密西西比文化英雄,仪式王权,和神圣的束

Q1 Social Sciences Southeastern Archaeology Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/0734578X.2022.2132191
T. Emerson
{"title":"密西西比文化英雄,仪式王权,和神圣的束","authors":"T. Emerson","doi":"10.1080/0734578X.2022.2132191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"adjacent sugar factory. The archaeological evidence indicates the village was abandoned shortly after emancipation, although the village’s location remained marked on maps as late as 1871. Meniketti argues the inclusion of the long-deserted village on maps was part of the plantocracy’s efforts to uphold order in a landscape they no longer controlled. Meanwhile, Helen C. Blouet’s work (Chapter 9) considers how burial and commemorative practices of enslaved and free African members of the Moravian Church on St. John and Barbados changed with emancipation. On St. John, which boasts a long history of free African landownership, the family-centered practice of house yard burials remained a custom; while on Barbados, community-oriented churchyard burials increased in the postemancipation era as land ownership opportunities for free Barbadians remained scarce until the twentieth century. Life after the abolition of slavery is the subject of John C. Chenoweth and Khadene K. Harris’s chapters. Based on his examination of a nineteenth-century smallholder settlement on Great Camanoe Island in the British Virgin Islands, Chenoweth (Chapter 10) suggests that free African inhabitants worked to improve their pre-emanipation homestead by salvaging materials from a nearby abandoned planter’s residence, as well as the mindful recycling and reuse of objects with only limited supplement from local markets. In contrast to Chenoweth’s continuity of place model, Harris’ evidence from Dominica points to the opposite phenomenon, change (Chapter 11). At Bois Cotlette Estate, the emergence of sharecropping and tenancy resulted in archaeologically observable shifts away from communally organized residential patterns that existed under plantation slavery to individualized ones in the postemancipation era. With emancipation, Caribbean people also experienced increased mobility and new opportunities. Stephen T. Lenik and Zachary J. M. Beier (Chapter 12) explore the archaeological remains of British military regiments of African-Jamicans at Fort Rocky in Kingston Harbor, Jamaica between 1880 and 1945. While military architecture and material culture stressed homogeneity, the excavated material culture demonstrates how social boundaries could be tested in everyday practice. Finally, Kristin Fellows (Chapter 13) profiles a community of free African Americans who made the decision to migrate to Hispaniola beginning in 1824, and the challenges they faced in deciding if they should return to the United States after the end of the American Civil War. The volume concludes with remarks by Laurie Wilkie (Chapter 14) who draws on her own deep experience with plantation archaeology in both the Bahamas and the southeastern United States, to synthesize the preceding chapters and reflect on which “spaces in between” remain understudied. As with any edited volume, there are inevitable gaps. The book’s title implies an inclusive regional scale, and yet the chapters are overwhelmingly focused on the former British Caribbean. The chance to highlight important and interesting archaeological research ongoing outside the Anglophone Caribbean is a missed opportunity. Nevertheless, the editors’ aim to profile archaeological research not specifically tied to sugar monoculture is a constructive contribution that will be of interest to archaeologists not just in the Caribbean, but also those working in adjacent regions where cash-crop agriculture came to dominate the economy, but the “spaces in between” lag in their scholarly attention.","PeriodicalId":34945,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Archaeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mississippian Culture Heroes, Ritual Regalia, and Sacred Bundles\",\"authors\":\"T. Emerson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0734578X.2022.2132191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"adjacent sugar factory. The archaeological evidence indicates the village was abandoned shortly after emancipation, although the village’s location remained marked on maps as late as 1871. Meniketti argues the inclusion of the long-deserted village on maps was part of the plantocracy’s efforts to uphold order in a landscape they no longer controlled. Meanwhile, Helen C. Blouet’s work (Chapter 9) considers how burial and commemorative practices of enslaved and free African members of the Moravian Church