{"title":"《中国非政府孤儿救助:法律、政策与实践》,高:郑旭、沙赫拉·阿里评论","authors":"Zheng Xu, Shahla Ali","doi":"10.1017/als.2022.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anna High ’ s masterful and thoughtful book, Non-Governmental Orphan Relief in China: Law, Policy and Practice , examines the interplay between non-governmental and governmental orphan relief efforts in Mainland China. Both specialist and non-specialist readers will appreciate the humanitarian value of this work, focusing as it does on issues of child rights in the context of China ’ s most disadvantaged children — gu ’ er , otherwise known as “ the lonely orphans. ” High ’ s book is the result of in-depth socio-legal case-based research published by the Routledge Contemporary China Series focusing on the legal grey zone of non-state orga-nized gu ’ er relief in contemporary China. It draws on a multi-year process participant observation and semi-structured interviews with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and private caregivers across rural and urban China to shed light on the ambiguous role of law in child welfare. The author ’ s nearly decade-long longitudinal ethnographic fieldwork reflects recent developments in Chinese charity law, with particular reference to the silent, and at times invisible, uphill struggle of non-governmental gu ’ er welfare providers in China.","PeriodicalId":54015,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","volume":"9 1","pages":"523 - 525"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Discussion: Non-Governmental Orphan Relief in China: Law, Policy and Practice, by Anna High: Comments by Zheng Xu and Shahla Ali\",\"authors\":\"Zheng Xu, Shahla Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/als.2022.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anna High ’ s masterful and thoughtful book, Non-Governmental Orphan Relief in China: Law, Policy and Practice , examines the interplay between non-governmental and governmental orphan relief efforts in Mainland China. Both specialist and non-specialist readers will appreciate the humanitarian value of this work, focusing as it does on issues of child rights in the context of China ’ s most disadvantaged children — gu ’ er , otherwise known as “ the lonely orphans. ” High ’ s book is the result of in-depth socio-legal case-based research published by the Routledge Contemporary China Series focusing on the legal grey zone of non-state orga-nized gu ’ er relief in contemporary China. It draws on a multi-year process participant observation and semi-structured interviews with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and private caregivers across rural and urban China to shed light on the ambiguous role of law in child welfare. The author ’ s nearly decade-long longitudinal ethnographic fieldwork reflects recent developments in Chinese charity law, with particular reference to the silent, and at times invisible, uphill struggle of non-governmental gu ’ er welfare providers in China.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Law and Society\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"523 - 525\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Law and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2022.14\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2022.14","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Book Discussion: Non-Governmental Orphan Relief in China: Law, Policy and Practice, by Anna High: Comments by Zheng Xu and Shahla Ali
Anna High ’ s masterful and thoughtful book, Non-Governmental Orphan Relief in China: Law, Policy and Practice , examines the interplay between non-governmental and governmental orphan relief efforts in Mainland China. Both specialist and non-specialist readers will appreciate the humanitarian value of this work, focusing as it does on issues of child rights in the context of China ’ s most disadvantaged children — gu ’ er , otherwise known as “ the lonely orphans. ” High ’ s book is the result of in-depth socio-legal case-based research published by the Routledge Contemporary China Series focusing on the legal grey zone of non-state orga-nized gu ’ er relief in contemporary China. It draws on a multi-year process participant observation and semi-structured interviews with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and private caregivers across rural and urban China to shed light on the ambiguous role of law in child welfare. The author ’ s nearly decade-long longitudinal ethnographic fieldwork reflects recent developments in Chinese charity law, with particular reference to the silent, and at times invisible, uphill struggle of non-governmental gu ’ er welfare providers in China.
期刊介绍:
The Asian Journal of Law and Society (AJLS) adds an increasingly important Asian perspective to global law and society scholarship. This independent, peer-reviewed publication encourages empirical and multi-disciplinary research and welcomes articles on law and its relationship with society in Asia, articles bringing an Asian perspective to socio-legal issues of global concern, and articles using Asia as a starting point for a comparative exploration of law and society topics. Its coverage of Asia is broad and stretches from East Asia, South Asia and South East Asia to Central Asia. A unique combination of a base in Asia and an international editorial team creates a forum for Asian and Western scholars to exchange ideas of interest to Asian scholars and professionals, those working in or on Asia, as well as all working on law and society issues globally.