study investigates gender and technology \nas represented in Black Mirror. As an anthology series, Black Mirror presents its \naudiences recognizable technologies and a diverse cast (in terms of gender and \nrace). Employing a mixture of narrative and discourse analysis on all episodes \nof Black Mirror, how discourses on technology are gendered in Black Mirror is \nunravelled. Two dominant discourses – the Spectacle and the New Social Contract \n– show that beyond a manifest gender neutrality of technology, on a latent level \npatriarchal discourses are dominant in imagined future societies._","PeriodicalId":53977,"journal":{"name":"Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"3-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Through the Black Mirror: Discourses on gender and technology in popular culture\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Modugno, T. Krijnen\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/cjcs_00011_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"_Technology’s place in society is increasingly significant and debated. Although the \\ninclusion of gender in discussions about technology is not novel, striking examples \\nsuch as sexism (and racism) in artificial intelligence underscore the urgency \\nof the debate. Popular sci-fi TV forms an important arena for the meaning-making \\non gender and technology for its audiences. Going beyond ‘gender essentialism’ \\nand ‘technological determinism’, this study investigates gender and technology \\nas represented in Black Mirror. As an anthology series, Black Mirror presents its \\naudiences recognizable technologies and a diverse cast (in terms of gender and \\nrace). Employing a mixture of narrative and discourse analysis on all episodes \\nof Black Mirror, how discourses on technology are gendered in Black Mirror is \\nunravelled. Two dominant discourses – the Spectacle and the New Social Contract \\n– show that beyond a manifest gender neutrality of technology, on a latent level \\npatriarchal discourses are dominant in imagined future societies._\",\"PeriodicalId\":53977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"3-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00011_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/cjcs_00011_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

_技术在社会中的地位越来越重要,争论也越来越多。尽管将性别问题纳入技术讨论并不新鲜,但人工智能中的性别歧视(和种族主义)等引人注目的例子突显了辩论的紧迫性。流行科幻电视为观众提供了一个关于性别和技术意义的重要舞台。本研究超越了“性别本质主义”和“技术决定论”,探讨了以《黑镜》为代表的性别与技术。作为一个选集系列,《黑镜》向观众展示了可识别的技术和多样化的演员阵容(在性别和种族方面)。采用叙事和话语分析相结合的方法对《黑镜》的所有剧集进行分析,揭示了《黑镜”中关于技术的话语是如何性别化的。两种占主导地位的话语——《奇观》和《新社会契约》——表明,除了明显的技术性别中立之外,在潜在的层面上,父权话语在想象中的未来社会中占主导地位_
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Through the Black Mirror: Discourses on gender and technology in popular culture
_Technology’s place in society is increasingly significant and debated. Although the inclusion of gender in discussions about technology is not novel, striking examples such as sexism (and racism) in artificial intelligence underscore the urgency of the debate. Popular sci-fi TV forms an important arena for the meaning-making on gender and technology for its audiences. Going beyond ‘gender essentialism’ and ‘technological determinism’, this study investigates gender and technology as represented in Black Mirror. As an anthology series, Black Mirror presents its audiences recognizable technologies and a diverse cast (in terms of gender and race). Employing a mixture of narrative and discourse analysis on all episodes of Black Mirror, how discourses on technology are gendered in Black Mirror is unravelled. Two dominant discourses – the Spectacle and the New Social Contract – show that beyond a manifest gender neutrality of technology, on a latent level patriarchal discourses are dominant in imagined future societies._
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Quality journalism and advocacy in raising climate awareness: The case of The Guardian Social inequalities in the making sense of climate change narratives Analysis of climate denialism on YouTube: Refuting instead of debating El bucle invisible (The Invisible Loop), Remedios Zafra (2022) The pluriverse of the Anthropocene: One Earth, many worlds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1