on St. John and Barbados changed with emancipation. On St. John, which boasts a long history of free African landownership, the family-centered practice of house yard burials remained a custom; while on Barbados, community-oriented churchyard burials increased in the postemancipation era as land ownership opportunities for free Barbadians remained scarce until the twentieth century. Life after the abolition of slavery is the subject of John C. Chenoweth and Khadene K. Harris’s chapters. Based on his examination of a nineteenth-century smallholder settlement on Great Camanoe Island in the British Virgin Islands, Chenoweth (Chapter 10) suggests that free African inhabitants worked to improve their pre-emanipation homestead by salvaging materials from a nearby abandoned planter’s residence, as well as the mindful recycling and reuse of objects with only limited supplement from local markets. In contrast to Chenoweth’s continuity of place model, Harris’ evidence from Dominica points to the opposite phenomenon, change (Chapter 11). At Bois Cotlette Estate, the emergence of sharecropping and tenancy resulted in archaeologically observable shifts away from communally organized residential patterns that existed under plantation slavery to individualized ones in the postemancipation era. With emancipation, Caribbean people also experienced increased mobility and new opportunities. Stephen T. Lenik and Zachary J. M. Beier (Chapter 12) explore the archaeological remains of British military regiments of African-Jamicans at Fort Rocky in Kingston Harbor, Jamaica between 1880 and 1945. While military architecture and material culture stressed homogeneity, the excavated material culture demonstrates how social boundaries could be tested in everyday practice. Finally, Kristin Fellows (Chapter 13) profiles a community of free African Americans who made the decision to migrate to Hispaniola beginning in 1824, and the challenges they faced in deciding if they should return to the United States after the end of the American Civil War. The volume concludes with remarks by Laurie Wilkie (Chapter 14) who draws on her own deep experience with plantation archaeology in both the Bahamas and the southeastern United States, to synthesize the preceding chapters and reflect on which “spaces in between” remain understudied. As with any edited volume, there are inevitable gaps. The book’s title implies an inclusive regional scale, and yet the chapters are overwhelmingly focused on the former British Caribbean. The chance to highlight important and interesting archaeological research ongoing outside the Anglophone Caribbean is a missed opportunity. Nevertheless, the editors’ aim to profile archaeological research not specifically tied to sugar monoculture is a constructive contribution that will be of interest to archaeologists not just in the Caribbean, but also those working in adjacent regions where cash-crop agriculture came to dominate the economy, but the “spaces in between” lag in their scholarly attention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southeastern Archaeology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southeastern Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0734578X.2022.2132191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeastern Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0734578X.2022.2132191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

邻近的糖厂。考古证据表明,这个村庄在解放后不久就被遗弃了,尽管直到1871年,这个村庄的位置还在地图上有标记。梅尼科蒂认为,将这个长期被遗弃的村庄纳入地图,是植物统治国家在他们不再控制的土地上维持秩序的努力的一部分。同时,Helen C. Blouet的作品(第9章)考虑了摩拉维亚教会在圣约翰和巴巴多斯的被奴役和自由的非洲成员的葬礼和纪念活动是如何随着解放而改变的。圣约翰岛拥有悠久的非洲自由土地所有权历史,以家庭为中心的土葬仍然是一种习俗;而在巴巴多斯,以社区为导向的教堂墓地埋葬在解放后的时代有所增加,因为直到20世纪,自由的巴巴多斯人拥有土地的机会仍然很少。废除奴隶制后的生活是约翰·c·切诺维斯和哈德妮·k·哈里斯书中的主题。根据他对19世纪英属维尔京群岛大卡马诺岛上的一个小农定居点的考察,切诺维斯(第十章)认为,自由的非洲居民通过从附近一个废弃的种植园主的住所中回收材料,以及有意识地回收和再利用物品,只从当地市场获得有限的补充,来改善他们在解放前的家园。与切诺维斯的地方模型的连续性相反,哈里斯从多米尼克得到的证据指向了相反的现象——变化(第11章)。在Bois Cotlette庄园,佃农和租赁的出现导致了考古学上可观察到的从种植园奴隶制下存在的社区组织的居住模式到后解放时代的个性化居住模式的转变。随着解放,加勒比人民也经历了更大的流动性和新的机会。Stephen T. Lenik和Zachary J. M. Beier(第12章)探索了1880年至1945年间牙买加金斯敦港洛基堡的非裔牙买加人英国军队的考古遗迹。虽然军事建筑和物质文化强调同质性,但挖掘出来的物质文化展示了如何在日常实践中检验社会界限。最后,Kristin Fellows(第13章)描述了一个从1824年开始决定移民到伊斯帕尼奥拉岛的自由非裔美国人社区,以及他们在美国内战结束后决定是否应该返回美国时所面临的挑战。本书以Laurie Wilkie的评论(第14章)结束,她利用自己在巴哈马和美国东南部的种植园考古方面的深刻经验,综合了前面的章节,并反思了哪些“中间空间”仍未得到充分研究。与任何编辑过的书籍一样,书中难免存在空白。这本书的标题暗示了一个包容性的地区规模,但章节绝大多数集中在前英属加勒比地区。强调加勒比海英语国家以外正在进行的重要而有趣的考古研究的机会是一个错失的机会。尽管如此,编辑们的目的是概述与单一种植糖无关的考古研究,这是一项建设性的贡献,不仅对加勒比海的考古学家感兴趣,而且对那些在经济作物农业主导经济的邻近地区工作的考古学家也感兴趣,但“中间空间”在他们的学术关注中滞后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mississippian Culture Heroes, Ritual Regalia, and Sacred Bundles
adjacent sugar factory. The archaeological evidence indicates the village was abandoned shortly after emancipation, although the village’s location remained marked on maps as late as 1871. Meniketti argues the inclusion of the long-deserted village on maps was part of the plantocracy’s efforts to uphold order in a landscape they no longer controlled. Meanwhile, Helen C. Blouet’s work (Chapter 9) considers how burial and commemorative practices of enslaved and free African members of the Moravian Church on St. John and Barbados changed with emancipation. On St. John, which boasts a long history of free African landownership, the family-centered practice of house yard burials remained a custom; while on Barbados, community-oriented churchyard burials increased in the postemancipation era as land ownership opportunities for free Barbadians remained scarce until the twentieth century. Life after the abolition of slavery is the subject of John C. Chenoweth and Khadene K. Harris’s chapters. Based on his examination of a nineteenth-century smallholder settlement on Great Camanoe Island in the British Virgin Islands, Chenoweth (Chapter 10) suggests that free African inhabitants worked to improve their pre-emanipation homestead by salvaging materials from a nearby abandoned planter’s residence, as well as the mindful recycling and reuse of objects with only limited supplement from local markets. In contrast to Chenoweth’s continuity of place model, Harris’ evidence from Dominica points to the opposite phenomenon, change (Chapter 11). At Bois Cotlette Estate, the emergence of sharecropping and tenancy resulted in archaeologically observable shifts away from communally organized residential patterns that existed under plantation slavery to individualized ones in the postemancipation era. With emancipation, Caribbean people also experienced increased mobility and new opportunities. Stephen T. Lenik and Zachary J. M. Beier (Chapter 12) explore the archaeological remains of British military regiments of African-Jamicans at Fort Rocky in Kingston Harbor, Jamaica between 1880 and 1945. While military architecture and material culture stressed homogeneity, the excavated material culture demonstrates how social boundaries could be tested in everyday practice. Finally, Kristin Fellows (Chapter 13) profiles a community of free African Americans who made the decision to migrate to Hispaniola beginning in 1824, and the challenges they faced in deciding if they should return to the United States after the end of the American Civil War. The volume concludes with remarks by Laurie Wilkie (Chapter 14) who draws on her own deep experience with plantation archaeology in both the Bahamas and the southeastern United States, to synthesize the preceding chapters and reflect on which “spaces in between” remain understudied. As with any edited volume, there are inevitable gaps. The book’s title implies an inclusive regional scale, and yet the chapters are overwhelmingly focused on the former British Caribbean. The chance to highlight important and interesting archaeological research ongoing outside the Anglophone Caribbean is a missed opportunity. Nevertheless, the editors’ aim to profile archaeological research not specifically tied to sugar monoculture is a constructive contribution that will be of interest to archaeologists not just in the Caribbean, but also those working in adjacent regions where cash-crop agriculture came to dominate the economy, but the “spaces in between” lag in their scholarly attention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Southeastern Archaeology
Southeastern Archaeology Social Sciences-Archeology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Southeastern Archaeology is a refereed journal that publishes works concerning the archaeology and history of southeastern North America and neighboring regions. It covers all time periods, from Paleoindian to recent history and defines the southeast broadly; this could be anything from Florida (south) to Wisconsin (North) and from Oklahoma (west) to Virginia (east). Reports or articles that cover neighboring regions such as the Northeast, Plains, or Caribbean would be considered if they had sufficient relevance.
期刊最新文献
Sixteenth-century European metal artifacts from the Marengo complex, Alabama Cultural and chronological variation in Woodland and Mississippian mortuary practices on the edge of Greater Cahokia Tick Island Incised: an early ceramic skeuomorph in Late Archaic Florida Life in a Mississippian warscape: common fields, Cahokia, and the effects of warfare A Dark Pathway: Precontact Native American Glyphs from 1st Unnamed Cave, Tennessee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1